IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/119741.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

SMIBe – Konzept eines softwarebasiertes Mehrebenen-Informationssystem für Behörden zur digitalen Erfassung und Evaluierung von beweidungsbezogenen AUKM
["SMIBe – Concept of a software-based multilevel information system for authorities to support digitalization and evaluation of grazing-related AES]

Author

Listed:
  • Sturm, Astrid
  • Schöttker, Oliver
  • Kadir, Karmand
  • Wätzold, Frank

Abstract

We present the concept of a software-based multi-level information system for authorities (SMIBe) designed to digital evaluate agri-environmental and climate measures (AES) for grazing. SMIBe enables authorities to summarize key parameters of grazing AES and record them in SMIBe for further digital processing as well as export and share them with farmers. Farmers can submit their digital documentation to the authority after completing an AES measure, and thus feed the evidence into SMIBe in form of relevant documents and data individually authorized by the farmers (e.g. photos, satellite or drone data, sensor data from animal collars documenting compliance with AES specifications). SMIBe is an important interface for the processing and interpretation of animal movement data collected by new sensor technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Sturm, Astrid & Schöttker, Oliver & Kadir, Karmand & Wätzold, Frank, 2024. "SMIBe – Konzept eines softwarebasiertes Mehrebenen-Informationssystem für Behörden zur digitalen Erfassung und Evaluierung von beweidungsbezogenen AUKM ["SMIBe – Concept of a software-based mu," MPRA Paper 119741, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:119741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/119741/1/MPRA_paper_119741.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriele Mack & Andreas Kohler & Katja Heitkämper & Nadja El-Benni, 2019. "Determinants of the perceived administrative transaction costs caused by the uptake of an agri-environmental program," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(10), pages 1802-1819, August.
    2. Sturm, Astrid & Drechsler, Martin & Johst, Karin & Mewes, Melanie & Wätzold, Frank, 2018. "DSS-Ecopay – A decision support software for designing ecologically effective and cost-effective agri-environment schemes to conserve endangered grassland biodiversity," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 113-116.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong Leng & Bingbing Han, 2022. "Effect of Environmental Planning on Elderly Individual Quality of Life in Severe Cold Regions: A Case Study in Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2022. "Как Да Оценим Управленческата Ефективност На Българските Земеделски Стопанства [How to assess the governance efficiency of Bulgarian agricultural farms]," MPRA Paper 113590, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Gerling, Charlotte & Drechsler, Martin & Keuler, Klaus & Sturm, Astrid & Wätzold, Frank, 2022. "Time to consider the timing of conservation measures: designing cost-effective agri-environment schemes under climate change," MPRA Paper 113877, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Langhammer, Maria & Thober, Jule & Lange, Martin & Frank, Karin & Grimm, Volker, 2019. "Agricultural landscape generators for simulation models: A review of existing solutions and an outline of future directions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 135-151.
    5. Topping, Christopher J. & Dalby, Lars & Valdez, Jose W., 2019. "Landscape-scale simulations as a tool in multi-criteria decision making to support agri-environment schemes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Sina Shahab & Leonhard K. Lades, 2020. "Sludge and Transaction Costs," Working Papers 202007, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    7. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2022. "A framework for assessing the governance efficiency of agricultural farms," MPRA Paper 113696, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Luigi Biagini & Simone Severini, 2021. "The role of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in enhancing and stabilising farm income: an analysis of income transfer efficiency and the Income Stabilisation Tool," Papers 2104.14188, arXiv.org.
    9. Gerling, Charlotte & Sturm, Astrid & Wätzold, Frank, 2019. "Ecological-economic modelling to compare the impact of organic and conventional farming on endangered grassland bird and butterfly species," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 424-434.
    10. Colombo, Sergio & Castro-Rodríguez, Juan & Peréz-Pérez, Daniel & Almagro, María, 2024. "Analysis of the environmental and economic performance of common agricultural policy eco-schemes in soil organic carbon sequestration," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    11. Luigi Biagini & Federico Antonioli & Simone Severini, 2020. "The Role of the Common Agricultural Policy in Enhancing Farm Income: A Dynamic Panel Analysis Accounting for Farm Size in Italy," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 652-675, September.
    12. Markova-Nenova, Nonka & Wätzold, Frank & Sturm, Astrid, 2020. "Distributional Impacts of Cost-effective Spatially Homogeneous and Regionalized Agri-Environment Payments. A case study of a Grassland Scheme in Saxony, Germany," MPRA Paper 104759, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Bartkowski, Bartosz & Droste, Nils & Ließ, Mareike & Sidemo-Holm, William & Weller, Ulrich & Brady, Mark V., 2021. "Payments by modelled results: A novel design for agri-environmental schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    14. Schöttker, Oliver & Hütt, Christoph & Jauker, Frank & Witt, Johanna & Bareth, Georg & Wätzold, Frank, 2022. "Monitoring costs of result-based payments for biodiversity conservation: Will UAV-based remote sensing be the game-changer?," MPRA Paper 112942, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Hao, Zhengzheng & Sturm, Astrid & Wätzold, Frank, 2020. "A novel spatially explicit hydro-economic modelling procedure to design cost-effective agri-environment schemes for mitigating nitrogen and phosphorus from agricultural land," MPRA Paper 102860, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Moxey, Andrew & Smyth, Mary-Ann & Taylor, Emily & Williams, A. Prysor, 2021. "Barriers and opportunities facing the UK Peatland Code: A case-study of blended green finance," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    17. Lundmark, Robert, 2022. "Time-adjusted transaction costs for energy renovations for single-family house-owners," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    18. Robert J. Johnston & Tom Ndebele & David A. Newburn, 2023. "Modeling transaction costs in household adoption of landscape conservation practices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(1), pages 341-367, January.
    19. Hrabrin BACHEV, 2022. "An Approach To Understanding And Assessing The Governance Efficiency Of Agricultural Enterprises," Economic Archive, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 2 Year 20, pages 21-38.
    20. Salomon Espinosa Diaz & Francesco Riccioli & Francesco Di Iacovo & Roberta Moruzzo, 2023. "Transaction Costs in Agri-Environment-Climate Measures: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Beweidung; Grünland; Weideproduktionssystem;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:119741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.