IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/5am9q_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Power Rules: Practical Statistical Power Calculations

Author

Listed:
  • Rainey, Carlisle

Abstract

Recent work emphasizes the importance of statistical power and shows that power in the social sciences tends to be extremely low. In this paper, I offer simple rules that make statistical power more approachable for substantive researchers. The rules describe how researchers can compute power using (1) features of a reference population, (2) an existing study with a similar design and outcome, and/or (3) a pilot study. In the case of balanced, between-subjects designs (perhaps controlling for pre-treatment variables), these rules are sufficient for a complete and compelling power analysis for treatment effects and interactions using only paper-and-pencil. For more complex designs, these rules can provide a useful ballpark prediction before turning to specialized software or complex simulations. Most importantly, these rules help researchers develop a sharp intuition about statistical power. For example, it can be helpful for readers and researchers to know that experiments have 80\% power to detect effects that are 2.5 times larger than the standard error and how to easily form a conservative prediction of the standard error using pilot data. These rules lower the barrier to entry for researchers new to thinking carefully about statistical power and help researchers design powerful, informative experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Rainey, Carlisle, 2025. "Power Rules: Practical Statistical Power Calculations," OSF Preprints 5am9q_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:5am9q_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/5am9q_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/679221495089fe63f2b535d2/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/5am9q_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arel-Bundock, Vincent & Briggs, Ryan C. & Doucouliagos, Hristos & Mendoza Aviña, Marco & Stanley, Tom D., 2022. "Quantitative Political Science Research is Greatly Underpowered," I4R Discussion Paper Series 6, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    2. Carlisle Rainey, 2014. "Arguing for a Negligible Effect," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(4), pages 1083-1091, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rainey, Carlisle, 2025. "Use and Misuse of a Fast Approximation: Not a Criticism, but a Caution," MetaArXiv 8z45v_v2, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert A. Jackson & Matthew Pietryka, 2022. "The influence of becoming a parent on political participation in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(3), pages 565-580, May.
    2. Agustín Goenaga & Oriol Sabaté & Jan Teorell, 2023. "The state does not live by warfare alone: War and revenue in the long nineteenth century," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 393-418, April.
    3. Kikuta,Kyosuke, 2024. "Eclipse: How Darkness Shapes Violence in Africa," IDE Discussion Papers 941, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    4. Matthew Hauenstein, 2020. "The conditional effect of audiences on credibility," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(3), pages 422-436, May.
    5. Gregory Eady & Tom Paskhalis & Jan Zilinsky & Richard Bonneau & Jonathan Nagler & Joshua A. Tucker, 2023. "Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Agnese Vitali & Romina Fraboni, 2022. "Pooling of Wealth in Marriage: The Role of Premarital Cohabitation," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(4), pages 721-754, October.
    7. Adam S. Chilton & Mila Versteeg, 2015. "The Failure of Constitutional Torture Prohibitions," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(2), pages 417-452.
    8. Hoffmann, Manuel & Mosquera, Roberto & Chadi, Adrian, 2019. "Vaccines at Work," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203661, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Libman, A., 2024. ""Zoo" of empirical results: Quantitative research and accumulation of knowledge in social sciences," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 65(4), pages 178-194.
    10. McCaskey Kelly & Rainey Carlisle, 2015. "Substantive Importance and the Veil of Statistical Significance," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1-2), pages 77-96, December.
    11. Paccagnella, Omar & Pongiglione, Benedetta, 2022. "Depression deterioration of older adults during the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak in Europe," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    12. Daniel J. Smith, 2023. "Austrian economics as a relevant research program," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 501-514, December.
    13. Debra Javeline & Tracy Kijewski-Correa & Angela Chesler, 2019. "Does it matter if you “believe” in climate change? Not for coastal home vulnerability," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 511-532, August.
    14. Rainey, Carlisle, 2025. "Power Rules: Practical Statistical Power Calculations," OSF Preprints 5am9q, Center for Open Science.
    15. Mari, Gabriele & Keizer, Renske, 2021. "Do high-income households 'label' family cash transfers? Evidence on family expenditures from Australia," SocArXiv ucyzb, Center for Open Science.
    16. Kyle Rozema, 2021. "Does the Bar Exam Protect the Public?," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 801-848, December.
    17. Greg Goelzhauser, 2024. "Constitutional accountability for police shootings," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 92-108, March.
    18. Patrick E. Shea & Charlotte Christian, 2017. "The Impact of Women Legislators on Humanitarian Military Interventions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(10), pages 2043-2073, November.
    19. Kevin L. Cope & Charles Crabtree, 2020. "A Nationalist Backlash to International Refugee Law: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Turkey," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 752-788, December.
    20. Tobias Risse, 2024. "External threats and state support for arms control," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(2), pages 214-227, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:5am9q_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.