Thumbs Down for the Thumbs Up Emoji: Experimental Evidence on the Impact of Instantaneous Positive Reinforcement on Charitable Giving
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Damgaard, Mette Trier & Gravert, Christina, 2018.
"The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 15-26.
- Trier Damgaard, Mette & Gravert, Christina, 2016. "The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising," Working Papers in Economics 650, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
- Christina Gravert & Mette Trier Damgaard, 2016. "The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising," Natural Field Experiments 00549, The Field Experiments Website.
- Mette Trier Damgaard & Christiana Gravert, 2016. "The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising," Economics Working Papers 2016-03, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
- Newman, George E. & Jeremy Shen, Y., 2012. "The counterintuitive effects of thank-you gifts on charitable giving," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 973-983.
- Maja Adena & Steffen Huck, 2020.
"Online Fundraising, Self-Image, and the Long-Term Impact of Ask Avoidance,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 722-743, February.
- Adena, Maja & Huck, Steffen, 2016. "Online fundraising, self-image, and the long-term impact of ask avoidance," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145535, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
- Adena, Maja & Huck, Steffen, 2018. "Online fundraising, self-image, and the long-term impact of ask avoidance," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2016-306r, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
- Adena, Maja & Huck, Steffen, 2018. "Online fundraising, self-image, and the long-term impact of ask avoidance," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2016-306r2, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
- Adena, Maja & Huck, Steffen, 2018. "Online Fundraising, Self-Image, and the Long-Term Impact of Ask Avoidance," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 86, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Gandullia, Luca & Lezzi, Emanuela, 2018. "The price elasticity of charitable giving: New experimental evidence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 88-91.
- Stephan Meier, 2007.
"Do Subsidies Increase Charitable Giving in the Long Run? Matching Donations in a Field Experiment,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 5(6), pages 1203-1222, December.
- Stephan Meier, 2006. "Do subsidies increase charitable giving in the long run?: matching donations in a field experiment," Working Papers 06-18, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
- Ben Grodeck & Philipp Schoenegger, 2022. "Demanding the Morally Demanding: Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Moral Arguments and Moral Demandingness on Charitable Giving," Monash Economics Working Papers 2022-03, Monash University, Department of Economics.
- Luca Gandullia & Emanuela Lezzi & Paolo Parciasepe & Lidia Siri, 2021. "Altruism and Structure of Values: An Experimental Investigation," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 33(1), pages 103-129, January.
- Gandullia, Luca, 2019. "The price elasticity of warm-glow giving," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 30-32.
- Bittschi, Benjamin & Dwenger, Nadja & Rincke, Johannes, 2021.
"Water the flowers you want to grow? Evidence on private recognition and donor loyalty,"
European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
- Benjamin Bittschi & Nadja Dwenger & Johannes Rincke, 2020. "Water the Flowers You Want to Grow? Evidence on Private Recognition and Donor Loyalty," CESifo Working Paper Series 8424, CESifo.
- Dwenger, Nadja & Bittschi, Benjamin & Rincke, Johannes, 2020. "Water the Flowers You Want to Grow? Evidence on Private Recognition and Donor Loyalty," CEPR Discussion Papers 14996, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Chen, Daniel L. & Schonger, Martin & Wickens, Chris, 2016.
"oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments,"
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 88-97.
- Chen, Daniel Li & Schonger, Martin & Wickens, Chris, 2015. "oTree - An Open-Source Platform for Laboratory, Online, and Field Experiments," MPRA Paper 62730, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Andreoni, James, 1989. "Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(6), pages 1447-1458, December.
- Andreoni, James, 1990. "Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 100(401), pages 464-477, June.
- Eckel, Catherine C. & Grossman, Philip J., 1996. "Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 181-191, October.
- Das, Gopal & Wiener, Hillary J.D. & Kareklas, Ioannis, 2019. "To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 147-156.
- Marcus Giamattei & Kyanoush Seyed Yahosseini & Simon Gächter & Lucas Molleman, 2020. "LIONESS Lab: a free web-based platform for conducting interactive experiments online," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 6(1), pages 95-111, June.
- Palan, Stefan & Schitter, Christian, 2018. "Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 22-27.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Gandullia, Luca & Lezzi, Emanuela & Parciasepe, Paolo, 2020. "Replication with MTurk of the experimental design by Gangadharan, Grossman, Jones & Leister (2018): Charitable giving across donor types," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
- Johannes Diederich & Catherine C. Eckel & Raphael Epperson & Timo Goeschl & Philip J. Grossman, 2022.
"Subsidizing unit donations: matches, rebates, and discounts compared,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(2), pages 734-758, April.
- Diederich, Johannes & Eckel, Catherine C. & Epperson, Raphael & Goeschl, Timo & Grossman, Philip J., 2020. "Subsidizing Unit Donations: Matches, Rebates, and Discounts Compared," Working Papers 0697, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Maximilian Späth, 2021. "It’s me again… Ask Avoidance and the Dynamics of Charitable Giving," CEPA Discussion Papers 38, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
- Diederich, Johannes & Epperson, Raphael & Goeschl, Timo, 2021.
"How to Design the Ask? Funding Units vs. Giving Money,"
Working Papers
0698, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Johannes Diederich & Raphael Epperson & Timo Goeschl, 2022. "How to Design the Ask? Funding Units vs. Giving Money," Working Papers 2022-18, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
- Diederich, Johannes & Epperson, Raphael & Goeschl, Timo, 2023. "How to Design the Ask? Funding Units vs. Giving Money," Working Papers 0731, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Diederich, Johannes & Epperson, Raphael & Goeschl, Timo, 2022. "How to Design the Ask? Funding Units vs. Giving Money," Working Papers 0721, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Heger, Stephanie A. & Slonim, Robert & Tausch, Franziska & Tymula, Agnieszka, 2021. "Altruism among consumers as donors," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 611-622.
