IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/bxhrz_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring the Complexity of Urban Form and Design

Author

Listed:
  • Boeing, Geoff

    (Northeastern University)

Abstract

Complex systems have become a popular lens for analyzing cities and complexity theory has many implications for urban performance and resilience. This paper develops a typology of measures and indicators for assessing the physical complexity of the built environment at the scale of urban design. It extends quantitative measures from city planning, network science, ecosystems studies, fractal geometry, statistical physics, and information theory to the analysis of urban form and qualitative human experience. Metrics at multiple scales are scattered throughout diverse bodies of literature and have useful applications in analyzing the adaptive complexity that both evolves and results from local design processes. In turn, they enable urban designers to assess resilience, adaptability, connectedness, and livability with an advanced toolkit. The typology developed here applies to empirical research of various neighborhood types and design standards. It includes temporal, visual, spatial, scaling, and connectivity measures of the urban form. Today, prominent urban design movements openly embrace complexity but must move beyond inspiration and metaphor to formalize what "complexity" is and how we can use it to assess both the world as-is as well as proposals for how it could be instead.

Suggested Citation

  • Boeing, Geoff, 2018. "Measuring the Complexity of Urban Form and Design," SocArXiv bxhrz_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:bxhrz_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/bxhrz_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5900e1306c613b02514e77a7/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/bxhrz_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Dumbaugh & Wenhao Li, 2011. "Designing for the Safety of Pedestrians, Cyclists, and Motorists in Urban Environments," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(1), pages 69-88.
    2. David O’Sullivan & Steven M. Manson, 2015. "Do Physicists Have Geography Envy? And What Can Geographers Learn from It?," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 105(4), pages 704-722, July.
    3. Mike Biddulph, 2012. "The Problem with Thinking about or for Urban Design," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20.
    4. Jiang, Bin, 2016. "A complex-network perspective on Alexander’s wholeness," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 463(C), pages 475-484.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boeing, Geoff, 2018. "Measuring the Complexity of Urban Form and Design," SocArXiv bxhrz, Center for Open Science.
    2. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "Methods and Measures for Analyzing Complex Street Networks and Urban Form," SocArXiv 93h82, Center for Open Science.
    3. Bin Jiang, 2019. "A Recursive Definition of Goodness of Space for Bridging the Concepts of Space and Place for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Jonathan Reades, 2020. "Teaching on Jupyter: Using notebooks to accelerate learning and curriculum development," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 7, pages 21-34.
    5. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "Methods and Measures for Analyzing Complex Street Networks and Urban Form," SocArXiv 93h82_v1, Center for Open Science.
    6. Rebekka E. Apardian & Oleg Smirnov, 2020. "An analysis of pedestrian crashes using a spatial count data model," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(5), pages 1317-1338, October.
    7. Yue Dou & Guolin Yao & Anna Herzberger & Ramon Felipe Bicudo da Silva & Qian Song & Ciara Hovis & Mateus Batistella & Emilio Moran & Wenbin Wu & Jianguo Liu, 2020. "Land-Use Changes in Distant Places: Implementation of a Telecoupled Agent-Based Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 23(1), pages 1-11.
    8. Ben Derudder & Zachary Neal, 2018. "Uncovering Links Between Urban Studies and Network Science," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 441-446, September.
    9. An, Li & Grimm, Volker & Sullivan, Abigail & Turner II, B.L. & Malleson, Nicolas & Heppenstall, Alison & Vincenot, Christian & Robinson, Derek & Ye, Xinyue & Liu, Jianguo & Lindkvist, Emilie & Tang, W, 2021. "Challenges, tasks, and opportunities in modeling agent-based complex systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).
    10. Justus Uitermark & Michiel van Meeteren, 2021. "Geographical Network Analysis," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(4), pages 337-350, September.
    11. Chen, Li & Chen, Cynthia & Ewing, Reid, 2014. "The relative effectiveness of signal related pedestrian countermeasures at urban intersections—Lessons from a New York City case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 69-78.
    12. Soltani, Ali & Roohani Qadikolaei, Mohsen, 2024. "Space-time analysis of accident frequency and the role of built environment in mitigation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 189-205.
    13. Ben Derudder, 2021. "Network Analysis of ‘Urban Systems’: Potential, Challenges, and Pitfalls," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(4), pages 404-420, September.
    14. Zaheer Allam & Simon Elias Bibri & Didier Chabaud & Carlos Moreno, 2022. "The Theoretical, Practical, and Technological Foundations of the 15-Minute City Model: Proximity and Its Environmental, Social and Economic Benefits for Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Tanja Congiu & Giovanni Sotgiu & Paolo Castiglia & Antonio Azara & Andrea Piana & Laura Saderi & Marco Dettori, 2019. "Built Environment Features and Pedestrian Accidents: An Italian Retrospective Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Chia-Yuan Yu, 2015. "Built Environmental Designs in Promoting Pedestrian Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Zaheer Allam & Simon Elias Bibri & Didier Chabaud & Carlos Moreno, 2022. "The Theoretical, Practical, and Technological Foundations of the 15-Minute City Model: Proximity and Its Environmental, Social and Economic Benefits for Sustainability," Post-Print hal-03997394, HAL.
    18. Fangjie Cao & Yun Qiu & Qianxin Wang & Yan Zou, 2022. "Urban Form and Function Optimization for Reducing Carbon Emissions Based on Crowd-Sourced Spatio-Temporal Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Stefano Cozzolino, 2020. "The (anti) adaptive neighbourhoods. Embracing complexity and distribution of design control in the ordinary built environment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 203-219, February.
    20. Kadali, B Raghuram & Vedagiri, P., 2015. "Evaluation of pedestrian crosswalk level of service (LOS) in perspective of type of land-use," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 113-124.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:bxhrz_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.