Judicial Decision-Making. A Survey of the Experimental Evidence
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Christoph Engel & Keren Weinshall, 2020.
"Manna from Heaven for Judges: Judges’ Reaction to a Quasi‐Random Reduction in Caseload,"
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 722-751, December.
- Christoph Engel & Keren Weinshall, 2020. "Manna from Heaven for Judges– Judges’ Reaction to a Quasi-Random Reduction in Caseload," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2020_01, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
- Zhuang Liu, 2018. "Does Reason Writing Reduce Decision Bias? Experimental Evidence from Judges in China," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(1), pages 83-118.
- Eileen Braman & Thomas E. Nelson, 2007. "Mechanism of Motivated Reasoning? Analogical Perception in Discrimination Disputes," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(4), pages 940-956, October.
- Reid Hastie, 2011. "The Challenge to Produce Useful “Legal Numbers”," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(s1), pages 6-20, December.
- Shawn D. Bushway & Emily G. Owens & Anne Morrison Piehl, 2012.
"Sentencing Guidelines and Judicial Discretion: Quasi‐Experimental Evidence from Human Calculation Errors,"
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 291-319, June.
- Shawn D. Bushway & Emily G. Owens & Anne Morrison Piehl, 2011. "Sentencing Guidelines and Judicial Discretion: Quasi-experimental Evidence from Human Calculation Errors," NBER Working Papers 16961, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Dan Simon & Nicholas Scurich, 2011. "Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), pages 709-727, December.
- van Dijk, Frans & Sonnemans, Joep & Bauw, Eddy, 2014.
"Judicial error by groups and individuals,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 224-235.
- Frans van Dijk & Joep H. Sonnemans & Ed Bauw, 2012. "Judicial Error by Groups and Individuals," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 12-029/3, Tinbergen Institute.
- Christoph Engel & Lilia Zhurakhovska, 2017.
"You Are in Charge: Experimentally Testing the Motivating Power of Holding a Judicial Office,"
The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 46(1), pages 1-50.
- Christoph Engel & Lilia Zhurakhovska, 2016. "You Are In Charge – Experimentally Testing the Motivating Power of Holding a Judicial Office," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2016_15, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
- Joanna M. Shepherd, 2009. "The Influence of Retention Politics on Judges' Voting," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(1), pages 169-206, January.
- Engel, Christoph & Goerg, Sebastian J., 2018.
"If the worst comes to the worst: Dictator giving when recipient’s endowments are risky,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 51-70.
- Christoph Engel & Sebastian Goerg, 2015. "If the Worst Comes to the Worst. Dictator Giving When Recipient’s Endowments are Risky," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2015_15, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
- Joep Sonnemans & Frans van Dijk, 2012. "Errors in Judicial Decisions: Experimental Results," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(4), pages 687-716, October.
- Andreas Glöckner & Christoph Engel, 2013. "Can We Trust Intuitive Jurors? Standards of Proof and the Probative Value of Evidence in Coherence‐Based Reasoning," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 230-252, June.
- Pedro Bordalo & Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer, 2015.
"Salience Theory of Judicial Decisions,"
The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(S1), pages 7-33.
- Pedro Bordalo & Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer, "undated". "Salience Theory of Judicial Decisions," Working Paper 132951, Harvard University OpenScholar.
- Bordalo, Pedro & Gennaioli, Nicola & Shleifer, Andrei, 2015. "Salience Theory of Judicial Decisions," Scholarly Articles 27814561, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Pedro Bordalo & Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer, 2013. "Salience Theory of Judicial Decisions," NBER Working Papers 19695, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Chen, Daniel L. & Moskowitz, Tobias J. & Shue, Kelly, 2016.
"Decision-Making Under the Gambler’s Fallacy: Evidence From Asylum Courts, Loan Officers, and Baseball Umpires,"
IAST Working Papers
16-43, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
- Chen, Daniel L. & Moskowitz, Tobias J. & Shue, Kelly, 2016. "Decision-Making Under the Gambler’s Fallacy: Evidence From Asylum Courts, Loan Officers, and Baseball Umpires," TSE Working Papers 16-674, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
- Daniel Chen & Tobias J. Moskowitz & Kelly Shue, 2016. "Decision-Making under the Gambler's Fallacy: Evidence from Asylum Judges, Loan Officers, and Baseball Umpires," NBER Working Papers 22026, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Holger Spamann & Lars Klöhn, 2016. "Justice Is Less Blind, and Less Legalistic, than We Thought: Evidence from an Experiment with Real Judges," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(2), pages 255-280.
