IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/tyxnf_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can a local model for social prescribing be successfully recreated in different areas? Lessons from a co-production initiative in Nottinghamshire

Author

Listed:
  • Charles, Sarah Jane

    (Nottingham Trent University)

  • Champion, Donna
  • Stevenson, Clifford

Abstract

This research explored how to take a successful and established approach for creating place-based opportunities for Social Prescribing (referred to as the “Inspiring A” model) from one district in Nottinghamshire and recreate the same approach in two different districts. The Inspiring A model set up by a Community Voluntary Action group successfully co-ordinated a diverse range of third sector partners to provide a calendar of activities and events for residents, enriching social prescribing provision and enhancing the place-identity of the locale. The research described here undertook to recreate the Inspiring A model in two additional Nottinghamshire districts through co-design and co-production with local stakeholders. The aim was to use the Inspiring A model approach to improving social prescribing provision and local connectedness to achieve the same outcomes in different Nottinghamshire districts. The paper sets out our approach to co-design and co-production and discusses some of the challenges which communities have to overcome to successfully support social prescribing services.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles, Sarah Jane & Champion, Donna & Stevenson, Clifford, 2024. "Can a local model for social prescribing be successfully recreated in different areas? Lessons from a co-production initiative in Nottinghamshire," OSF Preprints tyxnf_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:tyxnf_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/tyxnf_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/65f3b7064dfd8c119027fdab/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/tyxnf_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D Champion & J M Wilson, 2010. "The impact of contingency factors on validation of problem structuring methods," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(9), pages 1420-1431, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smith, Chris M. & Shaw, Duncan, 2019. "The characteristics of problem structuring methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 403-416.
    2. Mojtaba Ashja & Ali Rezaeian, 2024. "Pluralistic Causal Mapping: A Postmodern Systems Thinking Approach Regarding Identification of a Causal Map of Social Complex Systems," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 1101-1121, December.
    3. Gregory, Amanda J. & Atkins, Jonathan P. & Midgley, Gerald & Hodgson, Anthony M., 2020. "Stakeholder identification and engagement in problem structuring interventions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 321-340.
    4. Shavindrie Cooray & Donna Champion, 2023. "A systems approach to enabling student‐led critical discussion," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 429-436, May.
    5. Shaw, Duncan & Smith, Chris M. & Scully, Judy, 2017. "Why did Brexit happen? Using causal mapping to analyse secondary, longitudinal data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 1019-1032.
    6. Midgley, Gerald & Cavana, Robert Y. & Brocklesby, John & Foote, Jeff L. & Wood, David R.R. & Ahuriri-Driscoll, Annabel, 2013. "Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 143-154.
    7. Mahmoud Dehghan Nayeri & Moein Khazaei & Fatemeh Alinasab-Imani, 2020. "The Critical Heuristics of Iranian Banking Credit System: Analysis of the Antithetical Opinions of the Beneficiaries," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 363-392, June.
    8. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm, 2022. "Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 55-88, February.
    9. Simon Bell & Sami Mahroum & Nasser Yassin, 2017. "Towards understanding problem structuring and groups with triple task methodology ‘e’," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(2), pages 192-206, February.
    10. Champion, Donna, 2018. "A case analysis for PEArL: Software on wheels," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 93-97.
    11. Shaw, Duncan & Smith, Chris M. & Scully, Judy, 2019. "From Brexit to Article 50: Applying Critical Realism to the design and analysis of a longitudinal causal mapping study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 723-735.
    12. Annielli A R Cunha & Danielle C Morais, 2016. "Analysing the use of cognitive maps in an experiment on a group decision process," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(12), pages 1459-1468, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:tyxnf_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.