IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v42y2015icp160-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with scholarly publication productivity among academic staff: Case of a Malaysian public university

Author

Listed:
  • Dhillon, Sharanjit Kaur
  • Ibrahim, Roliana
  • Selamat, Ali

Abstract

The importance of scholarly publications to an institute of higher learning cannot be exaggerated. Publication leads to the creation of new knowledge, increases an institution's reputation, stimulates modernization and innovation, enhance the quality of academic staff and improves the economic status of the institution. Although there has been a satisfactory level of scholarly publication production among the academic staff of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), the targets for the key performance indicators have not been achieved as desired by the institution. It is therefore significant to thoroughly understand the influencing factors for research productivity among the university staffs. The aim of this study is to investigate the factors associated with scholarly publication productivity at UTM by determining the influence of three factors, namely personal, environmental and behavioral is associated with scholarly publication productivity among academic staff. The study uses a descriptive survey to collect all relevant data. The target population consists of academic staff of UTM and particularly those from the middle management level. The results show that all three factors had a positive influence on the scholarly publication productivity among the targeted population.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhillon, Sharanjit Kaur & Ibrahim, Roliana & Selamat, Ali, 2015. "Factors associated with scholarly publication productivity among academic staff: Case of a Malaysian public university," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 160-166.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:42:y:2015:i:c:p:160-166
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.04.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X15000391
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.04.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sulin Ba & Jan Stallaert & Andrew B. Whinston, 2001. "Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design—The Case for Incentive Alignment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 225-239, September.
    2. Mishra, SK, 2009. "Does the Journal Impact Factor help make a Good Indicator of Academic Performance?," MPRA Paper 17712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Jiang & Ou, Guiyan & Liu, Xiaohui & Dong, Ke, 2022. "How does academic education background affect top researchers’ performance? Evidence from the field of artificial intelligence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    2. Yu-Wei Chang, 2021. "Characteristics of high research performance authors in the field of library and information science and those of their articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3373-3391, April.
    3. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela & Musioł-Urbańczyk, Anna & Podgórska, Marzena & Wolny, Maciej, 2021. "Does motivation matter in evaluation of research institutions? Evidence from Polish public universities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Fahad Ghabban & Ali Selamat & Roliana Ibrahim & Ondrej Krejcar & Petra Maresova & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2019. "The Influence of Personal and Organizational Factors on Researchers’ Attitudes towards Sustainable Research Productivity in Saudi Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-28, September.
    5. Ghabban, Fahad & Selamat, Ali & Ibrahim, Roliana, 2018. "New model for encouraging academic staff in Saudi universities to use IT for knowledge sharing to improve scholarly publication performance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 92-99.
    6. Norliyana Kamarudin & Bany-Ariffin, A. N & Hussin Yusof & Yusnita Tugiran & Asrizam Esam & Yushaida Yusof, 2018. "Analysing the Importance of Demographic Factor as Determinant ofResearch Efficiency through Data Envelopment Analysis," International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs (IJBEA), Sana N. Maswadeh, vol. 3(3), pages 114-129.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mishra, SK, 2010. "Temporal changes in the parameters of statistical distribution of journal impact factor," MPRA Paper 21263, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Sanghyun Kim & Bora Kim & Minsoo Seo, 2020. "Impacts of Sustainable Information Technology Capabilities on Information Security Assimilation: The Moderating Effects of Policy—Technology Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Zhiling Guo & Gary J. Koehler & Andrew B. Whinston, 2012. "A Computational Analysis of Bundle Trading Markets Design for Distributed Resource Allocation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-1), pages 823-843, September.
    4. Carol Hsu & Jae-Nam Lee & Detmar W. Straub, 2012. "Institutional Influences on Information Systems Security Innovations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(3-part-2), pages 918-939, September.
    5. Bahlmann, Jan & Spiller, Achim, 2008. "The Relationship between Supply Chain Coordination and Quality Assurance Systems: A Case Study Approach on the German Meat Sector," 110th Seminar, February 18-22, 2008, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 49768, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Tobias Widmer & Paul Karaenke & Vijayan Sugumaran, 2021. "Two‐sided service markets: Effects of quality differentiation on market efficiency," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(3), pages 588-604, April.
    7. Kazem Haki & Michael Blaschke & Stephan Aier & Robert Winter, 2019. "A Value Co-creation Perspective on Information Systems Analysis and Design," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 487-502, August.
    8. Wil M. P. Aalst & Jörg Becker & Martin Bichler & Hans Ulrich Buhl & Jens Dibbern & Ulrich Frank & Ulrich Hasenkamp & Armin Heinzl & Oliver Hinz & Kai-Lung Hui & Matthias Jarke & Dimitris Karagiannis &, 2018. "Views on the Past, Present, and Future of Business and Information Systems Engineering," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(6), pages 443-477, December.
    9. Cordella, Antonio & Cordella, Tito, 2017. "Motivations, monitoring technologies, and pay for performance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 236-255.
    10. Venkatesh, Viswanath & Davis, Fred D. & Zhu, Yaping, 2022. "A cultural contingency model of knowledge sharing and job performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 202-219.
    11. Nelson Granados & Alok Gupta & Robert J. Kauffman, 2010. "Research Commentary---Information Transparency in Business-to-Consumer Markets: Concepts, Framework, and Research Agenda," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 207-226, June.
    12. Jie Lou & Yulin Fang & Kai H. Lim & Jerry Zeyu Peng, 2013. "Contributing high quantity and quality knowledge to online Q&A communities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(2), pages 356-371, February.
    13. Wen-Bao Lin, 2013. "Research on knowledge sharing and interpersonal relationships: empirical study of family firms and non-family firms," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 151-166, January.
    14. N. Baptista & José Carlos Pinho & Helena Alves, 2021. "Examining social capital and online social support links: a study in online health communities facing treatment uncertainty," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(1), pages 57-94, March.
    15. T. S. Raghu & B. Jayaraman & H. R. Rao, 2004. "Toward an Integration of Agent- and Activity-Centric Approaches in Organizational Process Modeling: Incorporating Incentive Mechanisms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 316-335, December.
    16. Ostheimer, Julia & Chowdhury, Soumitra & Iqbal, Sarfraz, 2021. "An alliance of humans and machines for machine learning: Hybrid intelligent systems and their design principles," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    17. Lin, Hui & Hwang, Yujong, 2021. "The effects of personal information management capabilities and social-psychological factors on accounting professionals’ knowledge-sharing intentions: Pre and post COVID-19," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    18. Mitra, Amit & O'Regan, Nicholas & Sarpong, David, 2018. "Cloud resource adaptation: A resource based perspective on value creation for corporate growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 28-38.
    19. Sangmi Chai & Bomi Choi & Minkyun Kim & T. C. E. Cheng, 2023. "Why do people speak about products online? The role of opinion leadership," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Johnson, Devon S., 2008. "Beyond trial: Consumer assimilation of electronic channels," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 28-44.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:42:y:2015:i:c:p:160-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.