IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/49294.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The reform of EU rural development policy and the challenges ahead

Author

Listed:
  • Mantino, Francesco

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to provide proposals for a reform of the future EU Rural Development policy, in the context of the 2014-2020 programming period. To this end, it is necessary to take stock of the main progress achieved by this policy over the past years. Furthermore, this paper intends to discuss the role of the main variables which can influence the future debate on the reform of RD in Europe. This paper is organised in three main sections. The first section summarises the main changes in RD since Agenda 20004 until the latest revision under the Health Check. This analysis seeks to highlight progress and weaknesses emerging from the main reviews carried out in the last decade. The second section is focused on the main variables of the policy context which might in one way or in another shape the content of RDPs after 2013,namely: the reform of the 1st pillar, the EUROPE 2020 strategy and the future of cohesion policy. These three elements are strictly interlinked with the budget reform. This section includes a final comment on the rationales for a common RD policy. The third section develops some proposals concerning the key issues for a more efficient and effective RD (new priorities,a different programming system, a delivery system more strongly based upon a territorial approach and fostering innovation).

Suggested Citation

  • Mantino, Francesco, 2010. "The reform of EU rural development policy and the challenges ahead," MPRA Paper 49294, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:49294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/49294/1/MPRA_paper_49294.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mantino, Francesco, 2009. "Typologies of governance models," Reports 157975, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Rural Development Policies.
    2. Mantino, Francesco & Bolli, Martina & Fagiani, Patrizia & Tarangioli, Serena, 2010. "Report on Policy Delivery Systems and their relations with types of governance models," MPRA Paper 49975, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberto Cagliero & Francesco Licciardo & Marzia Legnini, 2021. "The Evaluation Framework in the New CAP 2023–2027: A Reflection in the Light of Lessons Learned from Rural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Barbara Wieliczko & Agnieszka Kurdyś-Kujawska & Zbigniew Floriańczyk, 2021. "EU Rural Policy’s Capacity to Facilitate a Just Sustainability Transition of the Rural Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Rusu, Marioara, 2012. "Challenge Of Common Agricultural Policy For Rural Development In Romania," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 197-210.
    4. Bill Slee, 2024. "Collaborative Action, Policy Support and Rural Sustainability Transitions in Advanced Western Economies: The Case of Scotland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Dominika Kuberska & Mariola Grzybowska-Brzezinska & Agnieszka Brelik, 2020. "Shaping Competitiveness Through Policy: The Case of the Organic Food Market," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1334-1354.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mantino, Francesco, 2013. "Why policies fail? An institutional model explaining success and failure factors of rural development policies in Europe," MPRA Paper 50216, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mantino, Francesco, 2011. "Developing a Territorial Approach for the CAP," Working Papers 183564, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Rural Development Policies.
    3. Mantino, Francesco & Forcina, Barbara, 2011. "La governance delle politiche in aree rurali: il "nodo" delle relazioni tra politiche a livello regionale. I casi della Regione Puglia e della Regione Sardegna [The governance of rural po," MPRA Paper 50218, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Nov 2011.
    4. Birolo, Linda & Secco, Laura & Da Re, Riccardo & Cesaro, Luca, 2012. "Multi-system governance within the EU policy for rural development: a proposal for LAGs self-evaluation in the LEADER program," 126th Seminar, June 27-29, 2012, Capri, Italy 126051, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Birolo, Linda & Secco, Laura & Da Re, Riccardo & Cesaro, Luca, 2012. "Multi-system governance within the EU rural development policy: a proposal for LAGs self-evaluation in the LEADER program," Politica Agricola Internazionale - International Agricultural Policy, Edizioni L'Informatore Agrario, vol. 2012(4), pages 1-17.
    6. Pappalardo Gioacchino & Sisto Roberta & Pecorino Biagio, 2018. "Is the Partnership Governance Able to Promote Endogenous Rural Development? A Preliminary Assessment Under the Adaptive Co-Management Approach," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(4), pages 543-565, December.
    7. Csaba Ruszkai & Ilona Pajtók Tari & Csaba Patkós, 2021. "Possible Actors in Local Foodscapes? LEADER Action Groups as Short Supply Chain Agents—A European Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Rural Development; Common Agricultural Policy; Cohesion Policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:49294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.