IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/0207.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Local Government Budgeting: The Econometric Comparison of Political and Bureaucratic Models

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Feldstein
  • Daniel J. Frisch

Abstract

The current paper presents a method of deciding the question of whether any given stage in the budget process is an example of the "political" or the "bureaucratic" model. We then use it to study local government spending on education. The basis for our method is the important difference between the effect of intergovernmental aid that is implied by the political budget model and by the bureaucratic budget model. According to the bureaucratic model, the effect of inter-governmental aid on each category of educational input (e.g., teachers' salaries, books, etc.) depends only on the change in total educational spending induced by the aid and not on the type of aid that causes the change in spending. In contrast, the political budget model implies that the overall expenditure increase is the result of separate decisions on each of the expenditure categories and that the changes in these expenditure categories will depend on the form of the intergovernmental aid. Our method of exploiting this difference is presented in detail below.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Feldstein & Daniel J. Frisch, 1977. "Local Government Budgeting: The Econometric Comparison of Political and Bureaucratic Models," NBER Working Papers 0207, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:0207
    Note: PE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w0207.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stern, David, 1973. "Effects of Alternative State Aid Formulas on the Distribution of Public School Expenditures in Massachusetts," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 55(1), pages 91-97, February.
    2. Feldstein, Martin S, 1975. "Wealth Neutrality and Local Choice in Public Education," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 65(1), pages 75-89, March.
    3. Roy W. Bahl & Robert J. Saunders, 1966. "Factors Associated With Variations In State And Local Government Spending," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 21(3), pages 523-534, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bird, Richard M. & Smart, Michael, 2002. "Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: International Lessons for Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 899-912, June.
    2. Eric A. Hanushek & Kuzey Yilmaz, 2007. "Schools and Location: Tiebout, Alonso, and Government Policy," NBER Working Papers 12960, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Roy Roy, 2004. "Impact of School Finance Reform on Resource Equalization and Academic Performance: Evidence from Michigan," Working Papers 8, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Education Research Section..
    4. Falch, Torberg & Rattso, Jorn, 1999. "Local public choice of school spending: disaggregating the demand function for educational services," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 361-373, June.
    5. Witterblad, Mikael, 2008. "Essays on Redistribution and Local Public Expenditures," Umeå Economic Studies 731, Umeå University, Department of Economics.
    6. Rockoff, Jonah E., 2010. "Local response to fiscal incentives in heterogeneous communities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 138-147, September.
    7. Thomas J. Nechyba, 2006. "Alternative education finance strategies," Regional Economic Development, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Mar, pages 7-27.
    8. Wills, Douglas T., 1995. "Further implications of the reversion level in agenda-setter models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 435-440, October.
    9. Brian Knight, 2002. "Endogenous Federal Grants and Crowd-out of State Government Spending: Theory and Evidence from the Federal Highway Aid Program," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(1), pages 71-92, March.
    10. Wallace E. Oates & Wallace E. Oates, 2004. "An Essay on Fiscal Federalism," Chapters, in: Environmental Policy and Fiscal Federalism, chapter 22, pages 384-414, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. María Laura Alzúa & Carolina López, 2014. "The Long and Winding Road Towards Fiscal Decentralization," Económica, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, vol. 60, pages 3-43, January-D.
    12. Joydeep Roy, 2011. "Impact of School Finance Reform on Resource Equalization and Academic Performance: Evidence from Michigan," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 6(2), pages 137-167, April.
    13. Oakland, William H., 1994. "Fiscal Equalization: An Empty Box?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 47(1), pages 199-209, March.
    14. Neva Novarro, 2004. "Do Policy-Makers Earmark to Constrain their Successors? The Case of Environmental Earmarking," Working Papers 0408, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.
    15. Andersson, Krister P. & Gibson, Clark C. & Lehoucq, Fabrice, 2006. "Municipal politics and forest governance: Comparative analysis of decentralization in Bolivia and Guatemala," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 576-595, March.
    16. Robert G. Mogull, 1978. "State and Local Antipoverty Expenditures," Public Finance Review, , vol. 6(3), pages 287-303, July.
    17. Byron W. Brown & Daniel H. Saks, 1983. "Spending for Local Public Education: Income Distribution and the Aggregation of Private Demands," Public Finance Review, , vol. 11(1), pages 21-45, January.
    18. Jeffrey Clemens & Stan Veuger, 2024. "Intergovernmental Grants and Policy Competition: Concepts, Institutions, and Evidence," NBER Chapters, in: Policy Responses to Tax Competition, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Arthur Denzau & Robert Mackay, 1985. "Tax systems and tax shares," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 35-47, January.
    20. Goetz, Stephan J. & Debertin, David L., 1991. "Rural Education and the 1990 Kentucky Educational Reform Act: Funding, Implementation and Research Issues," Agricultural Economics Research Reports 159490, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:0207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.