IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/ugsjh.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Digital Transformation in Orchestras. Key Learnings from Case Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Salvaggio, Salvino A.

Abstract

This brief case study review explores the digital transformation journeys of renowned orchestras worldwide, highlighting key learnings and strategies. The paper examines five case studies from international orchestras. These institutions have used digital platforms, data analytics, and innovative technologies to enhance audience engagement, expand reach, and improve operational efficiency. The findings emphasise the importance of digital transformation for long-term sustainability and competitiveness in the performing arts. Key insights include the potential for increased global audience engagement, diversified revenue streams, and enhanced customer experiences through data-driven strategies. Case studies were built upon publicly available material rather than official documents or interviews, which may imply some imprecision.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvaggio, Salvino A., 2024. "Digital Transformation in Orchestras. Key Learnings from Case Studies," OSF Preprints ugsjh, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:ugsjh
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/ugsjh
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/66728dfce02bac0084b21971/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/ugsjh?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulziibadrakh Zoljargal, 2022. "The Impact Of Covid-19 Pandemic On The Marketing Of The Performing Arts," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 7(special), pages 120-130, June.
    2. Andrew Leyshon, 2009. "The Software Slump?: Digital Music, the Democratisation of Technology, and the Decline of the Recording Studio Sector within the Musical Economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(6), pages 1309-1331, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hendrickson, Michael & Stanley Niaah, Sonjah, 2018. "A study on the creative industry as a pillar of sustained growth and diversification : the film and music sectors in Jamaica : lessons from case studies of successful firms and ventures," Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for The Caribbean 43410, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. Arthur Price, 2016. "Leveraging Technology to Bridge the Gap between Independent Artists and Reaching the Right Consumer," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 2(2), pages 136-160, July.
    3. Yongren Shi & Yisook Lim & Chan S Suh, 2018. "Innovation or deviation? The relationship between boundary crossing and audience evaluation in the music field," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Rémy Guichardaz & Laurent Bach & Julien Penin, 2019. "Music industry intermediation in the digital era and the resilience of the Majors’ oligopoly: the role of transactional capability," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 843-869, August.
    5. Rüling, Charles-Clemens & Duymedjian, Raffi, 2014. "Digital bricolage: Resources and coordination in the production of digital visual effects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 98-110.
    6. Warr, Richard & Goode, Mark M.H., 2011. "Is the music industry stuck between rock and a hard place? The role of the Internet and three possible scenarios," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 126-131.
    7. Allan Watson & Jonathan V Beaverstock, 2016. "Transnational freelancing: Ephemeral creative projects and mobility in the music recording industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(7), pages 1428-1446, July.
    8. von Krogh, Georg & Geilinger, Nina, 2014. "Knowledge creation in the eco-system: Research imperatives," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 155-163.
    9. Orçun Kasap & Altug Yalcintas, 2021. "Commodification 2.0: How Does Spotify Provide Its Services for Free?," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 157-172, March.
    10. Rémy Guichardaz & Laurent Bach & Julien Penin, 2016. "Music industry intermediation in the digital era and the resilience of the majors’ oligopoly: The role of transactional capabilities," Working Papers of BETA 2016-47, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:ugsjh. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.