- Eberhard Feess & Roee Sarel, 2018. "Judicial Effort and the Appeals System: Theory and Experiment," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(2), pages 269-294.
- Dan Simon & Nicholas Scurich, 2013. "The Effect of Legal Expert Commentary on Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(4), pages 797-814, December.
- Arthur Schram, 2005. "Artificiality: The tension between internal and external validity in economic experiments," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 225-237.
- Zev J. Eigen & Yair Listokin, 2012. "Do Lawyers Really Believe Their Own Hype, and Should They? A Natural Experiment," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(2), pages 239-267.
- Choi, Donghyun Danny & Harris, J. Andrew & Shen-Bayh, Fiona, 2022. "Ethnic Bias in Judicial Decision Making: Evidence from Criminal Appeals in Kenya," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 116(3), pages 1067-1080, August.
- Cerrone, Claudia & Engel, Christoph, 2019. "Deciding on behalf of others does not mitigate selfishness," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1-1.
- Kelman, Mark & Rottenstreich, Yuval & Tversky, Amos, 1996. "Context-Dependence in Legal Decision Making," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 25(2), pages 287-318, June.
- Elena Kantorowicz‐Reznichenko & Jarosław Kantorowicz & Keren Weinshall, 2022. "Ideological bias in constitutional judgments: Experimental analysis and potential solutions," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 716-757, September.
- Oren Gazal‐Ayal & Raanan Sulitzeanu‐Kenan, 2010. "Let My People Go: Ethnic In‐Group Bias in Judicial Decisions—Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 403-428, September.
- John Zhuang Liu & Xueyao Li, 2019. "Legal Techniques for Rationalizing Biased Judicial Decisions: Evidence from Experiments with Real Judges," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 630-670, September.
- Daniel L. Chen & Tobias J. Moskowitz & Kelly Shue, 2016.
"Decision Making Under the Gambler’s Fallacy: Evidence from Asylum Judges, Loan Officers, and Baseball Umpires,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 131(3), pages 1181-1242.
- Daniel Chen & Tobias J. Moskowitz & Kelly Shue, 2016. "Decision-Making under the Gambler's Fallacy: Evidence from Asylum Judges, Loan Officers, and Baseball Umpires," NBER Working Papers 22026, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Chen, Daniel L. & Philippe, Arnaud, 2023. "Clash of norms judicial leniency on defendant birthdays," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 324-344.
- Konstantinos Kalliris & Theodore Alysandratos, 2023. "One judge to rule them all: Single‐member courts as an answer to delays in criminal trials," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 233-268, March.
- Chen, Daniel L. & Philippe, Arnaud, 2018.
"Clash of norms: Judicial leniency on defendant birthdays,"
IAST Working Papers
18-76, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
- Chen, Daniel L. & Philippe, Arnaud, 2018. "Clash of norms: Judicial leniency on defendant birthdays," TSE Working Papers 18-934, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
- Chen, Daniel L. & Prescott, J.J., 2016.
"Implicit Egoism in Sentencing Decisions: First Letter Name Effects with Randomly Assigned Defendants,"
IAST Working Papers
16-56, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
- Chen, Daniel L. & Prescott, J.J., 2016. "Implicit Egoism in Sentencing Decisions: First Letter Name Effects with Randomly Assigned Defendants," TSE Working Papers 16-726, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
- Alejandro Núnez Arroyo, 2018. "Information seeking with selective memory," Documentos CEDE 17131, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
- Payzan-LeNestour, Elise & Pradier, Lionnel & Putniņš, Tālis J., 2023. "Biased risk perceptions: Evidence from the laboratory and financial markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
- Jens Ludwig & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2021.
"Fragile Algorithms and Fallible Decision-Makers: Lessons from the Justice System,"
Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 35(4), pages 71-96, Fall.
- Jens Ludwig & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2021. "Fragile Algorithms and Fallible Decision-Makers: Lessons from the Justice System," NBER Working Papers 29267, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Jonas Radbruch & Amelie Schiprowski, 2020.
"Interview Sequences and the Formation of Subjective Assessments,"
ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series
045, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
- Jonas Radbruch & Amelie Schiprowski, 2024. "Interview Sequences and the Formation of Subjective Assessments," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 497, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Jonas Radbruch & Amelie Schiprowski, 2024. "Interview Sequences and the Formation of Subjective Assessments," CESifo Working Paper Series 10957, CESifo.
