IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ltv/wpaper/202307.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Purpose-Based Energy Substitution Structure For CGE

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantins Benkovskis

    (Latvijas Banka)

  • Dzintars Jaunzems

    (Latvijas Banka)

  • Olegs Matvejevs

    (Latvijas Banka)

Abstract

We propose a novel method for modelling energy substitution in CGE models using energy processes defined according to the purposes of energy use. The purpose-based approach is superior for modelling the green transition because it closely mimics firms’ decisions regarding switching energy sources and is more parsimonious, relying on fewer industry-specific elasticities in the production structure. Latvia’s Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model is an integral part of the joint CGE-EUROMOD modelling system used for policy simulations at Latvijas Banka. We improve this model by 1) incorporating endogenous substitution of energy resources by enterprises through the proposed purpose-based approach, 2) including the accounting of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated by all public and private sector entities, and 3) introducing explicit modelling of expenses related to these emissions both due to state-level levies and participation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS). To illustrate the advantages of the augmented model, we simulate a scenario in which Latvia follows a linear path to achieve GHG emissions reduction consistent with its European Green Deal objectives by 2030 achieved solely through carbon pricing. The analysis of this scenario suggests that over a three-year horizon ending in 2025, the resulting cumulative welfare losses would exceed 2% in the case of an uncompensated carbon tax (resulting in a budget balance improvement of 2.6% of GDP) or amount to 0.3% if government consumption is increased to keep the budget balance constant. If instead the size of the public sector is maintained and the higher carbon tax is compensated by a VAT rate cut, economic activity expands by 1% but GHG emissions fall by 40% less.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantins Benkovskis & Dzintars Jaunzems & Olegs Matvejevs, 2023. "A Purpose-Based Energy Substitution Structure For CGE," Working Papers 2023/07, Latvijas Banka.
  • Handle: RePEc:ltv:wpaper:202307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://datnes.latvijasbanka.lv/papers/WP_7-2023.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey C Peters, 2016. "GTAP-E-Power: An Electricity-detailed Economy-wide Model," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(2), pages 156-187, December.
    2. World Bank & Ecofys, 2018. "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2018," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 29687.
    3. Alessandro Antimiani & Valeria Costantini & Elena Paglialunga, 2015. "An analysis of the sensitivity of a dynamic climate-economy CGE model (GDynE) to empirically estimated energy-related elasticity parameters," SEEDS Working Papers 0515, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Mar 2015.
    4. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2018. "Impact of quota decline scheme of emission trading in China: A dynamic recursive CGE model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 190-203.
    5. Guo, Zhengquan & Zhang, Xingping & Zheng, Yuhua & Rao, Rao, 2014. "Exploring the impacts of a carbon tax on the Chinese economy using a CGE model with a detailed disaggregation of energy sectors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 455-462.
    6. Konstantins Benkovskis & Eduards Goluzins & Olegs Tkacevs, 2016. "CGE model with fiscal sector for Latvia," Working Papers 2016/01, Latvijas Banka.
    7. Burniaux, Jean-March & Truong, Truong P., 2002. "Gtap-E: An Energy-Environmental Version Of The Gtap Model," Technical Papers 28705, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. World Bank & Ecofys, "undated". "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2018," World Bank Publications - Reports 29687, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dafermos, Yannis & Nikolaidi, Maria, 2019. "Fiscal policy and ecological sustainability: a post-Keynesian perspective," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 37777, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    2. Britz, Wolfgang & Li, Jingwen & Shang, Linmei, 2021. "Combining large-scale sensitivity analysis in Computable General Equilibrium models with Machine Learning: An Example Application to policy supporting the bio-economy," Conference papers 333285, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Nong, Duy & Siriwardana, Mahinda, 2018. "Potential impacts of the Emissions Reduction Fund on the Australian economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 387-398.
    4. Yannis Dafermos & Maria Nikolaidi, 2019. "Fiscal policy and ecological sustainability," FMM Working Paper 52-2019, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    5. Rickels, Wilfried & Merk, Christine & Honneth, Johannes & Schwinger, Jörg & Quaas, Martin & Oschlies, Andreas, 2019. "Welche Rolle spielen negative Emissionen für die zukünftige Klimapolitik?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 261840, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Tang, Ling & Shi, Jiarui & Yu, Lean & Bao, Qin, 2017. "Economic and environmental influences of coal resource tax in China: A dynamic computable general equilibrium approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 34-44.
    7. Rokicki, Bartlomiej & de Souza, Kenia Barreiro & de Santana Ribeiro, Luiz Carlos, 2023. "Modelling the Effects of the EU Emissions Trading System in Poland: A Comparison Between IO And CGE Results," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), 14.
    8. Kastratovic, Radovan, 2019. "Impact of foreign direct investment on greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture of developing countries," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(3), July.
    9. Li, Jiaman & Dong, Kangyin & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Wang, Kun, 2022. "3G in China: How green economic growth and green finance promote green energy?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1327-1337.
    10. Chen, Shuyang & Wang, Can, 2023. "Inequality impacts of ETS penalties: A case study on the recent Chinese nationwide ETS market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Birur, Dileep & Lal, Pankaj & Levin, Todd & Zhou, Zhi & Wolde, Bernabas & Wieczerak, Taylor & Thimmapuram, Prakash, 2022. "Fostering Green Economy in New Jersey under the aegis of Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative," Conference papers 333434, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Deven Azevedo & Hendrik Wolff & Akio Yamazaki, 2023. "Do Carbon Taxes Kill Jobs? Firm-Level Evidence From British Columbia," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(02), pages 1-46, May.
    13. Zhao, Zhe & Wang, Pei & Chen, Jiancheng & Zhang, Fan, 2021. "Economic spillover effect of grass-based livestock husbandry on agricultural production—A case study in Hulun Buir, China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2019. "Tax rate, government revenue and economic performance: A perspective of Laffer curve," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Jafari, Yaghoob & Engemann, Helena & Heckelei, Thomas & Hainsch, Karlo, 2023. "National and Regional Economic Impacts of changes in Germany's electricity mix: A dynamic analysis through 2050," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. Shuyang Chen & Mingyu Li & Can Wang, 2023. "The primary benefits of the Nationwide Emission Trading Scheme in China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(8), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Rohan Best & Fatemeh Nazifi & Han Cheng, 2024. "Carbon Pricing Impacts on Four Pollutants: A Cross-Country Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Marginson, Sam, 2020. "Global economic implications of the Nationally Determined Contributions of the Paris Agreement," Conference papers 333164, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Rohan Best & Paul J. Burke, 2020. "Energy mix persistence and the effect of carbon pricing," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 555-574, July.
    20. Niu, Tong & Yao, Xilong & Shao, Shuai & Li, Ding & Wang, Wenxi, 2018. "Environmental tax shocks and carbon emissions: An estimated DSGE model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 9-17.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CGE model; Latvia; GHG emissions; Emissions Trading Scheme; carbon tax; energy substitution; green transformation; energy transition; European Green Deal; EUROMOD;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C68 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computable General Equilibrium Models
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ltv:wpaper:202307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Konstantins Benkovskis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bolgvlv.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.