IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pdn/dispap/128.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Using Machine Learning to Predict Firms’ Tax Perception

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa Heinemann-Heile

    (Paderborn University)

Abstract

I investigate whether a machine learning model can reliably predict firms’ tax rate perception. While standard models assume that decision-makers in firms are perfectly informed about firms’ tax rates and tax implications, also their tax rate perception influences the way in which they incorporate taxes into their decision-making processes. However, studies examining firms’ tax rate perception and its consequences remain scarce, mostly due to a lack of observations of firms’ tax rate perception. Using a dataset of German SMEs, I apply machine learning in the form of Extreme Gradient Boosting, to predict firms’ tax rate perception based on firm and personal characteristics of the decision-maker. The results show that Extreme Gradient Boosting outperforms traditional OLS regression. The model is highly accurate, as evidenced by a mean prediction error of less than one percentage point, produces reasonably precise predictions, as indicated by the root mean square error being comparable to the standard deviation, and explains up to 23.2% of the variance in firms’ tax rate perception. Even based on firm characteristics only, the model maintains high accuracy, albeit with some decline in precision and explained variance. Consistent with this finding, Shapley values highlight the importance of firm and personal characteristics such as tax compliance costs, tax literacy, and trust in government for the prediction. The results show that machine learning models can provide a time- and cost-effective way to fill the information gap created by the lack of observations on firms’ tax rate perception. This approach allows researchers and policymakers, to further analyze the impact of firms’ tax rate perception on tax reforms, tax compliance, or business decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa Heinemann-Heile, 2024. "Using Machine Learning to Predict Firms’ Tax Perception," Working Papers Dissertations 128, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:pdn:dispap:128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://groups.uni-paderborn.de/wp-wiwi/RePEc/pdf/dispap/DP128.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang Bao & Bin Ke & Bin Li & Y. Julia Yu & Jie Zhang, 2020. "Detecting Accounting Fraud in Publicly Traded U.S. Firms Using a Machine Learning Approach," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 199-235, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Chanyuan (Abigail) & Cho, Soohyun & Vasarhelyi, Miklos, 2022. "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    2. Seth Armitage & Ronan Gallagher & Jiaman Xu, 2023. "The elusive relation between pension discount rates and deficits," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(7-8), pages 1101-1127, July.
    3. Li, Guowen & Wang, Shuai & Feng, Yuyao, 2024. "Making differences work: Financial fraud detection based on multi-subject perceptions," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Jun, So Young & Kim, Dong Sung & Jung, Suk Yoon & Jun, Sang Gyung & Kim, Jong Woo, 2022. "Stock investment strategy combining earnings power index and machine learning," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    5. Vitali, Sonia & Giuliani, Marco, 2024. "Emerging digital technologies and auditing firms: Opportunities and challenges," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    6. Achakzai, Muhammad Atif Khan & Peng, Juan, 2023. "Detecting financial statement fraud using dynamic ensemble machine learning," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    7. Achakzai, Muhammad Atif Khan & Juan, Peng, 2022. "Using machine learning Meta-Classifiers to detect financial frauds," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    8. Wang, Yichen & Hu, Jun & Chen, Jia, 2023. "Does Fintech facilitate cross-border M&As? Evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Yasheng Chen & Zhuojun Wu, 2022. "Financial Fraud Detection of Listed Companies in China: A Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Liu, Wanli, 2024. "Digital transformation and earnings opacity:Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    11. Hanauer, Matthias X. & Kononova, Marina & Rapp, Marc Steffen, 2022. "Boosting agnostic fundamental analysis: Using machine learning to identify mispricing in European stock markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    12. Hanyao Gao & Gang Kou & Haiming Liang & Hengjie Zhang & Xiangrui Chao & Cong-Cong Li & Yucheng Dong, 2024. "Machine learning in business and finance: a literature review and research opportunities," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-35, December.
    13. Stephen Walker, 2021. "Critique of an Article on Machine Learning in the Detection of Accounting Fraud," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 18(1), pages 1-61–70, March.
    14. Wang, Delu & Chen, Fan & Mao, Jinqi & Liu, Nannan & Rong, Fangyu, 2022. "Are the official national data credible? Empirical evidence from statistics quality evaluation of China's coal and its downstream industries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    15. Kexing Ding & Baruch Lev & Xuan Peng & Ting Sun & Miklos A. Vasarhelyi, 2020. "Machine learning improves accounting estimates: evidence from insurance payments," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1098-1134, September.
    16. Li, Jing & Li, Nan & Xia, Tongshui & Guo, Jinjin, 2023. "Textual analysis and detection of financial fraud: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    17. Rahman, Md Jahidur & Zhu, Hongtao, 2024. "Detecting accounting fraud in family firms: Evidence from machine learning approaches," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Yousefi, Hamed & Yung, Kenneth & Najand, Mohammad, 2023. "From low resource slack to inflexibility: The share price effect of operational efficiency," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    19. Md Jahidur Rahman & Hongtao Zhu, 2023. "Predicting accounting fraud using imbalanced ensemble learning classifiers – evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3455-3486, September.
    20. Laure Batz, 2023. "Financial market enforcement in France," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 409-468, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tax Rate Perception; Business Taxation; Prediction; XGBoost; Shapley;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • C8 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pdn:dispap:128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: WP-WiWi-Info (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwpadde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.