IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/121484.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The CORSIA climate agreement on international air transport as a game

Author

Listed:
  • Proost, Stef
  • Vander Loo, Saskia

Abstract

The CORSIA climate agreement requires the signatories to cap their bilateral international aviation carbon emissions to 85% of the level of 2019. Signatories can satisfy the cap by using offsets and sustainable aviation (SAF) fuels.This international agreement faces three handicaps: the agreement must be self-enforcing, very cheap offsets and SAF’s with a high indirect emission are not credible and offsets and SAF’s do not guarantee climate neutrality. We study the participation decision of a country to join or not CORSIA in a Nash context. It is shown that there are pairs of countries for whom it is beneficial to join CORSIA if their climate benefit is higher than half the cost of offsets or SAF fuels. The numerical model illustration for the 10 most important countries shows that only a few countries are likely to effectively participate and will do this via offsets rather than via SAF blends.

Suggested Citation

  • Proost, Stef & Vander Loo, Saskia, 2024. "The CORSIA climate agreement on international air transport as a game," MPRA Paper 121484, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:121484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/121484/1/MPRA_paper_121484.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Aviation; climate; international climate agreement; fuel efficiency aviation; offsets; biofuels;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • R48 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government Pricing and Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:121484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.