IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/govaah/3-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Promoting inclusive growth through better regulation: The role of regulatory impact assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Rex Deighton-Smith

    (Jaguar Consulting Pty Ltd)

  • Angelo Erbacci

    (OECD)

  • Céline Kauffmann

    (OECD)

Abstract

Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) is a critical tool in the hands of governments to ensure that regulation achieves its objectives. Inclusive growth has become an important objective of the political agenda of OECD countries. This paper examines the potential contribution of RIA to better incorporating the inclusive growth perspective in regulatory decision-making. It does this by reviewing current RIA policies and guidance documents in a range of OECD countries, by reviewing the literature on the use of RIA to address social and environmental issues and by sampling a number of recent RIA from leading countries. Building on the available evidence, the paper proposes a number of principles and considerations for decision-makers to design appropriate systems and mechanisms for addressing inclusive growth in RIA.

Suggested Citation

  • Rex Deighton-Smith & Angelo Erbacci & Céline Kauffmann, 2016. "Promoting inclusive growth through better regulation: The role of regulatory impact assessment," OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers 3, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:govaah:3-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jm3tqwqp1vj-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jm3tqwqp1vj-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jm3tqwqp1vj-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. De Visser Maartje, 2019. "Constitutional Judges as Agents for Development," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 691-722, October.
    2. Kovachev, Goran, 2017. "Cost Analysis of the Regulatory Impact Assessment Process," MPRA Paper 83832, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Nov 2017.
    3. Simon Grima & Pierpaolo Marano, 2021. "Designing a Model for Testing the Effectiveness of a Regulation: The Case of DORA for Insurance Undertakings," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Yuzhakov, Vladimir (Южаков, Владимир) & Dobrolyubova, Elena (Добролюбова, Елена), 2018. "OECD Requirements to the Quality of State Policy Development and State Regulation and the Possibility of Their Accounting in Russian Conditions [Требования Оэср К Качеству Разработки Государственно," Working Papers 041809, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    5. Maria Borga & Perla Ibarlucea Flores & Monika Sztajerowska, 2020. "Drivers of divestment decisions of multinational enterprises - A cross-country firm-level perspective," OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2019/03, OECD Publishing.
    6. Lee, Jongyearn, 2019. "Easier Set Than Done: Stakeholder Engagement as Public-Private Partnership in Regulatory Policy of South Korea," KDI Journal of Economic Policy, Korea Development Institute (KDI), vol. 41(3), pages 39-75.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    better regulation; evaluation; inclusive growth; regulatory impact assessment; regulatory policy; social welfare;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law
    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govaah:3-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/teoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.