IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/115440.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysing the impact of the implementation of a blockchain in an existing business model

Author

Abstract

Blockchain technology offers great potential for companies and the number of start-ups whose business models are based on this technology is growing rapidly. However, for many companies already active in their respective markets, the question arises as to whether and how this technology is relevant to their individual business model and what effects an implementation in the company or in the corporate environment would have. These questions can be answered with the help and modification of existing methods and tools. In this paper, we present the method of business model stresstesting, which, with certain adjustments, can help to answer the question of the impact of Blockchain technology on an existing business model. This will help to actively shape and evolve the ecosystem emerging in the area of Blockchain technology. The implementation and further development of the technology based on specific requirements from the business environment is thus facilitated and accelerated.

Suggested Citation

  • Heim, Lars, 2020. "Analysing the impact of the implementation of a blockchain in an existing business model," MPRA Paper 115440, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:115440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/115440/1/MPRA_paper_115440.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harry Bouwman & Jukka Heikkilä & Marikka Heikkilä & Carlo Leopold & Timber Haaker, 2018. "Achieving agility using business model stress testing," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(2), pages 149-162, May.
    2. Niemimaa, Marko & Järveläinen, Jonna & Heikkilä, Marikka & Heikkilä, Jukka, 2019. "Business continuity of business models: Evaluating the resilience of business models for contingencies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 208-216.
    3. Witold Nowiński & Miklós Kozma, 2017. "How Can Blockchain Technology Disrupt the Existing Business Models?," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(3), pages 173-188.
    4. Rayna, Thierry & Striukova, Ludmila, 2016. "From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 214-224.
    5. repec:ecr:col093:31825 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. João Paulo Santos Aragão & Marcele Elisa Fontana, 2022. "Outsourcing Strategies in Public Services under Budgetary Constraints: Analysing Perceptions of Public Managers," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 61-77, March.
    2. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    3. Willems, Kim & Smolders, Annelien & Brengman, Malaika & Luyten, Kris & Schöning, Johannes, 2017. "The path-to-purchase is paved with digital opportunities: An inventory of shopper-oriented retail technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 228-242.
    4. Andreas Engelmann & Gerhard Schwabe, 2024. "Certified data chats for future used car markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Emilio Abad-Segura, 2021. "Sustainable Business Model in the Product-Service System: Analysis of Global Research and Associated EU Legislation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-33, September.
    6. Ukobitz, Desirée Valeria & Faullant, Rita, 2022. "The relative impact of isomorphic pressures on the adoption of radical technology: Evidence from 3D printing," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Kajikawa, Yuya & Mejia, Cristian & Wu, Mengjia & Zhang, Yi, 2022. "Academic landscape of Technological Forecasting and Social Change through citation network and topic analyses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    8. Tilman Santarius & Johanna Pohl & Steffen Lange, 2020. "Digitalization and the Decoupling Debate: Can ICT Help to Reduce Environmental Impacts While the Economy Keeps Growing?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Ben Youssef, Adel & Boubaker, Sabri & Dedaj, But & Carabregu-Vokshi, Mjellma, 2021. "Digitalization of the economy and entrepreneurship intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. Alexander Grünewald & Tan Gürpinar & Carina Culotta & Alicia Guderian, 2024. "Archetypes of blockchain-based business models in enterprise networks," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 633-665, December.
    11. Alexia Athanasopoulou & Mark De Reuver, 2020. "How do business model tools facilitate business model exploration? Evidence from action research," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 495-508, September.
    12. Shivam Gupta & Sachin Modgil & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Serena Strazzullo, 2022. "Additive Manufacturing and Green Information Systems as Technological Capabilities for Firm Performance," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 515-534, December.
    13. Koroth Arun Koyadan & Mazurek Grzegorz & Pater Przemysław, 2019. "Disruptive Innovation in Automotive Retailing," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 27(1), pages 44-59, March.
    14. Meier, Andre & Kock, Alexander, 2021. "Characteristics, Antecedents, and Consequences of Agile R&D Units' Organization - A Conceptual Framework," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 130791, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    15. Chand Bhatt, Priyanka & Kumar, Vimal & Lu, Tzu-Chuen & Daim, Tugrul, 2021. "Technology convergence assessment: Case of blockchain within the IR 4.0 platform," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Beltagui, Ahmad & Sesis, Achilleas & Stylos, Nikolaos, 2021. "A bricolage perspective on democratising innovation: The case of 3D printing in makerspaces," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    17. Pierre-Jean Benghozi & Thierry Rayna & Elisa Salvador & Ludmila Striukova, 2017. "“Editorial” of the "Special Issue on: Leveraging Technological Change: The Role of Business Models and Ecosystems”," Post-Print hal-02537215, HAL.
    18. Nilufer Nilufer & Zeynep Yeni Erol, 2020. "A critical approach to technology-based risks in blockchain system," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 2(1), pages 44-50, January.
    19. Harm-Jan Steenhuis & Xin Fang & Tolga Ulusemre, 2020. "Global Diffusion of Innovation during the Fourth Industrial Revolution: The Case of Additive Manufacturing or 3D Printing," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-34, February.
    20. Rayna, Thierry & Striukova, Ludmila, 2021. "Fostering skills for the 21st century: The role of Fab labs and makerspaces," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    blockchain; business model; stresstesting; stressfactor;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:115440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.