IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/qwdxs.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Party Control as a Context for Homophily in Collaborations among US House Representatives, 1981 -- 2015

Author

Listed:
  • Neal, Zachary
  • Domagalski, Rachel
  • Yan, Xiaoqin

Abstract

Effective lawmaking requires collaboration among legislators, who form coalitions to advance their legislative agendas. In the US House of Representatives, these collaborations develop in a context of shifting political party control. In this paper we explore how legislators' party and gender identities simultaneously influence whom they choose as collaborators by examining differential party and gender homophily during a period of shifting party control and increasing representation of women. We introduce new methods for inferring legislative collaboration networks from bill co-sponsorship data, then estimate cross-sectional logistic regression models on these networks from 1981 -- 2015. We find evidence of differential homophily by both party and gender: Republicans and women tend to prefer same-party and same-gender political collaborators more than Democrats and men. However, party homophily (i.e. partisanship) is stronger than gender homophily, suggesting that party is a more salient identity for legislators than gender.

Suggested Citation

  • Neal, Zachary & Domagalski, Rachel & Yan, Xiaoqin, 2020. "Party Control as a Context for Homophily in Collaborations among US House Representatives, 1981 -- 2015," OSF Preprints qwdxs, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:qwdxs
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/qwdxs
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5fca5a44aa60b80232896f9e/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/qwdxs?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craig Volden & Alan E. Wiseman & Dana E. Wittmer, 2013. "When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers Than Men?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(2), pages 326-341, April.
    2. Ringe, Nils & Victor, Jennifer Nicoll & Gross, Justin H., 2013. "Keeping Your Friends Close and Your Enemies Closer? Information Networks in Legislative Politics," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 601-628, July.
    3. Fowler, James H., 2006. "Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 456-487, October.
    4. Eduardo Alemán & Ernesto Calvo, 2013. "Explaining Policy Ties in Presidential Congresses: A Network Analysis of Bill Initiation Data," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 61(2), pages 356-377, June.
    5. Zhang, Yan & Friend, A.J. & Traud, Amanda L. & Porter, Mason A. & Fowler, James H. & Mucha, Peter J., 2008. "Community structure in Congressional cosponsorship networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(7), pages 1705-1712.
    6. Hong, Yili, 2013. "On computing the distribution function for the Poisson binomial distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 41-51.
    7. Moody, James & Mucha, Peter J., 2013. "Portrait of Political Party Polarization – ERRATUM," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 251-251, August.
    8. Hunter, David R. & Handcock, Mark S. & Butts, Carter T. & Goodreau, Steven M. & Morris, Martina, 2008. "ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 24(i03).
    9. Moody, James & Mucha, Peter J., 2013. "Portrait of Political Party Polarization1," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 119-121, April.
    10. Stefano Gagliarducci & M Daniele Paserman, 2022. "Gender Differences in Cooperative Environments? Evidence from The U.S. Congress," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(641), pages 218-257.
    11. Sarah F. Anzia & Christopher R. Berry, 2011. "The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 478-493, July.
    12. Kessler, Daniel & Krehbiel, Keith, 1996. "Dynamics of Cosponsorship," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 90(3), pages 555-566, September.
    13. Bruce A Desmarais & Skyler J Cranmer, 2012. "Statistical Inference for Valued-Edge Networks: The Generalized Exponential Random Graph Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Clio Andris & David Lee & Marcus J Hamilton & Mauro Martino & Christian E Gunning & John Armistead Selden, 2015. "The Rise of Partisanship and Super-Cooperators in the U.S. House of Representatives," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huremović, Kenan & Ozkes, Ali I., 2022. "Polarization in networks: Identification–alienation framework," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Lee, Jihui & Li, Gen & Wilson, James D., 2020. "Varying-coefficient models for dynamic networks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Jäckle Sebastian & Metz Thomas, 2019. "Oral Questions in the European Parliament: A Network Analysis," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 87-113, December.
    4. Natasha Kossovsky & Kathleen M. Carley, 2020. "The collapse of the second Yatsenyuk government: roll call vote and dynamic network analysis," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 123-143, March.
    5. Marco Battaglini & Valerio Leone Sciabolazza & Eleonora Patacchini, 2020. "Effectiveness of Connected Legislators," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 739-756, October.
    6. David Laband & Richard Seals & Eric Wilbrandt, 2015. "On the importance of inequality in politics: duplicate bills and bill co-sponsorship in the US House of Representatives," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 353-378, November.
    7. Baek, Seung Ki & Kim, Jonghoon & Lee, Song Sub & Jo, Woo Seong & Kim, Beom Jun, 2020. "Co-sponsorship analysis of party politics in the 20th National Assembly of Republic of Korea," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    8. Desmarais, B.A. & Cranmer, S.J., 2012. "Statistical mechanics of networks: Estimation and uncertainty," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(4), pages 1865-1876.
    9. Marco Battaglini & Eleonora Patacchini & Edoardo Rainone, 2019. "Endogenous Social Connections in Legislatures," NBER Working Papers 25988, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Darko Cherepnalkoski & Andreas Karpf & Igor Mozetič & Miha Grčar, 2016. "Cohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, November.
    11. Shamena Anwar & Patrick Bayer & Randi Hjalmarsson, 2019. "A Jury of Her Peers: The Impact of the First Female Jurors on Criminal Convictions," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(618), pages 603-650.
    12. Stefano Gagliarducci & M Daniele Paserman, 2022. "Gender Differences in Cooperative Environments? Evidence from The U.S. Congress," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(641), pages 218-257.
    13. Raul Magni Berton & Sophie Panel, 2017. "Strategic gerontocracy: why nondemocratic systems produce older leaders," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 409-427, June.
    14. Michael W Kraus & Bennett Callaghan, 2014. "Noblesse Oblige? Social Status and Economic Inequality Maintenance among Politicians," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-6, January.
    15. Sandipan Roy & Yves Atchadé & George Michailidis, 2017. "Change point estimation in high dimensional Markov random-field models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(4), pages 1187-1206, September.
    16. Chauvin, Juan Pablo & Tricaud, Clemence, 2022. "Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Crisis Response," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12411, Inter-American Development Bank.
    17. Kyungjin Yoo & Seth Blumsack, 2018. "The Political Complexity of Regional Electricity Policy Formation," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-18, December.
    18. Jillian D. Chown & Christopher C. Liu, 2015. "Geography and power in an organizational forum: Evidence from the U.S. Senate Chamber," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 177-196, February.
    19. Shamena Anwar & Patrick Bayer & Randi Hjalmarsson, 2019. "A Jury of Her Peers: The Impact of the First Female Jurors on Criminal Convictions," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(618), pages 603-650.
    20. Marie Courtemanche & Joanne Connor Green, 2017. "The Influence of Women Legislators on State Health Care Spending for the Poor," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-24, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:qwdxs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.