IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/117233.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Стандартная Модель Международной Торговли И Теорема Столпера-Самуэльсона: Почему Коррупция Никак Не Влияет На Экономическое Развитие, А От Снижения Торговых Барьеров Больше Всего Страдают Олигархи
[The Standard Model and the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem: On the (Zero) Impact of Corruption on Economic Development]

Author

Listed:
  • Spirin, Victor

Abstract

The standard model of international trade demonstrates the inevitability of deindustrialization of a developing country in the face of premature liberalization of foreign trade with the developed world. This result is a consequence of elementary mathematical optimization and does not depend on the retreat from democratization and glasnost, the rule of law, or the corruption of the economic or political system. In this article, we will especially emphasize the fact that the reasons for the deindustrialization of the Russian economy should not be sought in any inefficiency of the economic system, but corruption, on the contrary, may have been the engine of economic development in historical examples. In addition, from the consideration of the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, it follows that in a developing country with the liberalization of foreign trade, the oligarchs are the most affected class. The reason for this is the huge amount of capital that is completely incommensurable with the stolen, which is given to foreigners: instead of developing our own machine-building, electronic and other high-tech industries, and growing our oligarchs in these industries, all the money was given without a fight to foreign oligarchs.

Suggested Citation

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/117233/1/StolperSamuelson.pdf
File Function: original version
Download Restriction: no
---><---

References listed on IDEAS

as
  1. Wolfgang F. Stolper & Paul A. Samuelson, 1941. "Protection and Real Wages," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 58-73.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Most related items

These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
  1. Dani Rodrik, 2018. "Populism and the economics of globalization," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(1), pages 12-33, June.
  2. Tschopp, Jeanne, 2015. "The Wage Response to Shocks: The Role of Inter-Occupational Labour Adjustment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 28-37.
  3. Kis-Katos, Krisztina & Sparrow, Robert, 2015. "Poverty, labor markets and trade liberalization in Indonesia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 94-106.
  4. Michelle R. Garfinkel & Stergios Skaperdas & Constantinos Syropoulos, 2009. "International Trade and Transnational Insecurity: How Comparative Advantage and Power are Jointly Determined," Working Papers 080921, University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics.
  5. Kim, Hyeongwoo & Thompson, Henry, 2014. "Wages in a factor proportions model with energy input," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 495-501.
  6. Graciela Chichilnisky & Lance Taylor, 1980. "Agriculture and the Rest of the Economy: Macroconnections and Policy Restraints," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(2), pages 303-309.
  7. Amiti, Mary & Cameron, Lisa, 2012. "Trade Liberalization and the Wage Skill Premium: Evidence from Indonesia," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 277-287.
  8. Haas, Levi & Schenk-Hoppé, Klaus R., 2019. "International Trade: Smarten up to talk the talk," MPRA Paper 99096, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  9. Séguin Dulude, Louise, 1986. "Quelques réflexions sur la complémentarité des approches marginaliste et managériale," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 62(2), pages 157-165, juin.
  10. Helpman, Elhanan & Razin, Assaf, 1979. "A Theory of International Trade Under Uncertainty," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780123396501 edited by Shell, Karl.
  11. Hisahiro Naito, 2003. "Atkinson and Stiglitz Theorem with Endogenous Human Capital Accumulation," ISER Discussion Paper 0596, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
  12. Stark, Oded & Kosiorowski, Grzegorz, 2020. "An Adverse Social Welfare Effect of Quadruply Gainful Trade," East Asian Economic Review, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, vol. 24(3), pages 207-235, September.
  13. Isaac K. Ofori & Mark K. Armah & Emmanuel E. Asmah, 2021. "Towards the Reversal of Poverty and Income Inequality Setbacks Due to COVID-19: The Role of Globalisation and Resource Allocation," Working Papers 21/043, European Xtramile Centre of African Studies (EXCAS).
  14. Sampson, Thomas, 2016. "Assignment reversals: Trade, skill allocation and wage inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 365-409.
  15. David Hummels & Jakob R. Munch & Chong Xiang, 2018. "Offshoring and Labor Markets," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 56(3), pages 981-1028, September.
  16. Rod Tyers & Aaron Walker, 2016. "Quantifying Australia's ‘Three-Speed’ Boom," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 49(1), pages 20-43, March.
  17. Mestieri, Martí & Basco, Sergi & Smagghue, Gabriel & Liegey, Maxime, 2020. "The Heterogeneous Effects of Trade across Occupations: A Test of the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem," CEPR Discussion Papers 15186, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  18. Barone, Guglielmo & Kreuter, Helena, 2021. "Low-wage import competition and populist backlash: The case of Italy," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
  19. Mitra, Tapan, 2007. "On Commodity Prices and Factor Rewards: A Close Look at Sign Patterns," Working Papers 07-07, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics.
  20. Henry Thompson, 2013. "Resource Rights and Markets in a General Equilibrium Model of Production," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 56(1), pages 131-139, September.

More about this item

Keywords

Vanek-Reinert effect; free trade; standard model; macroeconomic effect of globalization;
All these keywords.

JEL classification:

  • F6 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization
  • F62 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Macroeconomic Impacts
  • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development

NEP fields

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:117233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.