IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mad/wpaper/2022-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Compliance Costs of GST for Small Business Enterprises in Tamil Nadu

Author

Listed:
  • S. Vishnuhadevi

    (PhD student, Department of Economics, Stella Maris College, Chennai)

  • D. Hima Bindu

    (Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Stella Maris College, Chennai)

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to examine the level of compliance burden through estimating the GST compliance costs incurred by the small businesses in Tamil Nadu. Further, to estimate the aggregate GST compliance costs incurred by the business in absolute terms and relative to Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) and GST revenue of Tamil Nadu for the year 2019-20, and finally to identify the factors associated with the GST compliance costs using classical regression analysis. The results reveal that the overall weighed mean of the GST compliance costs is Rs. Rs. 32091 and the aggregate GST compliance costs is Rs. 17844 million which is around 0.10 percent and 4.65 percent of GSDP and GST revenue respectively. Further, the GST compliance costs incurred by the smallest firms is 1.45 percent of their annual turnover, and the same for largest firms it is only about 0.02 percent, which shows the regressive nature of the compliance costs as reported in the previous studies. Lastly, the regression results reveal that the volume of business, sector of the business, size of the business, firms with refund claims, and the manner with which the GST returns are completed are the important factors that are associated with the GST compliance costs incurred by the small businesses in Tamil Nadu.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Vishnuhadevi & D. Hima Bindu, 2022. "Compliance Costs of GST for Small Business Enterprises in Tamil Nadu," Working Papers 2022-229, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    • Handle: RePEc:mad:wpaper:2022-229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mse.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Working-Paper-229.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cedric Sandford, 1981. "Book Review: Costs and Benefits of VAT," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 2(2), pages 61-62, July.
    2. Maja Klun & Helena Blazi´c, 2005. "Tax Compliance Costs for Companies in Slovenia and Croatia," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 61(3), pages 418-437, November.
    3. Tran-Nam, Binh & Evans, Chris & Walpole, Michael & Ritchie, Katherine, 2000. "Tax Compliance Costs: Research Methodology and Empirical Evidence from Australia," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 53(n. 2), pages 229-52, June.
    4. Tran-Nam, Binh & Evans, Chris & Walpole, Michael & Ritchie, Katherine, 2000. "Tax Compliance Costs: Research Methodology and Empirical Evidence From Australia," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 53(2), pages 229-252, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Vishnuhadevi, 2021. "Administrative and Compliance Costs of Value Added Tax (VAT): A Review," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 26(2), pages 179-206, December.
    2. Jan Pavel & Leoš Vítek, 2015. "Vyvolané náklady daňového systému v ČR [Compliance Costs of the Czech Tax System]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(3), pages 317-330.
    3. Sebastian Eichfelder & François Vaillancourt, 2014. "Tax Compliance Costs: A Review of Cost Burdens and Cost Structures," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 210(3), pages 111-148, September.
    4. Žiga Kotnik & Maja Klun & Renata Slabe-Erker, 2020. "Identification of the Factors That Affect the Environmental Administrative Burden for Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Sacchidananda Mukherjee & Shivani Badola, 2022. "Estimation of VAT compliance costs of unincorporated enterprises in India: unit-level analysis," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 421-441, December.
    6. Juraj Nemec & Ladislav Pompura & Vladimír Šagát, 2015. "Administrative Costs of Taxation in Slovakia," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(2), pages 51-61.
    7. Matthias Mors & Anne Bucher & Katri Kosonen & Philippe Cattoir & Wim Koevoets & Werner Vanborren, 2004. "European Tax Survey," Taxation Papers 3, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission, revised Nov 2004.
    8. Schenkel, Andreas, 2015. "Bankenregulierung und Bürokratiekosten: Ein Problemaufriss," Arbeitspapiere 152, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    9. James, Simon & Alley, Clinton, 2002. "Tax compliance, self-assessment and tax administration," MPRA Paper 26906, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Eichfelder, Sebastian & Kegels, Chantal, 2014. "Compliance costs caused by agency action? Empirical evidence and implications for tax compliance," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 200-219.
    11. Andrew Leigh, 2007. "Taxpaying Made Easy," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 81-86.
    12. Bilitis Schoonjans & Philippe Van Cauwenberge & Catherine Reekmans & Gudrun Simoens, 2011. "A Survey of Tax Compliance Costs of Flemish SMEs: Magnitude and Determinants," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(4), pages 605-621, August.
    13. Bumsoo Lee & Jiyoung Park & Peter Gordon & James E. Moore II & Harry W. Richardson, 2012. "Estimating the State-by-State Economic Impacts of a Foot-and-Mouth Disease Attack," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 35(1), pages 26-47, January.
    14. Eichfelder, Sebastian & Schorn, Michael, 2009. "Tax compliance costs: a business administration perspective," Discussion Papers 2009/3, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    15. James Alm, 2019. "Can Indonesia Reform Its Tax System? Problems And Options," Working Papers 1906, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    16. Naoto Jinji & Yoshihiro Mizoguchi, 2016. "Optimal Rules of Origin with Asymmetric Compliance Costs under International Duopoly," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Sebastian Eichfelder & Chantal Kegels, 2010. "Working Paper 09-10 - Shifting of red tape? The impact of authority behavior on tax compliance costs," Working Papers 1009, Federal Planning Bureau, Belgium.
    18. James Alm, 2018. "What are the Costs of a New Tax Administration? The Case of a Personal Income Tax in Kuwait," Working Papers 1804, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    19. Sebastian Eichfelder & Chantal Kegels, 2012. "Compliance costs caused by agency action? Empirical evidence and implications for tax compliance," Schumpeter Discussion Papers sdp12005, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    20. Dzhumashev, Ratbek & Gahramanov, Emin, 2008. "Can we tax the desire for tax evasion?," Working Papers eco_2008_19, Deakin University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tax compliance costs; GST compliance costs; VAT compliance costs; small businesses; India; Tamil Nadu;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • H29 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mad:wpaper:2022-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Geetha G (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mseacin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.