IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mcr/wpdief/wpaper00071.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Shared economic thought and the neglect of social costs. Why progressive economists often stick to conventional wisdom

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Ramazzotti

    (Università di Macerata)

Abstract

The paper deals with the lack of attention that many socially-minded economists pay to social issues, with social costs being a special case. It argues that while these economists acknowledge that social costs exist and are rooted in the way the economy functions, they do not frame their economic inquiries accordingly because they believe that scientific dialogue is possible only by accepting a commonly shared ground for scientific inquiry, which focuses on restricted but generally accepted goals. This behavior obscures a major implication of systemic openness, i.e. that the choice of goals and the way scientific inquiry is carried out do not depend on once and for all criteria but require the explicit formulation of a range of value judgments. The conclusion of the paper is that it is possible to deal with social issues and to carry out a scientific dialogue but this requires a two tier dialogue: one relates to the shared grounds of inquiry; the other to the specific issues to be investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Ramazzotti, 2013. "Shared economic thought and the neglect of social costs. Why progressive economists often stick to conventional wisdom," Working Papers 71-2013, Macerata University, Department of Finance and Economic Sciences, revised Dec 2015.
    • Handle: RePEc:mcr:wpdief:wpaper00071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www2.unimc.it/ricerca/dipartimenti/dipartimento-di-istituzioni-economiche-e/wpaper/wpaper00071/filePaper
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lomborg,Bjørn, 2001. "The Skeptical Environmentalist," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521010689, September.
    2. Martha Starr, 2012. "Contributions of Economists to the Housing-Price Bubble," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 143-172.
    3. Paolo Ramazzotti, 2007. "Policymaking and Learning Actors, or Is A ‘Double Movement’ In Cognition Possible?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 765-781, September.
    4. Paolo Ramazzotti, 2012. "SYMPOSIUM ON FEDERICO CAFFÈ: PUBLIC POLICY AND ECONOMIC THOUGHT. Introduction," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 20(1), pages 85-90.
    5. Pascal Petit, 2010. "The systemic nature of the rise in inequality in developed economies," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 251-267.
    6. Oliver E. Williamson, 1993. "Contested Exchange versus the Governance of Contractual Relations," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 7(1), pages 103-108, Winter.
    7. Chick, Victoria & Dow, Sheila C, 2001. "Formalism, Logic and Reality: A Keynesian Analysis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 25(6), pages 705-721, November.
    8. Gunnar Myrdal, 1978. "Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 771-783, December.
    9. Jan Kregel, 2009. "Why don't the bailouts work? Design of a new financial system versus a return to normalcy," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 33(4), pages 653-663, July.
    10. anonymous, 1973. "U.S. energy supplies and uses: staff economic study," Federal Reserve Bulletin, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), issue Dec, pages 847-870.
    11. Sheila C. Dow, 1996. "The Methodology of Macroeconomic Thought," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 933.
    12. James A. Swaney & Martin A. Evers, 1989. "The Social Cost Concepts of K. William Kapp and Karl Polanyi," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 7-33, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paolo Ramazzotti, 2012. "Social costs and normative economics," Working Papers 66-2012, Macerata University, Department of Finance and Economic Sciences, revised Sep 2015.
    2. Victoria Chick, 2013. "The future is open: on open-system theorising in economics," Chapters, in: Jesper Jespersen & Mogens Ove Madsen (ed.), Teaching Post Keynesian Economics, chapter 3, pages 56-72, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Paolo Ramazzotti, 2010. "The "solitude of the reformist" Public Policy and Value Judgments in the Work of Federico Caffè," Working Papers 63-2010, Macerata University, Department of Finance and Economic Sciences, revised Dec 2010.
    4. Lukáš Kovanda, 2010. "Kritický realismus: ontologická báze postkeynesovské ekonomie [Critical Realism as an Ontological Basis of Post-Keynesianism]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2010(5), pages 608-622.
    5. Paolo Ramazzotti, 2016. "Themes in an institutionalist theory of economic policy," Working Papers 81-2016, Macerata University, Department of Finance and Economic Sciences, revised May 2016.
    6. Ioana Negru, 2013. "Revisiting the Concept of Schools of Thought in Economics: The Example of the Austrian School," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 983-1008, October.
    7. Jim Butcher, 2006. "The United Nations International Year of Ecotourism: a critical analysis of development implications," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 6(2), pages 146-156, April.
    8. James Swaney, 1990. "The environmental imperative of socio-economics," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 45-58, September.
    9. James A. Brander, 2007. "Viewpoint: Sustainability: Malthus revisited?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 1-38, February.
    10. Valerie A. Ramey & Neville Francis, 2009. "A Century of Work and Leisure," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 1(2), pages 189-224, July.
    11. Jennifer Marohasy, 2005. "Australia's Environment Undergoing Renewal, Not Collapse," Energy & Environment, , vol. 16(3-4), pages 457-480, July.
    12. Andrew Mearman & Tim Wakeley & Gamila Shoib & Don J. Webber, 2011. "Does Pluralism in Economics Education Make Better Educated, Happier Students? A Qualitative Analysis," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 10(2), pages 50-62.
    13. Miguel A. Duran, 2007. "Mathematical Needs and Economic Interpretations," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 26(1), pages 1-16.
    14. Phillips, Daphne, 2009. "The political economy of HIV," Documentos de Proyectos 3703, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    15. JS Armstrong, 2005. "Incentives for Developing and Communicating Principles: A Reply," General Economics and Teaching 0502049, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Peter Söderbaum, 2019. "Reconsidering economics in relation to sustainable development and democracy," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 13(1), pages 19-38, November.
    17. Berger, Sebastian, 2024. "Karl Polanyi's and K. William Kapp's arguments on social costs: is there a common “revolutionary” raison d'être?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    18. Ravenscroft, Sue & Williams, Paul F., 2009. "Making imaginary worlds real: The case of expensing employee stock options," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 770-786, August.
    19. Andrew Mearman, 2006. "Critical realism in economics and open-systems ontology: A critique," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(1), pages 47-75.
    20. Roy J. Rotheim, 2013. "The economist who mistook his model for a market," Chapters, in: Jesper Jespersen & Mogens Ove Madsen (ed.), Teaching Post Keynesian Economics, chapter 2, pages 34-55, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mcr:wpdief:wpaper00071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Silvana Tartufoli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dimacit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.