IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/120976.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Предмет И Методы Экономических Наук
[Scope and Method of the Economic Sciences]

Author

Listed:
  • Bukvić, Rajko

Abstract

Russian. В пособии рассматриваются основные теоретические и методологические понятия современной экономической науки. В четырёх частях последовательно расстолковываются материалы вводного уровня по проблемам понятийного и категориального охвата экономических наук. В первой части освещается понятие науки и общей экономической науки, начиная с фактов, гипотез, теорий и науки, и заканчивая с предметом политической экономии. Вторая часть пособия посвящена научному методу, особенно специфическим характеристикам метода в экономических науках и средствам экономических исследований. В третьей части рассматриваются научные законы вообще и особенно экономические законы и их характеристики. Наконец, последняя часть пособия посвщена системе экономических наук, охватывающей кроме общей ещё и конкретные, отдельные, исторические и информационно-аналитические экономические науки. English. The manual examines the basic theoretical and methodological concepts of modern economic science. In four parts, introductory-level materials on the problems of conceptual and categorical coverage of economic sciences are sequentially explained. The first part covers the concept of science and general economics, starting with facts, hypotheses, theories and science, and ending with the subject of political economy. The second part of the manual is devoted to the scientific method, especially the specific characteristics of the method in economic sciences and the means of economic research. The third part examines scientific laws in general and especially economic laws and their characteristics. Finally, the last part of the manual is devoted to the system of economic sciences, which, in addition to the general one, also covers specific, individual, historical and information-analytical economic sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Bukvić, Rajko, 2024. "Предмет И Методы Экономических Наук [Scope and Method of the Economic Sciences]," MPRA Paper 120976, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2024.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:120976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/120976/1/MPRA_paper_120976.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hausman, Daniel M, 1989. "Economic Methodology in a Nutshell," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 3(2), pages 115-127, Spring.
    2. Walter A. Weisskopf, 1979. "The Method Is the Ideology: From a Newtonian to a Heisenbergian Paradigm in Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 869-884, December.
    3. Boland, Lawrence A, 1979. "A Critique of Friedman's Critics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 503-522, June.
    4. William M. Dugger, 1979. "Methodological Differences between Institutional and Neoclassical Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 899-909, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brahmachari, Deborshi, 2016. "Neoclassical Economics as a Method of Scientific Research Program : A review of existing literature," MPRA Paper 75341, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Paul Pfleiderer, 2014. "Camaleones: el mal uso de modelos teóricos en finanzas y economía," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 16(31), pages 23-30, July-Dece.
    3. Yalcintas, Altug, 2013. "The Oomph in economic philosophy: a bibliometric analysis of the main trends, from the 1960s to the present," MPRA Paper 44191, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Wilfred Dolfsma, 2001. "Economists as subjects: Toward a psychology of economists," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 77-88, March.
    5. Ole Røgeberg & Morten Nordberg, 2005. "A defence of absurd theories in economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 543-562.
    6. Sidney G. Winter, 2017. "Pursuing the evolutionary agenda in economics and management research," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 41(3), pages 721-747.
    7. McDonald, John, 2009. "Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 792-798, September.
    8. Escañuela Romana, Ignacio, 2016. "Azar, Determinismo e Indecidibilidad en la Teoría del Ciclo Económico [Randomness, Determinism and Undecidability in the Business Cycle Theory]," MPRA Paper 72978, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Uskali Mäki, 2004. "Realism and the Nature of Theory: A Lesson from J H von Thünen for Economists and Geographers," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(10), pages 1719-1736, October.
    10. Ashok Chakravarti, 2012. "Institutions, Economic Performance and the Visible Hand," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14751.
    11. Hendrik P. van Dalen, 2019. "Values of Economists Matter in the Art and Science of Economics," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 472-499, August.
    12. Galbács Peter, 2021. "What did it take for Lucas to set up ‘useful’ analogue systems in monetary business cycle theory?," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 7(3), pages 61-82, September.
    13. Gebhard Kirchgässner, 2015. "Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften: Einige Bemerkungen," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 135(2), pages 209-248.
    14. Zanotti, Gabriel J. & Cachanosky, Nicolás, 2015. "Implications Of Machlup’S Interpretation Of Mises’S Epistemology," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 111-138, March.
    15. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2010. "Axiomatic Basics of e-Economics," MPRA Paper 24331, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Brendan Markey-Towler & John Foster, 2013. "Understanding the causes of income inequality in complex economic systems," Discussion Papers Series 478, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    17. Lawrence A. Boland & Irene M. Gordon, 1992. "Criticizing positive accounting theory," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 142-170, September.
    18. D Wade Hands, 2013. "GP08 is the New F53: Gul and Pesendorfer’s Methodological Essay from the Viewpoint of Blaug’s Popperian Methodology," Chapters, in: Marcel Boumans & Matthias Klaes (ed.), Mark Blaug: Rebel with Many Causes, chapter 17, pages 245-266, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. GC Harcourt, 2016. "Stanley Wong (23 July 1947–30 April 2016): A tribute," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 27(4), pages 559-561, December.
    20. Stanley C. W. Salvary, 2004. "Society, Science, And Economics: The Delicate Balance Between Ideology And Epistemology And The Concept Of Fairness," Method and Hist of Econ Thought 0412002, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    экономика; наука; предмет; методы; economics; science; scope; methods;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General
    • B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:120976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.