IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/88154a3523cc492dbca5bcb478eeb144.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Horseshoes, Hand Grenades, and Treatment Effects? Reassessing Whether Nonexperimental Estimators are Biased

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth Fortson
  • Philip Gleason
  • Emma Kopa
  • Natalya Verbitsky-Savitz

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard in estimating treatment effects. When an RCT is infeasible, regression modeling or statistical matching are often used instead.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth Fortson & Philip Gleason & Emma Kopa & Natalya Verbitsky-Savitz, 2015. "Horseshoes, Hand Grenades, and Treatment Effects? Reassessing Whether Nonexperimental Estimators are Biased," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 88154a3523cc492dbca5bcb47, Mathematica Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:88154a3523cc492dbca5bcb478eeb144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775714001022
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katherine Baicker & Theodore Svoronos, 2019. "Testing the Validity of the Single Interrupted Time Series Design," CID Working Papers 364, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    2. Naihobe Gonzalez & Johanna Lacoe & Armando Yañez & Alicia Demers & Sarah Crissey & Natalie Larkin, "undated". "Oakland Unite 2017-2018 Strategy Evaluation: Life Coaching and Employment and Education Support for Youth at Risk of Violence," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 75d308710973407d8f2a3f25c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Christina Clark Tuttle & Philip Gleason & Virginia Knechtel & Ira Nichols-Barrer & Kevin Booker & Gregory Chojnacki & Thomas Coen & Lisbeth Goble, "undated". "Understanding the Effect of KIPP as it Scales: Volume I, Impacts on Achievement and Other Outcomes," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 7d8e94c5e77a4a9c8bf09000d, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. Katherine Baicker & Theodore Svoronos, 2019. "Testing the Validity of the Single Interrupted Time Series Design," NBER Working Papers 26080, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Emma Persson & Sofie Persson & Ulf-G. Gerdtham & Katarina Steen Carlsson, 2019. "Effect of type 1 diabetes on school performance in a dynamic world: new analysis exploring Swedish register data," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(24), pages 2606-2622, May.
    6. Naihobe Gonzalez & Johanna Lacoe & Ebo Dawson-Andoh & Armando Yañez & Natasha Nicolai & Sarah Crissey, "undated". "Evaluation of Oakland Unite: Year 1 Strategy Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports bc1d603fb09a4c1eb2a3cd6b6, Mathematica Policy Research.
    7. Jaime Thomas & Sarah A. Avellar & John Deke & Philip Gleason, 2017. "Matched Comparison Group Design Standards in Systematic Reviews of Early Childhood Interventions," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(3), pages 240-279, June.
    8. Vivian C. Wong & Peter M. Steiner & Kylie L. Anglin, 2018. "What Can Be Learned From Empirical Evaluations of Nonexperimental Methods?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 42(2), pages 147-175, April.
    9. Zhang, Chunqin & Juan, Zhicai & Xiao, Guangnian, 2015. "Do contractual practices affect technical efficiency? Evidence from public transport operators in China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 39-55.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:88154a3523cc492dbca5bcb478eeb144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.