IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/25039.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La competitividad del aguacate mexicano en el mercado estadounidense
[The competitiveness of the Mexican avocado in the American market]

Author

Listed:
  • Torres Preciado, Víctor Hugo

Abstract

Resumen El objetivo de esta investigación consiste en analizar la competitividad de las exportaciones del aguacate mexicano hacia Estados Unidos. Para tal fin, se aplica el Índice de Ventaja Relativa de Exportación (VRE) y el método de Participación Constante de Mercado (CMS). Los resultados sugieren que México es altamente competitivo en las exportaciones de aguacate y que esta tendencia parece sostenerse en los próximos años. Abstract This research aims to analyze the competitiveness of the Mexican avocado in the USA market. To this end, the Revealed Comparative Advantage Index (RCAI) and the Constant Market Share method (CMS) are applied. The results suggest that Mexico is highly competitive in the avocado exports and this trend seems to continue in the forthcoming years.

Suggested Citation

  • Torres Preciado, Víctor Hugo, 2009. "La competitividad del aguacate mexicano en el mercado estadounidense [The competitiveness of the Mexican avocado in the American market]," MPRA Paper 25039, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:25039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/25039/1/MPRA_paper_25039.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vollrath, Thomas L., 1989. "Competitiveness and Protection in World Agriculture," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309494, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z., 1995. "Wheat market shares in the presence of Japanese import quotas," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 315-323, June.
    3. Keld Laursen, 1998. "Revealed Comparative Advantage and the Alternatives as Measures of International Specialisation," DRUID Working Papers 98-30, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fertő, Imre & Hubbard, Lionel J., 2005. "Az agrárkereskedelem dinamikája - A csatlakozó országok esete [The dynamics of agri-food trade patterns - the accession countries case]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 24-38.
    2. Ferto, Imre & Hubbard, Lionel J., 2003. "The Dynamics Of Agri-Food Trade Patterns - The Hungarian Case," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25851, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Pawlak, Karolina, 2017. "Importance and Comparative Advantages of the EU and US Agri-food Sector in World Trade in 1995-2015," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 17(32, Part ), December.
    4. F. Gerard Adams & Byron Gangnes & Yochanan Shachmurove, 2006. "Why is China so Competitive? Measuring and Explaining China's Competitiveness," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 95-122, February.
    5. Dominika Choros-Mrozowska, 2020. "Changes and Comparisons in Pattern of Polish Chinese Trade within the “16+1” Format," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 327-342.
    6. Antonelli, Cristiano & Krafft, Jackie & Quatraro, Francesco, 2010. "Recombinant knowledge and growth: The case of ICTs," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 50-69, March.
    7. Bojnec, Stefan & Fertő, Imre, 2014. "Agri-food exports from European Union Member States using constant market share analysis," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 116(2), pages 1-5, August.
    8. Mariolis, Theodore & Leriou, Eirini & Soklis, George, 2019. "Dissecting the Input-Output Structure of the Greek Economy," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 72(4), pages 453-474.
    9. repec:bdi:workqs:qse_9 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Kumar, K. Nirmal Ravi, 2022. "Competitiveness of Indian Agricultural Exports: A Constant Market Share Analysis," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 3(2), May.
    11. Aleksandra Parteka, 2010. "Employment and export specialisation along the development path: some robust evidence," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 145(4), pages 615-640, January.
    12. Tri WIDODO, 2009. "Comparative Advantage: Theory, Empirical Measures And Case Studies," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 4, pages 57-82, November.
    13. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6m5kss847r91no96hiublu6anu is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Ishchukova, N. & Smutka, L., 2013. "Comparative Advantage: Products Mapping of the Russian Agricultural Exports," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 5(3), pages 1-12, September.
    15. Lee, Jim, 2011. "Export specialization and economic growth around the world," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 45-63, March.
    16. Depetris Guiguet, Edith & García Arancibia, Rodrigo & Rossini, Gustavo, 2010. "Consistencia de indicadores de especialización en el comercio internacional. Aplicación al caso de la mantequilla en Argentina y Uruguay = Consistency of Specialization Indicators. An Application to A," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 9(1), pages 85-105, June.
    17. Miriam Katunze & Annette Kuteesa, 2016. "Uganda’s Revealed Comparative Advantage in COMESA," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 192-192, April.
    18. Orszaghova, Lucia & Savelin, Li & Schudel, Willem, 2013. "External competitiveness of EU candidate countries," Occasional Paper Series 141, European Central Bank.
    19. Chen, Kevin Z. & Duan, Yufeng, 2001. "Competitiveness Of Canadian Agri-Food Exports Against Competitors In Asia: 1980-97," Project Report Series 24042, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    20. Semih Akçomak & Erdal Akdeve & Derya Findik, 2013. "How do ICT firms in Turkey manage innovation? Diversity in expertise versus diversity in markets," STPS Working Papers 1301, STPS - Science and Technology Policy Studies Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Apr 2013.
    21. Junshi Li & Yao Pan, 2023. "EU and China’s comparative advantage, trade complementarity and trade specialization dynamics in agricultural products," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 351-379, September.
    22. Waqar Akhtar & M. Sharif & Hassnain Shah, 2009. "Competitiveness of Pakistani Fruits in the World Market," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 125-133, Jul-Dec.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Palabras clave: Aguacate; Exportaciones; Competitividad; Participación Constante de Mercado; Ventaja Comparativa Revelada; México.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade
    • Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:25039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.