IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/x82yh_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Crime and Punishment: Adam Smith’s Theory of Sentimental Law and Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Paganelli, Maria Pia
  • Simon, Fabrizio

Abstract

For Adam Smith a crime is not the result of a rational calculation of loss and gain, but the consequence of envy and a vain desire to parade wealth to attract the approbation of others, combined with a natural systematic bias in overestimating the probability of success. Similarly, Smith does not conceive of legal sanctions as a rational deterrent, but as deriving from the feeling of resentment. While the prevailing approach of the eighteenth century is a rational explanation of crime and a utilitarian use of punishment, Adam Smith instead builds his theory of criminal behavior and legal prosecution consistently on the sentiments. A well-functioning legal system is thus an unintended consequence of our desire to bring justice to the individual person, not the result of a rational calculation to promote the public good, just like a well-functioning economic system is the unintended consequence of our desire to better our own condition, not the result of a rational calculation to promote public good.

Suggested Citation

  • Paganelli, Maria Pia & Simon, Fabrizio, 2020. "Crime and Punishment: Adam Smith’s Theory of Sentimental Law and Economics," OSF Preprints x82yh_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:x82yh_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/x82yh_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5f73487046080903f31b6bee/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/x82yh_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amos Witztum & Jeffrey T. Young, 2013. "Utilitarianism and the role of utility in Adam Smith," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 572-602, August.
    2. Fiori, Stefano, 2012. "Adam Smith On Method: Newtonianism, History, Institutions, And The “Invisible Hand”," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 411-435, September.
    3. Redman, Deborah A, 1993. "Adam Smith and Isaac Newton," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 40(2), pages 210-230, May.
    4. Warren J. Samuels & Steven G. Medema, 2005. "Freeing Smith from the “Free Market†: On the Misperception of Adam Smith on the Economic Role of Government," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 37(2), pages 219-226, Summer.
    5. Mizuta, Hiroshi, 2000. "Adam Smith's Library: A Catalogue," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198285908.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paganelli, Maria Pia & Simon, Fabrizio & Assistant, JHET, 2020. "Crime and Punishment: Adam Smith’s Theory of Sentimental Law and Economics," OSF Preprints x82yh, Center for Open Science.
    2. Warren Samuels, 2007. "The interrelations between legal and economic processes: a consideration of the reactions," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 243-285, December.
    3. Madarász, Aladár, 2014. "A láthatatlan kéz - szemelvények egy metafora történetéből [The invisible hand - extracts from the history of a metaphor]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 801-844.
    4. Erhard Glötzl & Florentin Glötzl & Oliver Richters, 2019. "From constrained optimization to constrained dynamics: extending analogies between economics and mechanics," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 14(3), pages 623-642, September.
    5. Kremser Christian E. W., 2018. "Positive Wirtschaftsanalyse oder normativer Wirtschaftsentwurf?: Adam Smiths kommerzielle Gesellschaft als wirtschaftspolitische Utopie," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 67(2), pages 219-245, August.
    6. Amos Witztum, 2016. "Experimental Economics, Game Theory and Das Adam Smith Problem," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 42(4), pages 528-556, September.
    7. Betsy Jane Clary, 2009. "Smith and Living Wages: Arguments in Support of a Mandated Living Wage," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(5), pages 1063-1084, November.
    8. Matthias P. Hühn & Claus Dierksmeier, 2016. "Will the Real A. Smith Please Stand Up!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 119-132, June.
    9. Flavia Di Mario & Andrea Micocci, 2017. "Smith’s invisible hand: controversy is needed," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 53-82, November.
    10. Glötzl, Erhard & Glötzl, Florentin & Richters, Oliver & Binter, Lucas, 2023. "General Constrained Dynamic Models in Economics - General Dynamic Theory of Economic Variables - Beyond Walras and Keynes," MPRA Paper 118314, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Tony Aspromourgos, 2011. "Adam Smith and the Division of Labour among the Social Sciences," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 81-94.
    12. Bernardo Carvajal Sánchez (Editor) & Aníbal Zarate Pérez (Editor), 2023. "Balance y desafíos del Estado regulador, supervisor, promotor y empresario: XXIV Jornadas Internacionales de Derecho Administrativo. Tomo I, Acción pública económica y Estado regulador," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1390.
    13. Glötzl, Erhard, 2015. "Why and How to overcome General Equilibrium Theory," MPRA Paper 66265, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. David Andrews, 2014. "Adam Smith's Natural Prices, the Gravitation Metaphor, and the Purposes of Nature," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.
    15. Hiroshi Mizuta, 2019. "Adam Smith's Library: General Check-List and Index," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 16(2), pages 374–474-3, September.
    16. Nicola Giocoli, 2019. "The classical limits to police power and the economic foundations of the Slaughterhouse dissents," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 407-437, December.
    17. Levy, David M, 2021. "Statistical discrimination when group members are aware of their stereotype: Learning from David Hume and Adam Smith," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 86-93.
    18. Richard van den Berg, 2017. "A judicious and industrious compiler’: Mapping Postlethwayt's," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 1167-1213, November.
    19. Matthew T. Clements, 2013. "Self-Interest vs. Greed and the Limitations of the Invisible Hand," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 949-965, October.
    20. Samuel Hollander, 2016. "Ethical Utilitarianism and The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Adam Smith in Relation to Hume and Bentham," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 42(4), pages 557-580, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:x82yh_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.