IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/39njx_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

AI Philosophy: Sources of Legitimacy to Analyze Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Gil, Olga

Abstract

The following pages aim to reflect upon how to analyze the governance of artificial intelligence in a comparative perspective. In doing so, a dashboard is developed for the analysis and for eventual comparisons between democratic and non democratic regimes. The Gil dashboard of legitimacy would allow us to assess key features that determine the governance model for artificial intelligence at the national level, for local governments and other participant actors. The framework also allows us to appraise aims of the governance strategy, and what aims are left aside. The work opens windows to discuss 1) the complex reality of AI command and control 2) uncertainties about future society and the polity against AI development and 3) cultural values enshrined in countries' AI development. The theoretical framework could be of use to advance case studies globally, and comparative endeavors.

Suggested Citation

  • Gil, Olga, 2023. "AI Philosophy: Sources of Legitimacy to Analyze Artificial Intelligence," OSF Preprints 39njx_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:39njx_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/39njx_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/649812276c0981077e7d19b3/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/39njx_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:39njx_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.