IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/118621.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Red Sea Ecotourism: A Case Study on Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Selim, Tarek

Abstract

Ecological tourism is one of the major expanding types of tourism worldwide. An ecotourist is a traveler interested in nature’s beauty and life diversity while guaranteeing minimal impact on natural and cultural endowments and is willing to pay an economic value to satisfy those needs. Hence, ecotourism generates value added economic benefits to society while at the same time guarantees the sustainability of environmental resources for future tourism receipts. The Egyptian ecotourism industry constitutes a critical element of the country’s path to sustainable development. The element of sustainability as a cornerstone of ecotourism is essentially important for the survival and well-being of environmental resources in Egyptian ecological resorts. To incorporate the notion of sustainability, this paper primarily conducts an environmental industry analysis on Egypt’s ecological tourism as a case study to the implementation of clean environmental elements coupled with strong economic competitiveness. The approach undertaken supports the formulation of strategies to maximize economic returns, capture environmental market opportunities, and reduce negative environmental impacts especially on Egyptian coastal zones. Important elements for the enhancement of the Egyptian ecotourism industry are reached in terms of industry competitiveness and environmental conservation. Such elements are necessary towards the target of sustainable tourism development in Egypt.

Suggested Citation

  • Selim, Tarek, 2009. "Red Sea Ecotourism: A Case Study on Sustainable Development," MPRA Paper 118621, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:118621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/118621/1/MPRA_paper_118621.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gjalt Huppes & Masanobu Ishikawa, 2005. "A Framework for Quantified Eco‐efficiency Analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 9(4), pages 25-41, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nine Klaassen & Arno Scheepens & Bas Flipsen & Joost Vogtlander, 2020. "Eco-Efficient Value Creation of Residential Street Lighting Systems by Simultaneously Analysing the Value, the Costs and the Eco-Costs during the Design and Engineering Phase," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Meike Weltin & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Sustainable Intensification Farming as an Enabler for Farm Eco-Efficiency?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 315-342, January.
    3. Gong, Xiaoxing & Wu, Xiaofan & Luo, Meifeng, 2019. "Company performance and environmental efficiency: A case study for shipping enterprises," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 96-106.
    4. Eva Richterová & Martin Richter & Zlata Sojková, 2021. "Regional eco-efficiency of the agricultural sector in V4 regions, its dynamics in time and decomposition on the technological and pure technical eco-efficiency change," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 16(3), pages 553-576, September.
    5. Fan, Jiongming & Hu, Shanying & Chen, Dingjiang & Zhou, Yucheng, 2017. "Study on the construction and optimization of a resource-based industrial ecosystem," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 97-108.
    6. Marlena Gołaś & Piotr Sulewski & Adam Wąs & Anna Kłoczko-Gajewska & Kinga Pogodzińska, 2020. "On the Way to Sustainable Agriculture—Eco-Efficiency of Polish Commercial Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Jiliang Zheng & Xiaoting Peng, 2019. "Does an Ecological Industry Chain Improve the Eco-Efficiency of an Industrial Cluster? Based on Empirical Study of an Energy-Intensive Industrial Cluster in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Yufeng Cheng & Kai Zhu & Quan Zhou & Youssef El Archi & Moaaz Kabil & Bulcsú Remenyik & Lóránt Dénes Dávid, 2023. "Tourism Ecological Efficiency and Sustainable Development in the Hanjiang River Basin: A Super-Efficiency Slacks-Based Measure Model Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Edward Majewski & Anna Komerska & Jerzy Kwiatkowski & Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Adam Wąs & Piotr Sulewski & Marlena Gołaś & Kinga Pogodzińska & Jean-Loup Lecoeur & Barbara Tocco & Áron Török & Michele, 2020. "Are Short Food Supply Chains More Environmentally Sustainable than Long Chains? A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the Eco-Efficiency of Food Chains in Selected EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-26, September.
    10. Shao, Shuai & Tan, Zhijia & Wang, Tingsong & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2023. "Configuration design of the emission control areas for coastal ships: A Stackelberg game model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    11. Soyemi Kenny Adedapo & Okewale Joel Adeniyi & Olaniyan Joshua Damilare, 2021. "Environmental Responsiveness and Firm Value: Evidence from Nigeria," Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 133-155, September.
    12. Martinsson, Elin & Storm, Hugo, 2022. "Evaluating environmental effects of the adoption of automatic milking systems in Norway," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321199, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    13. Lilly Meynerts & Uwe Götze & Sören Claus, 2016. "Integrative Bewertung der lebenszyklusbezogenen ökonomischen und ökologischen Vorteilhaftigkeit von Hybridschienenfahrzeugen," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 75-81, June.
    14. Wenqiang Jiang & Baocai Su & Shuisheng Fan, 2023. "Spatial Disequilibrium and Dynamic Evolution of Eco-Efficiency in China’s Tea Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    15. Joanna Domagała, 2021. "Economic and Environmental Aspects of Agriculture in the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    16. Alicia Fernanda Galindo-Manrique & Esteban Pérez-Calderón & Martha del Pilar Rodríguez-García, 2021. "Eco-Efficiency and Stock Market Volatility: Emerging Markets Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, April.
    17. Figge, Frank & Thorpe, Andrea Stevenson & Good, Jason, 2021. "Us before me: A group level approach to the circular economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    18. Yuxuan Xu & Fengjiao Qiang & Wenchun Luo, 2024. "Investigating the Impact of Heterogeneous Environmental Regulation on the Ecological Efficiency of Industrial Enterprises: A Multivariate Adjustment Approach Using the CLAD Spatial Durbin Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-37, March.
    19. Kounetas, Konstantinos & Stergiou, Eirini, 2019. "Examining eco-efficiency convergence of European Industries.The existence of technological spillovers within a metafrontier framework," MPRA Paper 94286, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Deng, Xiangzheng & Gibson, John, 2019. "Improving eco-efficiency for the sustainable agricultural production: A case study in Shandong, China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 394-400.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ecology; Tourism; Egypt; Environmental Policy; Sustainable Development; Red Sea; Sinai;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:118621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.