IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/36r2d.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Integrating Semantic Directions with Concept Mover's Distance to Measure Binary Concept Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Taylor, Marshall A.

    (New Mexico State University)

  • Stoltz, Dustin S.

    (University of Notre Dame)

Abstract

In an earlier article published in this journal ("Concept Mover’s Distance,” 2019), we proposed a method for measuring concept engagement in texts that uses word embeddings to find the minimum cost necessary for words in an observed document to "travel" to words in a "pseudo-document" consisting only of words denoting a concept of interest. One potential limitation we noted is that, because words associated with opposing concepts will be located close to one another in the embedding space, documents will likely have similar closeness to starkly opposing concepts (e.g., "life" and "death"). Using aggregate vector differences between antonym pairs to extract a direction in the semantic space pointing toward a pole of the binary opposition (following "The Geometry of Culture," American Sociological Review, 2019), we illustrate how CMD can be used to measure a document"s engagement with binary concepts.

Suggested Citation

  • Taylor, Marshall A. & Stoltz, Dustin S., 2020. "Integrating Semantic Directions with Concept Mover's Distance to Measure Binary Concept Engagement," SocArXiv 36r2d, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:36r2d
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/36r2d
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5ef6383c9fceff008b82d604/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/36r2d?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikhil Garg & Londa Schiebinger & Dan Jurafsky & James Zou, 2018. "Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(16), pages 3635-3644, April.
    2. Dustin S. Stoltz & Marshall A. Taylor, 2019. "Concept Mover’s Distance: measuring concept engagement via word embeddings in texts," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 293-313, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra & Prithviraj Pahwa, 2022. "The Extended Computational Case Method: A Framework for Research Design," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(4), pages 1826-1867, November.
    2. Andrea Voyer & Zachary D. Kline & Madison Danton & Tatiana Volkova, 2022. "From Strange to Normal: Computational Approaches to Examining Immigrant Incorporation Through Shifts in the Mainstream," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(4), pages 1540-1579, November.
    3. Taylor, Marshall A. & Stoltz, Dustin S., 2024. "A Workflow for Analyzing Cultural Schemas in Texts," SocArXiv zvwn2, Center for Open Science.
    4. Stijn Daenekindt & Julian Schaap, 2022. "Using word embedding models to capture changing media discourses: a study on the role of legitimacy, gender and genre in 24,000 music reviews, 1999–2021," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1615-1636, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marshall A. Taylor & Dustin S. Stoltz, 2021. "Integrating semantic directions with concept mover’s distance to measure binary concept engagement," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 231-242, May.
    2. Kun Sun & Rong Wang, 2022. "The Evolutionary Pattern of Language in English Fiction Over the Last Two Centuries: Insights From Linguistic Concreteness and Imageability," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    3. Stefan Feuerriegel & Mateusz Dolata & Gerhard Schwabe, 2020. "Fair AI," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(4), pages 379-384, August.
    4. Ash, Elliott & Durante, Ruben & Grebenshchikova, Mariia & Schwarz, Carlo, 2022. "Visual Representation and Stereotypes in News Media," CEPR Discussion Papers 16624, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Martin Baumgaertner & Johannes Zahner, 2021. "Whatever it takes to understand a central banker - Embedding their words using neural networks," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202130, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    6. Duede, Eamon & Teplitskiy, Misha & Lakhani, Karim & Evans, James, 2024. "Being together in place as a catalyst for scientific advance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    7. Dustin S. Stoltz & Marshall A. Taylor, 2019. "Concept Mover’s Distance: measuring concept engagement via word embeddings in texts," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 293-313, July.
    8. Kun Sun & Haitao Liu & Wenxin Xiong, 2021. "The evolutionary pattern of language in scientific writings: A case study of Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society (1665–1869)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1695-1724, February.
    9. Alex Luscombe & Kevin Dick & Kevin Walby, 2022. "Algorithmic thinking in the public interest: navigating technical, legal, and ethical hurdles to web scraping in the social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1023-1044, June.
    10. Haochuan Cui & Tiewei Li & Cheng-Jun Wang, 2023. "Climbing up the ladder of abstraction: how to span the boundaries of knowledge space in the online knowledge market?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Batabyal, Amitrajeet & Nijkamp, Peter, 2022. "Introduction to The Creative Class Revisited: New Analytical Advances," MPRA Paper 114163, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Aug 2022.
    12. Stijn Daenekindt & Julian Schaap, 2022. "Using word embedding models to capture changing media discourses: a study on the role of legitimacy, gender and genre in 24,000 music reviews, 1999–2021," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1615-1636, November.
    13. Diego Kozlowski & Jennifer Dusdal & Jun Pang & Andreas Zilian, 2021. "Semantic and relational spaces in science of science: deep learning models for article vectorisation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 5881-5910, July.
    14. Sandeep Soni & Kristina Lerman & Jacob Eisenstein, 2021. "Follow the leader: Documents on the leading edge of semantic change get more citations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(4), pages 478-492, April.
    15. Quariguasi Frota Neto, João & Dutordoir, Marie, 2020. "Mapping the market for remanufacturing: An application of “Big Data” analytics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    16. Sudeep Bhatia, 2019. "Predicting Risk Perception: New Insights from Data Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3800-3823, August.
    17. Huimin Xu & Zhang Zhang & Lingfei Wu & Cheng-Jun Wang, 2019. "The Cinderella Complex: Word embeddings reveal gender stereotypes in movies and books," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Ahmed Abbasi & Jeffrey Parsons & Gautam Pant & Olivia R. Liu Sheng & Suprateek Sarker, 2024. "Pathways for Design Research on Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 441-459, June.
    19. Antonio De Nicola & Gregorio D’Agostino, 2021. "Assessment of gender divide in scientific communities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 3807-3840, May.
    20. Kim, Jae Yeon, 2021. "Power, Hate Speech, Machine Learning, and Intersectional Approach," SocArXiv chvgp, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:36r2d. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.