IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/2nw5g_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Empirical Evidence for the New Definitions in Financial Markets and Equity Premium Puzzle

Author

Listed:
  • Aras, Atilla

Abstract

This study presents empirical evidence to support the validity of new definitions in financial markets. The author develops a new method to determine investors' risk attitudes in financial markets. The risk attitudes of investors in US financial markets from 1889-1978 are analyzed and the results indicate that equity investors who invested in the composite S&P 500 index were risk-averse in 1977. Conversely, risk-free asset investors who invested in US Treasury bills were found to exhibit not enough risk-loving behavior, which can be considered a type of risk-averse behavior. These findings suggest that the new definitions in financial markets accurately reflect the behavior of investors and should be considered in investment strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Aras, Atilla, 2023. "Empirical Evidence for the New Definitions in Financial Markets and Equity Premium Puzzle," OSF Preprints 2nw5g_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2nw5g_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/2nw5g_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6454e7195bde2c10e80b1f3c/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/2nw5g_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:2nw5g_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.