IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduddd/9-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

School Autonomy and Accountability: Are They Related to Student Performance?

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

In recent years, many schools have grown into more autonomous organisations and have become more accountable to students, parents and the public at large for their outcomes. PISA results suggest that, when autonomy and accountability are intelligently combined, they tend to be associated with better student performance...

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2011. "School Autonomy and Accountability: Are They Related to Student Performance?," PISA in Focus 9, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduddd:9-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5k9h362kcx9w-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9h362kcx9w-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5k9h362kcx9w-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Eyles & Stephen Machin, 2019. "The Introduction of Academy Schools to England's Education," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1107-1146.
    2. Kengo, Igei & Takako, Yuki & Angela Demas, 2015. "Measuring Quality of Policies and Their Implementation for Better Learning: Adapting the World Bank’s SABER Tools School Autonomy and Accountability to Burkina Faso," Working Papers 109, JICA Research Institute.
    3. Patricia Costa & Luisa Araujo, "undated". "Quality of Teaching and Learning in Science," JRC Research Reports JRC109064, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Urbanovič Jolanta & de Vries Michiel S. & Stankevič Barbara, 2021. "Unanticipated Consequences of Reforms in School Governance," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 273-298, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduddd:9-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.