IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/agraaa/82-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public goods and externalities: Agri-environmental Policy Measures in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond Schrijver

    (Wageningen UR Alterra Landscape Centre)

  • Tetsuya Uetake

    (OECD)

Abstract

Agriculture is a provider of commodities such as food, feed, fibre and fuel and, it can also bring both positive and negative impacts on the environment such as biodiversity, water and soil quality. These environmental externalities from agricultural activities may also have characteristics of non-rivalry and non-excludability. When they have these characteristics, they can be defined as agri-environmental public goods. Agri-environmental public goods need not necessarily be desirable; that is, they may cause harm and can be defined as agri-environmental public bads. Public Goods and Externalities: Agri-environmental Policy Measures in the Netherlands aims to improve our understanding of the best policy measures to provide agri-environmental public goods and reduce agri-environmental public bads, by looking at the experiences of the Netherlands. This report provides information to contribute to policy design addressing the provision of agri-environmental public goods including the reduction of agri-environmental public bads. It is one of the five country case studies (Australia, Japan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and United States), which provide inputs into the main OECD book, Public Goods, Externalities and Agri-environmental Policy Measures in Selected OECD Countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymond Schrijver & Tetsuya Uetake, 2015. "Public goods and externalities: Agri-environmental Policy Measures in the Netherlands," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 82, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:agraaa:82-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5js08hwpr1q8-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5js08hwpr1q8-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5js08hwpr1q8-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ceccacci, Alberto & Lopes, Ana Faria & Mulazzani, Luca & Malorgio, Giulio, 2024. "Recreation in coastal environments: Estimating the non-market value of fishing harbors," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Asta Mikalauskiene & Justas Štreimikis & Ignas Mikalauskas & Gintarė Stankūnienė & Rimantas Dapkus, 2019. "Comparative Assessment of Climate Change Mitigation Policies in Fuel Combustion Sector of Lithuania and Bulgaria," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Qinxin Guo & Junyi Shen, 2020. "Valuing Rural Residents' Attitude Regarding agri-environmental Policy in China: A Best-worst Scaling Analysis," Discussion Paper Series DP2020-01, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    4. Athanasios Ragkos & Kentaro Hayashi & João Serra & Hideaki Shibata & Efstratios Michalis & Sadao Eguchi & Azusa Oita & Claudia Marques-dos-Santos Cordovil, 2021. "Contrasting Considerations among Agricultural Stakeholders in Japan on Sustainable Nitrogen Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agri-environmental policies; externalities; Netherlands; public goods;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:agraaa:82-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tdoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.