IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/103814.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An experiment in knowledge co-creation on the subsistence entrepreneurial ecosystem of metropolitan La Paz, Bolivia

Author

Listed:
  • Barja Daza, Gover

Abstract

The Ecosistema del Emprendedor por Subsistencia Paceño, in Spanish, is a collection of books produced by the Bolivian Catholic University, with the active participation of graduating students involved in fieldwork research on a common topic of interest. Subsistence entrepreneurship is an important issue in a developing country context like Bolivia where it has not been studied from its ecosystem perspective. The collection concentrates mostly on the metropolitan area of La Paz. This article reviews the knowledge co-creation experiment among graduating students from different careers and their professors in studying and analyzing the La Paz’s subsistence entrepreneurial ecosystem under conditions of research constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Barja Daza, Gover, 2020. "An experiment in knowledge co-creation on the subsistence entrepreneurial ecosystem of metropolitan La Paz, Bolivia," MPRA Paper 103814, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Aug 2020.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:103814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/103814/1/MPRA_paper_103814.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F.C. Stam & Ben Spigel, 2016. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems," Working Papers 16-13, Utrecht School of Economics.
    2. E. Ostrom, 2010. "A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action Presidential Address, American political Science Association, 1997," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 5-52.
    3. Erik Stam & André van Stel, 2009. "Types of Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2009-47, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Janna Alvedalen & Ron Boschma, 2017. "A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 887-903, June.
    5. Zoltán J. Ács & László Szerb & Esteban Lafuente & Ainsley Lloyd, 2018. "The Entrepreneurial Ecosystem," SpringerBriefs in Economics, in: Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2018, chapter 0, pages 1-9, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Franco Arandia Arzabe & Lars Bengtsson & Jazmin Estefania Olivares Ugarte, 2024. "Business Model Innovation Factors of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Bolivia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grégory Guéneau & Didier Chabaud & Marie-Christine Chalus Sauvannet, 2022. "Opening entrepreneurial ecosystem’s black box: the power of networks in African low-income countries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 753-772, June.
    2. Dionisio, Eduardo Avancci & Inácio Júnior, Edmundo & Fischer, Bruno Brandão, 2021. "Country-level efficiency and the index of dynamic entrepreneurship: Contributions from an efficiency approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Jianhong Zhang & Désirée Gorp & Henk Kievit, 2023. "Digital technology and national entrepreneurship: An ecosystem perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1077-1105, June.
    4. Niccolò Ghio & Massimiliano Guerini & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2019. "The creation of high-tech ventures in entrepreneurial ecosystems: exploring the interactions among university knowledge, cooperative banks, and individual attitudes," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 523-543, February.
    5. Wei, Yifan, 2022. "Regional governments and opportunity entrepreneurship in underdeveloped institutional environments: An entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    6. Colin Donaldson, 2021. "Culture in the entrepreneurial ecosystem: a conceptual framing," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 289-319, March.
    7. Birdthistle, Naomi & Eversole, Robyn & Walo, Megerssa, 2022. "Creating an inclusive entrepreneurial ecosystem for women entrepreneurs in a rural region," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    8. Luíza Neves Marques Fonseca & Clarice Secches Kogut & Angela Rocha, 2023. "Anywhere in the World? The Internationalization of Small Entrepreneurial Ventures using a Social Media Platform," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 673-696, August.
    9. Wei, Yifan, 2022. "Reprint of: Regional governments and opportunity entrepreneurship in underdeveloped institutional environments: An entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    10. L Carlos Freire-Gibb & Geoff Gregson, 2019. "Innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Implications for policy and practice in Latin America," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(8), pages 787-806, December.
    11. Noelia, Franco-Leal & Rosalia, Diaz-Carrion, 2020. "A dynamic analysis of the role of entrepreneurial ecosystems in reducing innovation obstacles for startups," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    12. Ellen Loots & Miguel Neiva & Luís Carvalho & Mariangela Lavanga, 2021. "The entrepreneurial ecosystem of cultural and creative industries in Porto: A sub‐ecosystem approach," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 641-662, June.
    13. Charles Mwatsika, 2021. "Reflecting on perceived failure of entrepreneurship development initiatives to help ignite economic development in Malawi," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Fischer, Bruno & Meissner, Dirk & Vonortas, Nicholas & Guerrero, Maribel, 2022. "Spatial features of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 27-36.
    15. Kuebart, Andreas & Ibert, Oliver, 2019. "Beyond territorial conceptions of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The dynamic spatiality of knowledge brokering in seed accelerators," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(2-4), pages 118-133.
    16. François Bousquet & Valérie Barbat, 2021. "Capital social collectif et rites de passage," Post-Print hal-03768511, HAL.
    17. Samir Marwan Hammami & Tareq Muhammad Alhousary & Ahmad Taha Kahwaji & Syed Ahsan Jamil, 2022. "The status quo of omani female entrepreneurs: a story of multidimensional success factors," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2063-2089, August.
    18. Bruce Desmarais, 2012. "Lessons in disguise: multivariate predictive mistakes in collective choice models," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 719-737, June.
    19. Anne-Sophie Merot & Frédérique Grazzini & Jean-Pierre Boissin, 2014. "Gouvernance et développement durable : Le cas de la responsabilité élargie du producteur dans une filière de gestion des déchets," Post-Print halshs-01185814, HAL.
    20. Mariana Pita & Joana Costa & António Carrizo Moreira, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Entrepreneurial Initiative: Building a Multi-Country Taxonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Subsistence entrepreneurship; Social entrepreneurial ecosystems; Research constraints; Research experiments; Knowledge co-creation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A32 - General Economics and Teaching - - Multisubject Collective Works - - - Collective Volumes
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation
    • O54 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Latin America; Caribbean

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:103814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.