IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v19y2012i3p409-429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adam Smith and Malthus on high wages

Author

Listed:
  • A M. C Waterman

Abstract

For Adam Smith, capital accumulation was necessary and sufficient for high wages. But for Malthus it is not necessary because if workers choose to delay marriage the equilibrium real wage will rise even if the economy will be stationary; it is not sufficient because land scarcity causes wages and profits to fall with accumulation in the absence of technical progress. The first qualification signals a post-Revolutionary recognition that the lower orders have it in their own power to improve their condition. The second qualification is the defining assumption of the new, ‘classical’ political economy of the English School.

Suggested Citation

  • A M. C Waterman, 2012. "Adam Smith and Malthus on high wages," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 409-429, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:19:y:2012:i:3:p:409-429
    DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2010.501110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09672567.2010.501110
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672567.2010.501110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Winch,Donald, 1996. "Riches and Poverty," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521559201, September.
    2. Winch,Donald, 2009. "Wealth and Life," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521715393, September.
    3. Winch,Donald, 2009. "Wealth and Life," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521887533, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McCloskey Deirdre Nansen, 2018. "The Two Movements in Economic Thought, 1700–2000: Empty Economic Boxes Revisited," Man and the Economy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Bruce Kaufman, 2016. "Adam Smith’s Economics and the Modern Minimum Wage Debate:The Large Distance Separating Kirkcaldy from Chicago," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 29-52, March.
    3. Erik W. Matson, 2022. "What is liberal about Adam Smith's “liberal plan”?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(2), pages 593-610, October.
    4. McCloskey, Deirdre Nansen (Макклоски, Дейдра Нансен), 2016. "Measured, Unmeasured, Mismeasured, and Unjustified Pessimism: A Review Essay of Thomas Piketty’s Capitalism in the Twenty First Century [Измеренный, Безмерный, Преувеличенный И Безосновательный Пес," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 153-195, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Donnini Macciò, 2015. "G.E. Moore's philosophy and Cambridge economics: Ralph Hawtrey on ethics and methodology," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 163-197, April.
    2. Klaus Hofmann, 2013. "Beyond the principle of population: Malthus's Essay," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 399-425, June.
    3. Michalis Psalidopoulos & Nicholas J. Theocarakis, 2015. "Disparaging liberal economics in nineteenth-century Greece: The case of "The economist's duck"," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 949-977, December.
    4. Roger E. Backhouse & Bradley W. Bateman, 2009. "Keynes and Capitalism," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 41(4), pages 645-671, Winter.
    5. Madarász, Aladár, 2014. "A láthatatlan kéz - szemelvények egy metafora történetéből [The invisible hand - extracts from the history of a metaphor]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 801-844.
    6. Shin Kubo, 2015. "Political economy at mid-nineteenth-century Cambridge: reform, free trade, and the figure of Ricardo," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 872-895, October.
    7. Madarász, Aladár, 2018. "A "túl elméleti" tőzsdeügynök: David Ricardo és az Alapelvek kétszáz éve ["Too theoretical" a stockjobber: 200 years of David Ricardo and his principles]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 449-483.
    8. Katia Caldari & Tamotsu Nishizawa, 2016. "Progress beyond growth: Some insights from Marshall's final book," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 226-245, April.
    9. Aldrich, John, 2022. "Good, Economic Welfare and the National Dividend—Pigou’s Welfare Triad," OSF Preprints 2vzrx, Center for Open Science.
    10. Mark Donoghue, 2015. "The scope and significance of William Thomas Thornton's literary works," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 569-600, August.
    11. Gilbert Faccarello, 2017. "Sæculum," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 625-639, July.
    12. Paul Oslington, 2012. "Jacob Viner on Adam Smith: Development and reception of a theological reading," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 287-301, May.
    13. Claire Pignol & Benoît Walraevens, 2017. "Smith and Rousseau on envy in commercial societies," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 1214-1246, November.
    14. Scott Drylie, 2020. "Professional Scholarship from 1893 to 2020 on Adam Smith’s Views on School Funding: A Heterodox Examination," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 17(2), pages 350–391-3, September.
    15. Klein, Daniel B., 2021. "Conservative liberalism: Hume, Smith, and Burke as policy liberals and polity conservatives," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 861-873.
    16. Ben Huf, 2021. "Making Things Economic: Theory and Government in New South Wales, 1788–1863," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 117-125, March.
    17. Ryan Patrick Hanley, 2008. "Enlightened Nation Building: The “Science of the Legislator” in Adam Smith and Rousseau," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(2), pages 219-234, April.
    18. Mauro Boianovsky, 2013. "Humboldt and the economists on natural resources, institutions and underdevelopment (1752 to 1859)," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 58-88, February.
    19. A. M. C. Waterman, 2002. "The 'Sussex School' and the history of economic thought: British Intellectual History, 1750-1950," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 452-463.
    20. Ahmad Jafari Samimi, 2011. "Ethonomics & the History of Economic Thought," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 2(5), pages 223-232.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:19:y:2012:i:3:p:409-429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.