IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mnh/spaper/2606.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stichprobenverzerrung durch Item-Nonresponse in der international vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Stocké, Volker
  • Stark, Tobias

Abstract

Die Neigung von Befragten zu Item-Nonresponse ist eine wichtige Determinante der Qualität politikwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten. Insbesondere muss bei systematischen Unterschieden in den Nonresponse-Raten zwischen Befragtengruppen mit einer Verzerrung der für Analysen verfügbaren Stichproben gerechnet werden. Unsere Untersuchung geht zuerst der Frage nach, ob und wie stark sich vier häufig in politikwissenschaftlichen Studien verwendete Aspekte der politischen Involviertheit auf die Nonresponse-Neigung von Befragten auswirken. Im zweiten Schritt werden dann die Konsequenzen von Item-Nonresponse für Stichprobenverzerrungen generell und speziell für die Vergleichbarkeit dieser Stichproben in der international vergleichenden Politikforschung analysiert. Die Datengrundlage der Studie sind Eurobarometerstudien in den 10 neuen Mitgliedsstaaten der Europäischen Union. Nach unseren Ergebnissen neigen politisch involvierte Befragte substantiell weniger zur Verweigerung von Antworten und insbesondere in geringerem Ausmaß zu „weiß nicht“-Antworten. Nach unserem zweiten Ergebnis bewirkt dies eine systematische Überrepräsentation politisch involvierter Befragter. Die Stärke dieser Stichprobenverzerrung unterscheidet sich substantiell zwischen den analysierten Ländern.

Suggested Citation

  • Stocké, Volker & Stark, Tobias, 2005. "Stichprobenverzerrung durch Item-Nonresponse in der international vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft," Papers 05-43, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    • Handle: RePEc:mnh:spaper:2606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/2606/1/dp05_43.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Banducci, Susan A. & Karp, Jeffrey A., 2003. "How Elections Change the Way Citizens View the Political System: Campaigns, Media Effects and Electoral Outcomes in Comparative Perspective," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(3), pages 443-467, July.
    2. Knack, Stephen, 1992. "Civic norms, social sanctions and voting turnout," MPRA Paper 28080, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. King, Gary & Honaker, James & Joseph, Anne & Scheve, Kenneth, 2001. "Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 95(1), pages 49-69, March.
    4. Dickinson, John R. & Kirzner, Eric, 1985. "Questionnaire item omission as a function of within-group question position," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 71-75, February.
    5. Thomas König & Daniel Finke & Stephanie Daimer, 2005. "Ignoring the Non-ignorables?," European Union Politics, , vol. 6(3), pages 269-290, September.
    6. Voogt, Robert J. J. & Saris, Willem E., 2003. "To Participate or Not to Participate: The Link Between Survey Participation, Electoral Participation, and Political Interest," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 164-179, April.
    7. Robert Voogt & Hetty Van Kempen, 2002. "Nonresponse Bias and Stimulus Effects in the Dutch National Election Study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 325-345, November.
    8. Stephen Knack, 1992. "Civic Norms, Social Sanctions, and Voter Turnout," Rationality and Society, , vol. 4(2), pages 133-156, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stocké, Volker & Stark, Tobias, 2006. "Trust in surveys and the respondents' susceptibility to item nonresponse," Papers 06-06, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    2. Volker Hüfken, 2010. "Supplementary questionnaire and nonresponse-results from the German ISSP survey," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 607-622, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stocké, Volker & Stark, Tobias, 2005. "Stichprobenverzerrung durch Item-Nonresponse in der international vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 05-43, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
    2. Stocké, Volker, 2005. "Response privacy and elapsed time since election day as determinants for vote overreporting," Papers 05-42, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    3. Volker Hüfken, 2010. "Supplementary questionnaire and nonresponse-results from the German ISSP survey," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 607-622, June.
    4. Philip Keefer & Christopher Kilby, 2021. "Introduction to the special issue: In memoriam Stephen Knack," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 473-493, July.
    5. Bamieh, Omar & Cintolesi, Andrea, 2021. "Intergenerational transmission in regulated professions and the role of familism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 857-879.
    6. Mechtenberg, Lydia & Tyran, Jean-Robert, 2019. "Voter motivation and the quality of democratic choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 241-259.
    7. Coleman, Stephen, 2005. "Testing Theories with Qualitative and Quantitative Predictions," MPRA Paper 105171, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Sabatini, Fabio, 2006. "The Empirics of Social Capital and Economic Development: A Critical Perspective," Knowledge, Technology, Human Capital Working Papers 12097, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    9. Coleman, Stephen, 2014. "Evolution of the Russian Political Party System under the Influence of Social Conformity: 1993-2011," MPRA Paper 59038, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Niklas Potrafke & Felix Roesel, 2020. "Opening hours of polling stations and voter turnout: Evidence from a natural experiment," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 133-163, January.
    11. Niklas Potrafke & Felix Roesel, 2019. "A banana republic? The effects of inconsistencies in the counting of votes on voting behavior," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 231-265, January.
    12. Elinor Ostrom, 2010. "Analyzing collective action," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(s1), pages 155-166, November.
    13. Knack, Stephen, 2000. "Deterring Voter Registration through Juror Selection Practices: Evidence from Survey Data," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 103(1-2), pages 49-62, April.
    14. Martha E. Kropf & Johnny Blair, 2005. "Eliciting Survey Cooperation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 29(6), pages 559-575, December.
    15. Du, Ninghua & Shahriar, Quazi, 2018. "Cheap-talk evaluations in contract design," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 78-87.
    16. Armando Razo, 2020. "Social dilemmas with manifest and unknown networks," Rationality and Society, , vol. 32(1), pages 3-39, February.
    17. Xudong An & Sadok El Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami & Ross Levine & Raluca Roman, 2023. "Social Capital and Mortgages," Working Papers 23-23, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    18. Fredrik Carlsson & Olof Johansson‐Stenman, 2010. "Why Do You Vote and Vote as You Do?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(4), pages 495-516, November.
    19. Dincer, Oguzhan C. & Fredriksson, Per G., 2018. "Corruption and environmental regulatory policy in the United States: Does trust matter?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 212-225.
    20. Fabio Sabatini, 2006. "Social Capital, Public Spending and the Quality of Economic Development: The Case of Italy," Working Papers 2006.14, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mnh:spaper:2606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Katharina Rautenberg (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfmande.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.