IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/bmtdq_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Meta-Regression Methods to Characterize Evidence Strength Using Meaningful-Effect Percentages Conditional on Study Characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Mathur, Maya B
  • VanderWeele, Tyler J.

Abstract

Meta-regression analyses usually focus on estimating and testing differences in average effect sizes between individual levels of each meta-regression covariate in turn. These metrics are useful but have limitations: they consider each covariate individually, rather than in combination, and they characterize only the mean of a potentially heterogeneous distribution of effects. We propose additional metrics that address both limitations. Given a chosen threshold representing a meaningfully strong effect size, these metrics address the questions: (1) “For a given joint level of the covariates, what percentage of the population effects are meaningfully strong?” and (2) “For any two joint levels of the covariates, what is the difference between these percentages of meaningfully strong effects?” We provide semiparametric methods for estimation and inference and assess their performance in a simulation study. We apply the proposed methods to meta-regression analyses on memory consolidation and on dietary behavior interventions, illustrating how the methods can provide more information than standard reporting alone. To facilitate implementing the methods in practice, we provide reporting guidelines and simple R code.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathur, Maya B & VanderWeele, Tyler J., 2020. "Meta-Regression Methods to Characterize Evidence Strength Using Meaningful-Effect Percentages Conditional on Study Characteristics," OSF Preprints bmtdq_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:bmtdq_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/bmtdq_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5f0610791484ac010766ca5b/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/bmtdq_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:bmtdq_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.