IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/21263.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Temporal changes in the parameters of statistical distribution of journal impact factor

Author

Abstract

Statistical distribution of Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is characteristically asymmetric and non-mesokurtic. Even the distribution of log10(JIF) exhibits conspicuous skewness and non-mesokurticity. In this paper we estimate the parameters of Johnson SU distribution fitting to the log10(JIF) data for 8 years, 2001 through 2008, and study the temporal variations in those estimated parameters. We also study ‘over-the-samples stability’ in the estimated parameters for each year by the method of re-sampling close to bootstrapping. It has been found that log10(JIF) is Pearson-IV distributed. Johnson SU distribution fits very well to the data and yields parameters stable over the samples. We conclude that Johnson SU distribution is the best choice to fit to the log10(JIF) data. We have also found that over the years the log10(JIF) distribution is becoming more skewed and leptokurtic, possibly suggesting the Mathew effect in operation, which means that more cited journals are cited ever more over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Mishra, SK, 2010. "Temporal changes in the parameters of statistical distribution of journal impact factor," MPRA Paper 21263, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:21263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21263/1/MPRA_paper_21263.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mishra, SK, 2009. "Does the Journal Impact Factor help make a Good Indicator of Academic Performance?," MPRA Paper 17712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mishra, SK, 2010. "A note on empirical sample distribution of journal impact factors in major discipline groups," MPRA Paper 20747, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Pandu Tadikamalla, 1980. "On simulating non-normal distributions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(2), pages 273-279, June.
    4. Mishra, SK, 2010. "Empirical probability distribution of journal impact factor and over-the-samples stability in its estimated parameters," MPRA Paper 20919, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias R. Fengler & Helmut Herwartz & Christian Werner, 2012. "A Dynamic Copula Approach to Recovering the Index Implied Volatility Skew," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 457-493, June.
    2. Max Auerswald & Morten Moshagen, 2015. "Generating Correlated, Non-normally Distributed Data Using a Non-linear Structural Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 920-937, December.
    3. Al-Subaihi, Ali A., 2004. "Simulating Correlated Multivariate Pseudorandom Numbers," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 9(i04).
    4. Leah M. Feuerstahler, 2019. "Metric Transformations and the Filtered Monotonic Polynomial Item Response Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(1), pages 105-123, March.
    5. Brzezinski, Michal, 2014. "Empirical modeling of the impact factor distribution," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 362-368.
    6. Dhillon, Sharanjit Kaur & Ibrahim, Roliana & Selamat, Ali, 2015. "Factors associated with scholarly publication productivity among academic staff: Case of a Malaysian public university," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 160-166.
    7. Gary van Vuuren & Riaan de Jongh, 2017. "A comparison of risk aggregation estimates using copulas and Fleishman distributions," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(17), pages 1715-1731, April.
    8. Nagahara, Yuichi, 2004. "A method of simulating multivariate nonnormal distributions by the Pearson distribution system and estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 1-29, August.
    9. Ke-Hai Yuan & Peter Bentler, 2002. "On robusiness of the normal-theory based asymptotic distributions of three reliability coefficient estimates," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 251-259, June.
    10. repec:jss:jstsof:09:i04 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Njål Foldnes & Steffen Grønneberg, 2015. "How General is the Vale–Maurelli Simulation Approach?," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 1066-1083, December.
    12. Ken Stange & Robert Saltstone, 1992. "A computer program to construct distributions with specific degrees of skew and kurtosis," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 9(1), pages 141-142, January.
    13. Mishra, SK, 2004. "On generating correlated random variables with a given valid or invalid Correlation matrix," MPRA Paper 1782, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Sarabia, José María & Prieto, Faustino & Trueba, Carmen, 2012. "Modeling the probabilistic distribution of the impact factor," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 66-79.
    15. Jiann-wien Hsu & Ding-wei Huang, 2016. "Impact factor distribution revisited with graphical representation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(3), pages 1321-1329, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Journal Impact Factor; Johnson SU Distribution; Mathew effect; over-the-samples stability; bootstrapping; Pearson distribution type IV; re-sampling; skewness; kurtosis; temporal variations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C16 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Econometric and Statistical Methods; Specific Distributions
    • C46 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Specific Distributions
    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:21263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.