IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/2p38n.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Progressive-left security and conservative-right distance - How democracy can save itself from populism

Author

Listed:
  • Richter, Dirk

    (Bern University Hospital for Mental Health)

  • Richter, Mona

Abstract

Democracy is under threat in many countries, particularly from illiberal and right-wing populist parties. This does not reveal a social trend towards conservatism and right-wing to far-right positions among the population, as moral and social attitudes are generally becoming increasingly liberalised. The shift to the right is primarily taking place within the political system, where right-wing conservative and illiberal parties are recognising insecurities among the population and taking up certain trigger topics (e.g. migration, climate, gender and identity issues) in order to increase their share of the vote. To put it in economic terms: The shift to the right does not follow a demand from the voting population, but follows a supply by political parties. Political systems can therefore react accordingly and counter populist positions appropriately. Progressive-left parties can do this by ensuring that the issues and positions they launch do not exacerbate social insecurities, while conservative-right parties can do this by maintaining a clear distance from illiberal positions in terms of content and rhetoric.

Suggested Citation

  • Richter, Dirk & Richter, Mona, 2024. "Progressive-left security and conservative-right distance - How democracy can save itself from populism," SocArXiv 2p38n, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:2p38n
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/2p38n
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6660c16f0f8c80098d3c95a7/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/2p38n?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alia Braley & Gabriel S. Lenz & Dhaval Adjodah & Hossein Rahnama & Alex Pentland, 2023. "Why voters who value democracy participate in democratic backsliding," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 1282-1293, August.
    2. Kirk Bansak & Jens Hainmueller & Dominik Hangartner, 2023. "Europeans’ support for refugees of varying background is stable over time," Nature, Nature, vol. 620(7975), pages 849-854, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristina Cattaneo & Daniela Grieco & Nicola Lacetera & Mario Macis, 2024. "Out-group Penalties in Refugee Assistance: A Survey Experiment," NBER Working Papers 32139, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Brummel, Lars & Toshkov, Dimiter, 2024. "When Should Governments Listen to Social Protests? The Effects of Public Support and Outcome Favorability," OSF Preprints neh5u, Center for Open Science.
    3. Gilad, Sharon & Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Raanan & Levi-Faur, David, 2024. "Partisan Alignment and the Propensity to Choose a Job in a Government Ministry," SocArXiv ufzcj, Center for Open Science.
    4. Ximeng Fang & Sven Heuser & Lasse S. Stötzer, 2023. "How In-Person Conversations Shape Political Polarization: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from a Nationwide Initiative," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 270, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    5. Patrick Francois & Chris Bidner, 2024. "The Problem with Authoritarian Populists," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 12(1), pages 59-73, April.
    6. Brandon Parsons, 2024. "Political Polarization and Internal Conflict: A Cross-National Analysis Using Popular Support and Government Cohesion as Proxies," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(1), pages 15-27, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:2p38n. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.