Author
Listed:
- Cavve, Blake Stockton
- Hurlstone, Mark J.
- Farrell, Simon
Abstract
A number of social preference models have been proposed to account for the effect of social context on economic decision-making. To better differentiate these preferences at the individual level, we developed an adaptive binary-choice procedure based upon the Parameter Estimation by Sequential Testing (PEST) algorithm to estimate indifference points for scenarios of equality and inequality. We combined elicited indifference points in scenarios where the inequalities posed were advantageous and those where inequalities were disadvantageous to represent underlying motives of preference in two dimensional choice space (N = 83). We also explored the relationship between preference and leisure (vacation time) versus non-leisure (low income, high income, attractiveness, intelligence, and praise) attributes. We find considerable heterogeneity in preferences for leisure and non-leisure characteristics. Overall, a consistent plurality of participants fall into space characterised as “equality seeking”, followed by “status avoiding” and “relative advantage” preference archetypes. Self-interest preferences were strongest in low income and vacation attributes. Concern with advantageous inequality was correlated across domains, as was concern with disadvantageous inequality. The results highlight both discrete and continuous individual differences in social preference.
Suggested Citation
Cavve, Blake Stockton & Hurlstone, Mark J. & Farrell, Simon, 2024.
"Stated Preferences for Inequality Aversion and Rank-Status,"
OSF Preprints
7tq4e_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:osfxxx:7tq4e_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/7tq4e_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:7tq4e_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.