IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/24872.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The choice between bus and light rail transit: a stylised cost-benefit analysis model

Author

Listed:
  • Grimaldi, Raffaele
  • Laurino, Antonio
  • Beria, Paolo

Abstract

In the last 20 years light rail and tramway schemes have been introduced in many European cities. The effects of these schemes over public transport patronage, and the benefits they have generated, seem to have sometimes been overestimated. The availability of some experiences helps in deriving some reflections about the circumstances in which light rail schemes can be truly convenient compared to bus systems. This paper tries to give a contribution by developing a simplified model to support the choice between keeping a bus corridor or upgrading towards a light rail system. The choice is analysed on the basis of a parametrical socio-economic cost-benefit analysis. All the parameters introduced and used for a numerical simulation are discussed and some typical values from the literature are given. On the basis of these values, some feasibility abaci are drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • Grimaldi, Raffaele & Laurino, Antonio & Beria, Paolo, 2010. "The choice between bus and light rail transit: a stylised cost-benefit analysis model," MPRA Paper 24872, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:24872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/24872/1/MPRA_paper_24872.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Short, Jack & Kopp, Andreas, 2005. "Transport infrastructure: Investment and planning. Policy and research aspects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 360-367, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kuci ALUSH & Vladimir MUKA, 2017. "Aspects Regarding the Efficiency of the Tertiary Education in Integrated Transport, Sustainable Way to Develop the Public Policy," North Economic Review, Technical University of Cluj Napoca, Department of Economics and Physics, vol. 1(1), pages 75-82, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. BADALYAN, Gohar & HERZFELD, Thomas & RAJCANIOVA, Miroslava, 2014. "Transport Infrastructure And Economic Growth: Panel Data Approach For Armenia, Georgia And Turkey," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Ricardo S. Martins & Mauro Borges Lemos, 2006. "Corredor Centro-Leste: Sistemas De Transporte De Minas Gerais Na Perspectivas Dos Eixos De Desenvolvimento E Integração," Anais do XII Semin·rio sobre a Economia Mineira [Proceedings of the 12th Seminar on the Economy of Minas Gerais], in: João Antonio de Paula & et alli (ed.),Anais do XII Seminário sobre a Economia Mineira [Proceedings of the 12th Seminar on the Economy of Minas Gerais], Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    3. Rogier Pennings & Bart Wiegmans & Tejo Spit, 2020. "Can We Have Our Cake and Still Eat It? A Review of Flexibility in the Structural Spatial Development and Passenger Transport Relation in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-25, July.
    4. Riccardo Crescenzi & Marco Di Cataldo & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2016. "Government Quality And The Economic Returns Of Transport Infrastructure Investment In European Regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 555-582, September.
    5. Polydoropoulou, Amalia & Roumboutsos, Athena, 2009. "Evaluating the impact of decision making during construction on transport project outcome," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 369-380, November.
    6. Kim, Hyungtai & Ahn, Sanghoon & Ulfarsson, Gudmundur F., 2018. "Transportation infrastructure investment and the location of new manufacturing around South Korea's West Coast Expressway," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 146-154.
    7. Khraibani, R. & de Palma, A. & Picard, N. & Kaysi, I., 2016. "A new evaluation and decision making framework investigating the elimination-by-aspects model in the context of transportation projects' investment choices," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 67-81.
    8. Tei, Alessio & Ferrari, Claudio, 2018. "PPIs and transport infrastructure: Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 204-212.
    9. Chen, Fanglin & Hao, Xinyue & Chen, Zhongfei, 2021. "Can high-speed rail improve health and alleviate health inequality? Evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 266-279.
    10. Bohne Albrecht & Heinemann Friedrich & Niebel Thomas & Thöne Michael, 2024. "Die Zukunftsquote: ein neuer Kompass für den Bundeshaushalt," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 25(2), pages 113-129.
    11. Mauro Pisu & Henrik Braconier, 2013. "Road Connectivity and the Border Effect: Evidence from Europe," Discussion Papers 2013-06, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    12. Donnet, Timothy & Ryley, Tim & Lohmann, Gui & Spasojevic, Bojana, 2018. "Developing a Queensland (Australia) aviation network strategy: Lessons from three international contexts," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1-14.
    13. Wang, Ling & Wang, Ke & Zhang, Jianjun & Zhang, Di & Wu, Xia & Zhang, Lijun, 2020. "Multiple objective-oriented land supply for sustainable transportation: A perspective from industrial dependence, dominance and restrictions of 127 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Ghosh, Prabir Kumar & Dinda, Soumyananda, 2019. "Revisited the Relationship Between Economic Growth and Transport Infrastructure in India: An Empirical Study," MPRA Paper 116876, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Feb 2021.
    15. Auvinen, Heidi & Ruutu, Sampsa & Tuominen, Anu & Ahlqvist, Toni & Oksanen, Juha, 2015. "Process supporting strategic decision-making in systemic transitions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 97-114.
    16. Cárcamo-Díaz, Rodrigo, 2007. "Coordination of public expenditure in transport infrastructure: analysis and policy perspectives for Latin America," Macroeconomía del Desarrollo 5423, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    17. Caroline A. Rodenburg & Peter Nijkamp & Henri L.F. De Groot & Erik T. Verhoef, 2008. "Valuation Of Multi‐Functional Land Use By Commercial Investors: A Case Study On The Amsterdam Zuidas Mega‐Project," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 99(4), pages 454-469, September.
    18. Junseo Bae & Sang-Guk Yum & Ji-Myong Kim, 2021. "Harnessing Machine Learning for Classifying Economic Damage Trends in Transportation Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, June.
    19. Deng, Ping & Lu, Shiqing & Xiao, Hanbin, 2013. "Evaluation of the relevance measure between ports and regional economy using structural equation modeling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 123-133.
    20. Imran Yusoff & Boon-Kwee Ng & Suzana Ariff Azizan, 2021. "Towards sustainable transport policy framework: A rail-based transit system in Klang Valley, Malaysia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-30, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cost-benefit analysis; bus; tram; light rail; transit; public transport;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H54 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Infrastructures
    • L92 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation
    • R42 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government and Private Investment Analysis; Road Maintenance; Transportation Planning
    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:24872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.