IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mib/wpaper/09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pietro Verri’s Contribution to the Economic Theory of the 18th Century: Commercial Society, Civil Society and Governance of the Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Pier Luigi Porta

    (Department of Economics, University of Milan-Bicocca)

  • Roberto Scazzieri

    (University of Bologna and Accademia delle Scienze dell'Istituto, Bologna)

Abstract

'Count Pietro Verri (1728-97) - Schumpeter writes (History, p. 178) - - would have to be included in any list of the greatest economists'. Within the Milanese school, he certainly stands out, alongside with Cesare Beccaria, during one of the most interesting periods from a history of analysis point of view. Luigi Cossa's famous introduction to the study of political economy rates Pietro Verri to be inferior to Beccaria in ingenuity and scientific cultivation, but greatly to be ahead of him as an economist.1 This judgement by Cossa, in particular, seems to echo the relative position of the two men in the history of ideas, particularly after Beccaria's rise to fame with a book - On crimes and punishments - which had in fact been largely inspired by Verri himself and defended by him.2 It is proposed in the present paper to revisit some of the basic tenets of Pietro Verri's political economy, with more in view than dwell on specific intuitions and theorems: namely relate those to Verri's own - quite original - conception of the economy. The scholarly work of Pietro Verri - with a special reference to his Meditazioni sulla economia politica of 1771 - provides the first systematic contribution stemming from the quarters of Lombard enlightenment in the field of political economy, especially so if one considers that Cesare Beccaria's parallel work - namely his Elementi di economia pubblica, conceived and drafted at the same time as Verri's Meditazioni - would only be published posthumously several years later. From the vantage point afforded by Verri's political economy, we gain a considerably attractive view of the most significant elements and characteristic concepts of Lombard enlightenment during the latter half of the 18th century; Verri, moreover, as we shall see, builds on a number of them in a new and original way. This paper is aimed at discussing Verri's political economy mainly along two distinct, but related, lines. In the first place the conception of commercial society is considered such as it is treated by the author particularly in his Meditazioni. In this perspective the analysis of such issues as competition and the market or money and taxation occupy a central place. Secondly it will be necessary to emphasise that Verri's approach has little to do either with forms of pure economics on one side - largely yet to be born throughout the 18th century - or, on the other side, with such conceptions of the polis - contrariwise well alive among his own contemporaries - as are founded on a sovereign authority conceived to be situated above the law. What Verri's political economy ultimately amounts to is an economic conception of civil society. The latter has natural strong connections with his own fact-mindedness - emphasised by Schumpeter - as well as with his deep practical involvement in administrative affairs and in the reforming process taking place during the latter half of the 18th century in Milan. In our view, a thorough investigation along the mentioned lines is the precondition for an understanding of the intellectual stature and of the scholarly contribution of Pietro Verri. His main ground is distinctly analytical and only by appreciating his analysis is it possible to shed light on the meaning and intellectual significance also of his practical contributions. Moreover Verri's pronouncements on the criticism of despotic government, the relevance of intermediate powers or bodies and on multiple levels of governance will be examined in a new and original light, showing how close they are to the gist of his analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Pier Luigi Porta & Roberto Scazzieri, 1998. "Pietro Verri’s Contribution to the Economic Theory of the 18th Century: Commercial Society, Civil Society and Governance of the Economy," Working Papers 09, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Feb 1998.
  • Handle: RePEc:mib:wpaper:09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.dems.unimib.it/repec/pdf/mibwpaper9.pdf
    File Function: First version, 1998
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Porta, Pier Luigi & Scazzieri, Roberto, 1997. "Towards an economic theory of international civil society: Trust, trade and open government," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 5-28, March.
    2. Winch,Donald, 1996. "Riches and Poverty," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521559201, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michel Zouboulakis, 2010. "Trustworthiness as a Moral Determinant of Economic Activity: Lessons from the Classics," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 209-221, January.
    2. Roger E. Backhouse & Steven G. Medema, 2009. "Retrospectives: On the Definition of Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 23(1), pages 221-233, Winter.
    3. Adrian Pabst & Roberto Scazzieri, 2012. "The political economy of civil society," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 337-356, December.
    4. Gilbert Faccarello, 2017. "Sæculum," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 625-639, July.
    5. Paul Oslington, 2012. "Jacob Viner on Adam Smith: Development and reception of a theological reading," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 287-301, May.
    6. Susan Howson, 2017. "Donald Winch (15 April 1935–12 June 2017)," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(4), pages 565-568, December.
    7. Claire Pignol & Benoît Walraevens, 2017. "Smith and Rousseau on envy in commercial societies," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 1214-1246, November.
    8. Scott Drylie, 2020. "Professional Scholarship from 1893 to 2020 on Adam Smith’s Views on School Funding: A Heterodox Examination," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 17(2), pages 350–391-3, September.
    9. Yasir Khan & Attiya Yasmin Javid, 2015. "The Impact of Formal and Informal Institutions on Economic Performance: A Cross-Country Analysis," PIDE-Working Papers 2015:130, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    10. Robert Dixon, 2006. "Carlyle, Malthus and Sismondi: The Origins of Carlyle’s Dismal View of Political Economy," History of Economics Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 32-38, January.
    11. Jean Dellemotte & Benoît Walraevens, 2015. "Adam Smith on the subordination of wage-earners in the commercial society," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 692-727, August.
    12. A M. C Waterman, 2012. "Adam Smith and Malthus on high wages," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 409-429, June.
    13. Walter Eltis, 1997. "Book Reviews," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 337-340.
    14. Klein, Daniel B., 2021. "Conservative liberalism: Hume, Smith, and Burke as policy liberals and polity conservatives," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 861-873.
    15. Gao, Xing & Lai, Xiaobing & Huang, Ting & Lai, Huisu, 2024. "Does social dishonesty accelerate corporate maturity mismatch of investment and financing?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Tony Aspromourgos, 2011. "Adam Smith and the Division of Labour among the Social Sciences," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 81-94.
    17. Thomas Ruellou, 2017. "Defending free trade after physiocracy: On Dugald Stewart's architectonic of passions, reason and Providence," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 742-783, July.
    18. Ben Huf, 2021. "Making Things Economic: Theory and Government in New South Wales, 1788–1863," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 117-125, March.
    19. Ryan Patrick Hanley, 2008. "Enlightened Nation Building: The “Science of the Legislator” in Adam Smith and Rousseau," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(2), pages 219-234, April.
    20. Mauro Boianovsky, 2013. "Humboldt and the economists on natural resources, institutions and underdevelopment (1752 to 1859)," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 58-88, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mib:wpaper:09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Matteo Pelagatti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dpmibit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.