IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/68743.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis & Test of Market Efficiency: A Case Study of KSE

Author

Listed:
  • Shaikh, Slam Ahmed

Abstract

This study employs more recent and comprehensive data (1997-2013) for the empirical verification of weak form efficiency in Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE). We use Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) and Philips-Perron (PP) tests to detect unit root in the daily returns series. Further, we run Random Walk Model (RWM) to detect unit root in returns series. We use Runs test to detect any possible serial correlation in residuals. Results are in support of weak form efficiency. However, the study argues that strong form efficiency does not exist in KSE. We compare equity funds returns with KSE 100 Index returns for 10 years (2003-2012) and we find that the mean returns and standard deviations are not much different. However, the correlation between the returns is found to be low which indicates that equity funds do not mimic market index and have very concentrated portfolios comprising of growth stocks. Finally, we also compare the returns and Sharpe ratio for Islamic and conventional equity mutual funds. Since Islamic funds due to investment and trading restrictions can not exactly mimic market portfolio, the return comparison could help in studying whether the contention of EMH proponents that expert investors too can do as good as earning returns on market portfolio is entirely valid or are there some qualifications and exceptions. We report evidence that challenges the EMH proposition.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaikh, Slam Ahmed, 2016. "Analysis & Test of Market Efficiency: A Case Study of KSE," MPRA Paper 68743, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:68743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/68743/1/MPRA_paper_68743.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abid Hameed & Hammad Ashraf, 2006. "Stock Market Volatility and Weak-form Efficiency: Evidence from an Emerging Market," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 45(4), pages 1029-1040.
    2. Michael C. Jensen, 1968. "The Performance Of Mutual Funds In The Period 1945–1964," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(2), pages 389-416, May.
    3. Fama, Eugene F., 1998. "Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 283-306, September.
    4. Jensen, Michael C., 1978. "Some anomalous evidence regarding market efficiency," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2-3), pages 95-101.
    5. repec:lje:journl:v:1:y:2007:i:1:p:119-140 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Khalid Mustafa & Mohammed Nishat, 2007. "Testing for Market Efficiency in Emerging Markets: A Case Study of the Karachi Stock Market," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 119-140, Jan-Jun.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meredith Beechey & David Gruen & James Vickery, 2000. "The Efficient Market Hypothesis: A Survey," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2000-01, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    2. Halari, Anwar & Tantisantiwong, Nongnuch & Power, David. M. & Helliar, Christine, 2015. "Islamic calendar anomalies: Evidence from Pakistani firm-level data," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 64-73.
    3. Christiane Goodfellow & Dirk Schiereck & Steffen Wippler, 2013. "Are behavioural finance equity funds a superior investment? A note on fund performance and market efficiency," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(2), pages 111-119, April.
    4. Thomas Delcey, 2019. "Samuelson vs Fama on the Efficient Market Hypothesis: The Point of View of Expertise [Samuelson vs Fama sur l’efficience informationnelle des marchés financiers : le point de vue de l’expertise]," Post-Print hal-01618347, HAL.
    5. Mohamed Chikhi & Anne Péguin-Feissolle & Michel Terraza, 2013. "SEMIFARMA-HYGARCH Modeling of Dow Jones Return Persistence," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 41(2), pages 249-265, February.
    6. repec:pri:cepsud:91malkiel is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Bastian Schulz, 2023. "Behavioral Finance and how its Behavioral Biases Affect German Investors," ACTA VSFS, University of Finance and Administration, vol. 17(1), pages 39-59.
    8. Dong‐Hyun Ahn & H. Henry Cao & Stéphane Chrétien, 2009. "Portfolio Performance Measurement: a No Arbitrage Bounds Approach," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 15(2), pages 298-339, March.
    9. Godfrey, Keith R.L., 2017. "Toward a model-free measure of market efficiency," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 97-112.
    10. Roland Rothenstein, 2018. "Quantification of market efficiency based on informational-entropy," Papers 1812.02371, arXiv.org.
    11. Ayub, Usman & Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali & Abbas, Qaisar, 2015. "Robust analysis for downside risk in portfolio management for a volatile stock market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 86-96.
    12. Charles, Amélie & Darné, Olivier & Fouilloux, Jessica, 2011. "Testing the martingale difference hypothesis in CO2 emission allowances," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(1-2), pages 27-35, January.
    13. Amit Goyal, 2012. "Empirical cross-sectional asset pricing: a survey," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 26(1), pages 3-38, March.
    14. Bradley Jones, 2015. "Asset Bubbles: Re-thinking Policy for the Age of Asset Management," IMF Working Papers 2015/027, International Monetary Fund.
    15. Hoechle, Daniel & Schmid, Markus & Zimmermann, Heinz, 2012. "Decomposing Performance," Working Papers on Finance 1216, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance, revised Nov 2015.
    16. O'Sullivan, Don & Hutchinson, Mark C. & O'Connell, Vincent, 2009. "Empirical evidence of the stock market's (mis)pricing of customer satisfaction," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 154-161.
    17. Armin Shmilovici & Yoav Kahiri & Irad Ben-Gal & Shmuel Hauser, 2009. "Measuring the Efficiency of the Intraday Forex Market with a Universal Data Compression Algorithm," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 33(2), pages 131-154, March.
    18. Harjoto, Maretno A. & Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Li, Qian, 2022. "A stakeholder resource-based view of corporate social irresponsibility: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 830-843.
    19. Daouda Lawa Tan Toe & Mamadou Toe & Tibi Didier Zoungrana, 2023. "Investigating the weak and semi-strong forms of Informational Efficiency on the West African Economic and Monetary Union’s Stock Exchange (BRVM) through returns predictability tests," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(9), pages 1-27, September.
    20. Hoechle, Daniel & Zimmermann, Heinz, 2007. "A Generalization of the Calendar Time Portfolio Approach and the Performance of Private Investors," Working papers 2007/14, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    21. Nelson, James M., 2006. "The "CalPERS effect" revisited again," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 187-213, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Market Efficiency; Weak Form Efficiency; Strong Form Efficiency; Capital Markets; Volatility; Asset Pricing Models; Investor Behavior; Emerging Markets;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:68743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.