IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/jt47m.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Workplace inclusion of people with disability: recommendations from an umbrella review

Author

Listed:
  • Ratcliffe, Sarah E Dr.

    (University of NSW Sydney)

  • Bergman, Jessica
  • Harvey-Smith, Lisa
  • Williams, Lisa A.

    (University of New South Wales)

Abstract

This registration is a report of the findings of an umbrella review of workplace equity and inclusion initiatives for people with disability. The review follows a preregistered protocol and expert guidelines to systematically identify initiatives for workplace disability inclusion with the strongest evidence. This report provides findings and recommendations for improving workplace equity and inclusion of people with disability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ratcliffe, Sarah E Dr. & Bergman, Jessica & Harvey-Smith, Lisa & Williams, Lisa A., 2024. "Workplace inclusion of people with disability: recommendations from an umbrella review," OSF Preprints jt47m, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:jt47m
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/jt47m
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/665819cbd835c4225c4cdf35/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/jt47m?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shae Wissell & Leila Karimi & Tanya Serry & Lisa Furlong & Judith Hudson, 2022. "Leading Diverse Workforces: Perspectives from Managers and Employers about Dyslexic Employees in Australian Workplaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Priyanka Anand & Purvi Sevak, 2017. "The role of workplace accommodations in the employment of people with disabilities," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Carla Sabariego & Michaela Coenen & Elizabeth Ito & Klemens Fheodoroff & Chiara Scaratti & Matilde Leonardi & Anastasia Vlachou & Panayiota Stavroussi & Valentina Brecelj & Dare S. Kovačič & Eva Esteb, 2018. "Effectiveness of Integration and Re-Integration into Work Strategies for Persons with Chronic Conditions: A Systematic Review of European Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-34, March.
    4. Markussen, Simen & Mykletun, Arnstein & Røed, Knut, 2012. "The case for presenteeism — Evidence from Norway's sickness insurance program," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 959-972.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Arni & Gerard J. van den Berg & Rafael Lalive, 2022. "Treatment Versus Regime Effects of Carrots and Sticks," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 111-127, January.
    2. Stefan Pichler & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2015. "The Pros and Cons of Sick Pay Schemes: Testing for Contagious Presenteeism and Shirking Behavior," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1509, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Rainer Eppel & Thomas Leoni & Helmut Mahringer, 2016. "Österreich 2025 – Gesundheit und Beschäftigungsfähigkeit. Status quo, internationale Erfahrungen und Reformperspektiven," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58794, August.
    4. Aline Bütikofer & Meghan M. Skira, 2018. "Missing Work Is a Pain: The Effect of Cox-2 Inhibitors on Sickness Absence and Disability Pension Receipt," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 53(1), pages 71-122.
    5. Ahn, Thomas & Yelowitz, Aaron, 2016. "Paid Sick Leave and Absenteeism: The First Evidence from the U.S," MPRA Paper 69794, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Pichler, Stefan & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2017. "The pros and cons of sick pay schemes: Testing for contagious presenteeism and noncontagious absenteeism behavior," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 14-33.
    7. Anja M S Ariansen & Arnstein Mykletun, 2014. "Does Postponement of First Pregnancy Increase Gender Differences in Sickness Absence? A Register Based Analysis of Norwegian Employees in 1993–2007," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Hernæs, Øystein, 2018. "Activation against absenteeism – Evidence from a sickness insurance reform in Norway," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 60-68.
    9. Kools, Lieke & Koning, Pierre, 2019. "Graded return-to-work as a stepping stone to full work resumption," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 189-209.
    10. Soja Nazarov & Ulf Manuwald & Matilde Leonardi & Fabiola Silvaggi & Jérôme Foucaud & Kristopher Lamore & Erika Guastafierro & Chiara Scaratti & Jaana Lindström & Ulrike Rothe, 2019. "Chronic Diseases and Employment: Which Interventions Support the Maintenance of Work and Return to Work among Workers with Chronic Illnesses? A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    11. Stefan Pichler & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2020. "Labor Market Effects of U.S. Sick Pay Mandates," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 55(2), pages 611-659.
    12. Chandola, Tarani & Rouxel, Patrick, 2021. "The role of workplace accommodations in explaining the disability employment gap in the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    13. Kai Rehwald & Michael Rosholm & Bénédicte Rouland, 2015. "Does Activating Sick-Listed Workers Work? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment," Working Papers hal-01228454, HAL.
    14. Richard V. Burkhauser & Mary C. Daly & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2016. "Protecting working-age people with disabilities: experiences of four industrialized nations [Absicherung von Personen mit Erwerbsminderung: Erfahrungen aus vier Industrieländern]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 49(4), pages 367-386, December.
    15. Godøy, Anna, 2016. "Profiting from presenteeism? Effects of an enforced activation policy on firm profits," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 122-128.
    16. Tito Boeri & Paolo Naticchioni & Vincenzo Scrutinio & Edoardo di Porto, 2021. "Friday morning fever. Evidence from a randomized experiment on sick leave monitoring in the public sector," CEP Discussion Papers dp1770, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    17. Manuel Flores & Melchor Fernández & Yolanda Pena-Boquete, 2020. "The impact of health on wages: evidence from Europe before and during the Great Recession," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 72(2), pages 319-346.
    18. Chiara Scaratti & Matilde Leonardi & Fabiola Silvaggi & Carolina C. Ávila & Amalia Muñoz-Murillo & Panayiota Stavroussi & Olga Roka & Helena Burger & Klemens Fheodoroff & Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk & Carl, 2018. "Mapping European Welfare Models: State of the Art of Strategies for Professional Integration and Reintegration of Persons with Chronic Diseases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Pichler, Stefan & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2015. "The Pros and Cons of Sick Pay Schemes: A Method to Test for Contagious Presenteeism and Shirking Behavior," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112940, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    20. Rehwald, Kai & Rosholm, Michael & Rouland, Bénédicte, 2018. "Labour market effects of activating sick-listed workers," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 15-32.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:jt47m. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.