IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/a9ac308d23a64485987aa7e80097a8db.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Family Engagement Impact Project (FEIP): Phase II Evaluation Report

Author

Listed:
  • Dana Petersen
  • Megan Shoji
  • Adam Dunn
  • Natasha Nicolai

Abstract

This report describes grantees’ experiences and short-term outcomes during the implementation phase of the Family Engagement Impact Project (FEIP). It also presents recommendations for others interested in leveraging public-private partnerships in support of family engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana Petersen & Megan Shoji & Adam Dunn & Natasha Nicolai, "undated". "Family Engagement Impact Project (FEIP): Phase II Evaluation Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports a9ac308d23a64485987aa7e80, Mathematica Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:a9ac308d23a64485987aa7e80097a8db
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/family_support/2016/feip-phase-ii-evaluation-report.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tamara Halle & Diane Paulsell & Sarah Daily & Anne Douglass & Shannon Moodie & Allison Metz, 2015. "Implementing Parenting Interventions in Early Care and Education Settings: A Guidebook for Implementation," Mathematica Policy Research Reports d0b177f9bd4c49daad736259e, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Czymoniewicz-Klippel, M.T. & Chesnut, R.P. & DiNallo, J.M. & Perkins, D.F., 2018. "Evidence-informed program development: Using a common components approach to develop universal parenting programs for U.S. military and civilian families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 166-177.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Foundations; child welfare; family support; engagement; public-private partnership; parents; education; immigrant;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:a9ac308d23a64485987aa7e80097a8db. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.