- Jonas Radbruch & Amelie Schiprowski, 2021. "Interview Sequences and the Formation of Subjective Assessments," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_268v2, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
- Radbruch, Jonas & Schiprowski, Amelie, 2021. "Interview Sequences and the Formation of Subjective Assessments," IZA Discussion Papers 14799, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Maria R. Ibanez & Michael W. Toffel, 2020. "How Scheduling Can Bias Quality Assessment: Evidence from Food-Safety Inspections," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2396-2416, June.
- repec:jdm:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:6:p:1176-1207 is not listed on IDEAS
- Gregory DeAngelo & Bryan C. McCannon, 2019. "Political competition in judge and prosecutor elections," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 167-193, October.
- Jonas Hjort & Diana Moreira & Gautam Rao & Juan Francisco Santini, 2021.
"How Research Affects Policy: Experimental Evidence from 2,150 Brazilian Municipalities,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(5), pages 1442-1480, May.
- Jonas Hjort & Diana Moreira & Gautam Rao & Juan Francisco Santini, 2019. "How Research Affects Policy: Experimental Evidence from 2,150 Brazilian Municipalities," NBER Working Papers 25941, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hjort, Jonas & Rao, Gautam & Moreira, Diana & Santini, Juan Francisco, 2020. "How Research Affects Policy: Experimental Evidence from 2,150 Brazilian Municipalities," CEPR Discussion Papers 14280, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- James Wang, 2020. "Screening soft information: evidence from loan officers," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 51(4), pages 1287-1322, December.
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:6:p:1176-1207 is not listed on IDEAS
- Duc Duy Nguyen & Steven Ongena & Shusen Qi & Vathunyoo Sila, 2022.
"Climate Change Risk and the Cost of Mortgage Credit [Does climate change affect real estate prices? Only if you believe in it],"
Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1509-1549.
- Duc Duy Nguyen & Steven Ongena & Shusen Qi & Vathunyoo Sila, 2020. "Climate Change Risk and the Costs of Mortgage Credit," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 20-97, Swiss Finance Institute.
- Chen, Daniel L. & Halberstam, Yosh & Yu, Alan, 2016.
"Covering: Mutable Characteristics and Perceptions of (Masculine) Voice in the U.S. Supreme Court,"
IAST Working Papers
16-38, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST), revised Feb 2020.
- Chen, Daniel L. & Halberstam, Yosh & Yu, Alan, 2016. "Covering: Mutable Characteristics and Perceptions of Voice in the U.S. Supreme Court," TSE Working Papers 16-680, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Feb 2020.
- Benjamin Radoc, 2020. "Bandit with similarity information," Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University, Working Paper Series 202002, Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University.
- Maximilian Späth & Daniel Goller, 2023. "Gender differences in investment reactions to irrelevant information," CEPA Discussion Papers 67, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
- Shrestha, Maheshwor, 2019. "Death scares: How potential work-migrants infer mortality rates from migrant deaths," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
- Benjamin Enke & Uri Gneezy & Brian Hall & David Martin & Vadim Nelidov & Theo Offerman & Jeroen van de Ven, 2020.
"Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes?,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
8168, CESifo.
- Benjamin Enke & Uri Gneezy & Brian Hall & David C. Martin & Vadim Nelidov & Theo Offerman & Jeroen van de Ven, 2021. "Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes?," NBER Working Papers 28650, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Aimone, Jason A. & Hudja, Stanton & Law, Wilson & North, Charles M. & Ralston, Jason & Rentschler, Lucas, 2023. "An experimental exploration of reasonable doubt," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 873-886.
- Anna Bindler & Randi Hjalmarsson, 2019.
"Path Dependency in Jury Decision Making,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(6), pages 1971-2017.
- Hjalmarsson, Randi & Bindler, Anna, 2018. "Path Dependency in Jury Decision-Making," CEPR Discussion Papers 13012, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
More about this item
Keywords
judicial decision-making; bias; heuristic; attitudinal model; ambiguity; parallel constraint satisfaction; public perception;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)
- K13 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Tort Law and Product Liability; Forensic Economics
- K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-CBE-2022-11-28 (Cognitive and Behavioural Economics)
- NEP-EXP-2022-11-28 (Experimental Economics)
- NEP-LAW-2022-11-28 (Law and Economics)
- NEP-REG-2022-11-28 (Regulation)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2022_06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marc Martin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mppggde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.