- Ackfeld, Viola & Ockenfels, Axel, 2021. "Do people intervene to make others behave prosocially?," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 58-72.
- James Andreoni & Marta Serra-Garcia, 2021.
"The Pledging Puzzle: How Can Revocable Promises Increase Charitable Giving?,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6198-6210, October.
- James Andreoni & Marta Serra-Garcia, 2019. "The Pledging Puzzle: How Can Revocable Promises Increase Charitable Giving," CESifo Working Paper Series 7965, CESifo.
- Alt, Marius & Gallier, Carlo, 2021. "Incentives and intertemporal behavioral spillovers: A two-period experiment on charitable giving," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-010, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Alt, Marius & Gallier, Carlo, 2022. "Incentives and intertemporal behavioral spillovers: A two-period experiment on charitable giving," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 959-972.
- Ben Grodeck & Philipp Schoenegger, 2022. "Demanding the Morally Demanding: Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Moral Arguments and Moral Demandingness on Charitable Giving," Monash Economics Working Papers 2022-03, Monash University, Department of Economics.
- Andreoni, James & Serra-Garcia, Marta, 2021.
"Time inconsistent charitable giving,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
- James Andreoni & Marta Serra-Garcia, 2016. "Time-Inconsistent Charitable Giving," NBER Working Papers 22824, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Dean Karlan & John A List, 2012.
"How Can Bill and Melinda Gates Increase Other People’s Donations to Fund Public Goods?,"
Working Papers
id:4880, eSocialSciences.
- Karlan, Dean & List, John, 2020. "How Can Bill and Melinda Gates Increase Other People’s Donations to Fund Public Goods?," CEPR Discussion Papers 15221, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, "undated".
"Pro-Social Behavior, Reciprocity or Both?,"
IEW - Working Papers
107, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, 2002. "Pro-Social Behavior, Reciprocity or Both?," CESifo Working Paper Series 750, CESifo.
- Anya Samek & Roman M. Sheremeta, 2017.
"Selective Recognition: How to Recognize Donors to Increase Charitable Giving,"
Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(3), pages 1489-1496, July.
- Anya Samek & Roman Sheremeta, 2015. "Selective Recognition: How to Recognize Donors to Increase Charitable Giving," Natural Field Experiments 00431, The Field Experiments Website.
- Samek, Anya & Sheremeta, Roman, 2015. "Selective Recognition: How to Recognize Donors to Increase Charitable Giving," MPRA Paper 74858, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Anya Samek & Roman M. Sheremeta, 2015. "Selective Recognition: How to Recognize Donors to Increase Charitable Giving," Working Papers 15-26, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Samek, Anya & Sheremeta, Roman, 2015. "Selective Recognition: How to Recognize Donors to Increase Charitable Giving," MPRA Paper 68054, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Karlan, Dean & List, John A., 2020.
"How can Bill and Melinda Gates increase other people's donations to fund public goods?,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
- Karlan, Dean & List, Jonathan A., 2012. "How Can Bill and Melinda Gates Increase Other People's Donations to Fund Public Goods?," Working Papers 101, Yale University, Department of Economics.
- List, John & Karlan, Dean, 2012. "How Can Bill and Melinda Gates Increase Other People's Donations to Fund Public Goods?," CEPR Discussion Papers 8922, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Dean Karlan & John List, 2016. "How Can Bill and Melinda Gates Increase Other People's Donations to Fund Public Goods?," Natural Field Experiments 00411, The Field Experiments Website.
- Dean Karlan & John A. List, 2012. "How Can Bill and Melinda Gates Increase Other People's Donations to Fund Public Goods?," NBER Working Papers 17954, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Craig E. Landry & Andreas Lange & John A. List & Michael K. Price & Nicholas G. Rupp, 2010.
"Is a Donor in Hand Better Than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(3), pages 958-983, June.
- Craig E. Landry & Andreas Lange & John A. List & Michael K. Price & Nicholas G. Rupp, 2008. "Is a Donor in Hand Better than Two in the Bush? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 14319, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Craig Landry & Andreas Lange & John List & Michael Price & Nicholas Rupp, 2010. "Is a donor in hand better than two in the bush? Evidence from a natural field experiment," Artefactual Field Experiments 00077, The Field Experiments Website.
- Bezu, Sosina & Holden, Stein T., 2013. "Generosity and social distance in dictator game field experiments with and without a face," CLTS Working Papers 1/13, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies, revised 10 Oct 2019.
- Gee, Laura K. & Schreck, Michael J., 2018. "Do beliefs about peers matter for donation matching? Experiments in the field and laboratory," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 282-297.
- Mirco Tonin & Michael Vlassopoulos, 2014.
"An experimental investigation of intrinsic motivations for giving,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 47-67, January.
- Tonin, Mirco & Vlassopoulos, Michael, 2011. "An Experimental Investigation of Intrinsic Motivations for Giving," IZA Discussion Papers 5461, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Damgaard, Mette Trier & Gravert, Christina, 2017. "Now or never! The effect of deadlines on charitable giving: Evidence from two natural field experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 78-87.
More about this item
Keywords
Positive reinforcement; Charitable giving; Experiment; Fundraising;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- C90 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - General
- D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
- H40 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - General
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-CBE-2022-02-14 (Cognitive and Behavioural Economics)
- NEP-EXP-2022-02-14 (Experimental Economics)
- NEP-HIS-2022-02-14 (Business, Economic and Financial History)
- NEP-MKT-2022-02-14 (Marketing)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mos:moswps:2022-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simon Angus (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dxmonau.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.