IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/122941.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Approaches to risk analysis in the financial sector based on machine learning and artificial intelligence methods

Author

Listed:
  • Dyakonova, Ludmila
  • Konstantinov, Alexey

Abstract

The article studies approaches to improving the forecasting quality of machine learning models in finance. An overview of studies devoted to the application of machine learning models and artificial intelligence in the banking sector is given, both from the point of view of risk management and considering in more detail the applied methods of credit scoring and fraud detection. Aspects of applying explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods in financial organizations are considered. To identify the most effective machine learning models, the authors conducted experiments to compare 8 classification models used in the financial sector. The gradient boosting model CatboostClassifier was chosen as the base model. A comparison was carried out for the results obtained on the CatboostClassifier model with the characteristics of the other models: IsolationForest, feature ranking model using Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), XAI Shapley values method, positive class weight increase models wrapper model. All models were applied to 5 open financial data sets. 1 dataset contains transaction data of credit card transactions, 3 datasets contain data on retail lending, and 1 dataset contains data on consumer lending. Our calculations revealed slight improvement for the models IsolationForest and wrapper model in comparison with the base CatboostClassifier model in terms of ROC_AUC for loan defaults data.

Suggested Citation

  • Dyakonova, Ludmila & Konstantinov, Alexey, 2024. "Approaches to risk analysis in the financial sector based on machine learning and artificial intelligence methods," MPRA Paper 122941, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:122941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/122941/1/MPRA_paper_122941.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    financial risks; credit scoring; fraud detection; machine learning; explainable artificial intelligence methods; Catboost; SHAP;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:122941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.