Evaluating the performance of innovation intermediaries: insights from the experience of Tuscany’s innovation poles
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Howells, Jeremy, 2006. "Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 715-728, June.
- Russo, Margherita & Rossi, Federica, 2008. "Cooperation networks and innovation: A complex system perspective to the analysis and evaluation of a EU regional innovation policy programme," MPRA Paper 10156, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Nathalie Lazaric & Christian Longhi & Catherine Thomas, 2008.
"Gatekeepers of Knowledge versus Platforms of Knowledge: From Potential to Realized Absorptive Capacity,"
Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(6), pages 837-852.
- Nathalie Lazaric & Catherine Thomas & Christian Longhi, 2008. "Gatekeepers of Knowledge versus Platforms of Knowledge: From potential to realized absorptive capacity," Post-Print hal-00452506, HAL.
- Martina Kauffeld-Monz & Michael Fritsch, 2013. "Who Are the Knowledge Brokers in Regional Systems of Innovation? A Multi-Actor Network Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 669-685, May.
- Martina Kauffeld-Monz & Michael Fritsch, 2008. "Who are the brokers of knowledge in regional systems of innovation? A multi-actor network analysis," Jena Economics Research Papers 2008-089, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
- Jari Hyvärinen & Anna-Maija Rautiainen, 2007. "Measuring additionality and systemic impacts of public research and development funding — the case of TEKES, Finland," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 205-215, September.
- Abdullah Gök & Jakob Edler, 2012. "The use of behavioural additionality evaluation in innovation policy making," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 306-318, September.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Margherita Russo & Annalisa Caloffi & Federica Rossi & Riccardo Righi, 2016. "Designing performance-based incentives for innovation intermediaries: Evidence from regional innovation poles," Working Papers 34, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Nov 2016.
- Nicola Francesco Dotti & André Spithoven, 2017.
"Spatial perspectives on knowledge brokers: Evidence from Brussels,"
Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(10), pages 2203-2222, October.
- Nicola Francesco Dotti & André Spithoven, 2017. "Spatial perspectives on knowledge brokers: Evidence from Brussels," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/260690, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Federica Rossi & Annalisa Caloffi & Margherita Russo, 2013. "Networked by design: Can policy constraints support the development of capabilities for collaborative innovation?," Management Working Papers 5, Birkbeck Department of Management, revised Jul 2013.
- Rossi, Federica & Caloffi, Annalisa & Russo, Margherita, 2016.
"Networked by design: Can policy requirements influence organisations' networking behaviour?,"
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 203-214.
- Rossi, Federica & Caloffi, Annalisa & Russo, Margherita, 2015. "Networked by design: Can policy requirements influence organisations’ networking behaviour?," MPRA Paper 69327, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jan 2016.
- Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Belso-Martinez, Jose Antonio & Díez-Vial, Isabel, 2021. "Playing the innovation subsidy game: experience, clusters, consultancy, and networking in regional innovation support," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111603, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Marina Knickel & Sabine Neuberger & Laurens Klerkx & Karlheinz Knickel & Gianluca Brunori & Helmut Saatkamp, 2021. "Strengthening the Role of Academic Institutions and Innovation Brokers in Agri-Food Innovation: Towards Hybridisation in Cross-Border Cooperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
- Knockaert, Mirjam & Spithoven, André & Clarysse, Bart, 2014. "The impact of technology intermediaries on firm cognitive capacity additionality," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 376-387.
- De Silva, Muthu & Howells, Jeremy & Meyer, Martin, 2018. "Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 70-87.
- Annalisa Caloffi & Federica Rossi & Margherita Russo, 2014. "The roles of different intermediaries in innovation networks: A network-based approach," Department of Economics (DEMB) 0030, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Economics "Marco Biagi".
- Huasheng Zhu & Kelly Wanjing Chen & Juncheng Dai, 2016. "Beyond Apprenticeship: Knowledge Brokers and Sustainability of Apprentice-Based Clusters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-17, December.
- Gallo, Julie Le & Plunket, Anne, 2020.
"Regional gatekeepers, inventor networks and inventive performance: Spatial and organizational channels,"
Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
- Julie Le Gallo & Anne Plunket, 2020. "Regional gatekeepers, inventor networks and inventive performance : Spatial and organizational channels," Post-Print hal-02889468, HAL.
- Michael Fritsch & Mirko Titze & Matthias Piontek, 2020.
"Identifying cooperation for innovation―a comparison of data sources,"
Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 630-659, June.
- Fritsch, Michael & Titze, Mirko & Piontek, Matthias, 2020. "Identifying cooperation for innovation―a comparison of data sources," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(6), pages 630-659.
- Fritsch, Michael & Piontek, Matthias & Titze, Mirko, 2019. "Identifying cooperation for innovation: A comparison of data sources," IWH Discussion Papers 1/2019, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
- Annalisa Caloffi & Federica Rossi & Margherita Russo, 2013. "Does participation in innovation networks improve firms' relational abilities? Evidence from a regional policy framework," DRUID Working Papers 13-07, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
- Xinbao Tian & Jiguang Wang, 2018. "Research on Spatial Correlation in Regional Innovation Spillover in China Based on Patents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
- Dominique Lepore, 2024. "Intermediaries in Innovation Systems: Match or Mismatch?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12678-12708, September.
- Rachel Bocquet & Caroline Mothe, 2015.
"Can a governance structure foster cluster ambidexterity through knowledge management? An empirical study of two French SME clusters,"
Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 329-343, August.
- Rachel Bocquet & Caroline Danièle Mothe, 2015. "Can a governance structure foster cluster ambidexterity through knowledge management? An empirical study of two French SME clusters," Post-Print hal-01132584, HAL.
- Aalto, Eero & Gustafsson, Robin, 2020. "Innovation Promotion Rationales and Impacts – A Review," ETLA Reports 99, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
- Hewitt-Dundas, Nola & Roper, Stephen, 2018. "Innovation in UK higher education: A panel data analysis of undergraduate degree programmes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 121-138.
- Guan, Jiancheng & Chen, Kaihua, 2012. "Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 102-115.
- Boari, Cristina & Riboldazzi, Federico, 2014. "How knowledge brokers emerge and evolve: The role of actors’ behaviour," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 683-695.
More about this item
Keywords
innovation policy; innovation intermediaries; innovation poles; evaluation; technology transfer policies;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy
- O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
- O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-CSE-2015-11-15 (Economics of Strategic Management)
- NEP-SBM-2015-11-15 (Small Business Management)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mod:cappmo:0121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Colombini (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/demodit.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.