IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v24y2017i4p742-783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defending free trade after physiocracy: On Dugald Stewart's architectonic of passions, reason and Providence

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Ruellou

Abstract

Dugald Stewart (1753–1828) defended free trade in light of a providential account of Nature, according to which there would be an “identity of interests” (Halévy 1901–1904). He thereby tried to rid economic thought of references to conflicts and thus pursued the physiocrats’ programme rather than Adam Smith's. In fact, Stewart claimed that (i) self-love depends on an accommodation to Providence, by which individuals restrain their passions; (ii) self-love fosters actions that lead to a direct increase of public happiness; (iii) the perfectibility of mind allows to dismiss “legal despotism”, which can be replaced by religious education.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Ruellou, 2017. "Defending free trade after physiocracy: On Dugald Stewart's architectonic of passions, reason and Providence," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 742-783, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:24:y:2017:i:4:p:742-783
    DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2017.1334077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09672567.2017.1334077
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672567.2017.1334077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stewart, Dugald, 1793. "Account of the Life and Writings of Adam Smith," Histoy of Economic Thought Chapters, in: Collected Works of Dugald Stewart, volume 10, pages 1-98, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5277 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Winch,Donald, 1996. "Riches and Poverty," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521559201, January.
    4. William O. Coleman, 1995. "Rationalism and Anti-Rationalism in the Origins of Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 98.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michel Zouboulakis, 2010. "Trustworthiness as a Moral Determinant of Economic Activity: Lessons from the Classics," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 209-221, January.
    2. Roger E. Backhouse & Steven G. Medema, 2009. "Retrospectives: On the Definition of Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 23(1), pages 221-233, Winter.
    3. José Luís Cardoso, 2015. "Liberalism and enlightened political economy," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 934-948, December.
    4. Gilbert Faccarello, 2017. "Sæculum," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 625-639, July.
    5. Paul Oslington, 2012. "Jacob Viner on Adam Smith: Development and reception of a theological reading," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 287-301, May.
    6. Susan Howson, 2017. "Donald Winch (15 April 1935–12 June 2017)," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(4), pages 565-568, December.
    7. Claire Pignol & Benoît Walraevens, 2017. "Smith and Rousseau on envy in commercial societies," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 1214-1246, November.
    8. Scott Drylie, 2020. "Professional Scholarship from 1893 to 2020 on Adam Smith’s Views on School Funding: A Heterodox Examination," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 17(2), pages 350–391-3, September.
    9. Matthias P. Hühn & Claus Dierksmeier, 2016. "Will the Real A. Smith Please Stand Up!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 119-132, June.
    10. Robert Dixon, 2006. "Carlyle, Malthus and Sismondi: The Origins of Carlyle’s Dismal View of Political Economy," History of Economics Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 32-38, January.
    11. Jean Dellemotte & Benoît Walraevens, 2015. "Adam Smith on the subordination of wage-earners in the commercial society," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 692-727, August.
    12. A M. C Waterman, 2012. "Adam Smith and Malthus on high wages," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 409-429, June.
    13. Walter Eltis, 1997. "Book Reviews," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 337-340.
    14. Klein, Daniel B., 2021. "Conservative liberalism: Hume, Smith, and Burke as policy liberals and polity conservatives," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 861-873.
    15. Tony Aspromourgos, 2011. "Adam Smith and the Division of Labour among the Social Sciences," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 81-94.
    16. Ben Huf, 2021. "Making Things Economic: Theory and Government in New South Wales, 1788–1863," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(1), pages 117-125, March.
    17. Ryan Patrick Hanley, 2008. "Enlightened Nation Building: The “Science of the Legislator” in Adam Smith and Rousseau," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(2), pages 219-234, April.
    18. Mauro Boianovsky, 2013. "Humboldt and the economists on natural resources, institutions and underdevelopment (1752 to 1859)," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 58-88, February.
    19. A. M. C. Waterman, 2002. "The 'Sussex School' and the history of economic thought: British Intellectual History, 1750-1950," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 452-463.
    20. Paul Oslington, 2012. "God and the Market: Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 429-438, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:24:y:2017:i:4:p:742-783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.