IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/7esb9_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gender and Gender-Role Attitudes in Wage Negotiations: Evidence from an Online Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Demirović, Melisa
  • Rogers, Jonathan
  • Robbins, Blaine G

    (New York University Abu Dhabi)

Abstract

Gender differences in wage negotiations is a popular explanation for why the gender gap in pay persists in the United States. In this study, we use data from an artificial wage negotiation experiment (N = 307) to examine the relationship between gender and wage negotiations, and to test whether gender-role attitudes moderate this relationship. We find that gender-role attitudes moderate how gender influences the decision to negotiate, but not the outcomes of negotiations, and that forced negotiations do not lead to additional gains for women, regardless of their gender-role attitudes. We conclude with a discussion of implications and directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Demirović, Melisa & Rogers, Jonathan & Robbins, Blaine G, 2022. "Gender and Gender-Role Attitudes in Wage Negotiations: Evidence from an Online Experiment," SocArXiv 7esb9_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:7esb9_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/7esb9_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/622706ab1e399c05d3600af5/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/7esb9_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:7esb9_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.