IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/201707260700001026.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quota flexibility in multi-species fisheries

Author

Listed:
  • Singh, Rajesh
  • Weninger, Quinn

Abstract

We evaluate management implications of cross-species flexibility in a multiple-species individual fishing quota regulation. We derive fishermen’s privately optimal harvesting and discarding choices under a joint-in-inputs, costly-targeting technology and the complex mapping between quotas set by the regulator and harvest and discard outcomes. Flexibility can reduce fishery rent due to reduced control of harvest outcomes. Empirical evidence from the Gulf of Mexico commercial reef fish fishery is presented to test model predictions. We find no evidence that flexibility reduced discards caused by random quota overages. Discarding in the data is attributed to a particularly small quota and a much larger quota set for jointly harvested species.

Suggested Citation

  • Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2017. "Quota flexibility in multi-species fisheries," ISU General Staff Papers 201707260700001026, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:201707260700001026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/d2e7b976-710a-430d-81c8-f55cc5986c03/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2009. "Bioeconomies of scope and the discard problem in multiple-species fisheries," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 72-92, July.
    2. Jerome Adda & Russell W. Cooper, 2003. "Dynamic Economics: Quantitative Methods and Applications," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262012014, April.
    3. Benjamin Leard, 2013. "The Welfare Effects of Allowance Banking in Emissions Trading Programs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 55(2), pages 175-197, June.
    4. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2015. "Harvest efficiency and fishery discards under harvest uncertainty and trading restrictions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 72-91.
    5. Turner, Matthew A., 1997. "Quota-Induced Discarding in Heterogeneous Fisheries," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 186-195, June.
    6. Matthew A. Turner, 1995. "Economics without Free-disposal: Quota-induced Discarding in Heterogenous Fisheries," Working Papers mturner-95-02, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    7. Sanchirico, James N. & Holland, Daniel & Quigley, Kathryn & Fina, Mark, 2006. "Catch-quota balancing in multispecies individual fishing quotas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 767-785, November.
    8. Innes, Robert, 2003. "Stochastic pollution, costly sanctions, and optimality of emission permit banking," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 546-568, May.
    9. Parzival Copes, 1986. "A Critical Review of the Individual Quota as a Device in Fisheries Management," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 62(3), pages 278-291.
    10. Woods, Pamela J. & Bouchard, Caroline & Holland, Daniel S. & Punt, André E. & Marteinsdóttir, Guðrun, 2015. "Catch-quota balancing mechanisms in the Icelandic multi-species demersal fishery: Are all species equal?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-10.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2017. "Spatial and seasonal equilibrium harvesting in quota-managed multispecies fisheries," ISU General Staff Papers 201708300700001033, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2017. "Quota flexibility in multi-species fisheries," ISU General Staff Papers 201707080700001026, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2024. "Discretion rather than rules in multiple-species fisheries," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2023. "Discretion rather than rules in multiple-species fisheries," ISU General Staff Papers 202311071438390000, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Holzer, Jorge & DePiper, Geret, 2019. "Intertemporal quota arbitrage in multispecies fisheries," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 185-207.
    5. Aaron Hatcher, 2022. "A Model of Quota Prices in a Multispecies Fishery with “Choke” Species and Discarding," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(4), pages 825-846, August.
    6. Rong Zhou & Kathleen Segerson, 2016. "Individual vs. Collective Approaches to Fisheries Management," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(2), pages 165-192.
    7. Veyssiere, Luc Pierre & Weninger, Quinn, 2009. "Fishing behavior across space and time," ISU General Staff Papers 200908100700001156, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2017. "Spatial and seasonal equilibrium harvesting in quota-managed multispecies fisheries," ISU General Staff Papers 201708300700001033, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    9. Kanchanaroek, Yingluk & Termansen, Mette & Quinn, Claire, 2013. "Property rights regimes in complex fishery management systems: A choice experiment application," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 363-373.
    10. Matthew A. Turner, 1995. "Value-based ITQ's," Working Papers mturner-95-03, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    11. Rajesh Singh & Quinn Weninger, 2015. "Cap-and-trade Bycatch Management with Costly Avoidance and Stock Uncertainty," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(1), pages 97-119.
    12. Call, Isabel L. & Lew, Daniel K., 2015. "Tradable permit programs: What are the lessons for the new Alaska halibut catch sharing plan?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 125-137.
    13. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2015. "Harvest efficiency and fishery discards under harvest uncertainty and trading restrictions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 72-91.
    14. Reimer, Matthew N. & Haynie, Alan C., 2018. "Mechanisms matter for evaluating the economic impacts of marine reserves," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 427-446.
    15. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2012. "Harvesting uncertainty and discards in multiple-species fisheries," Staff General Research Papers Archive 35428, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    16. Matthew A. Turner, 1998. "Optimal quota programs," Working Papers mturner-98-01, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    17. Pauli Lappi, 2017. "Emissions trading, non-compliance and bankable permits," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 24(6), pages 1081-1099, December.
    18. Singh, Rajesh & Weninger, Quinn, 2009. "Bioeconomies of scope and the discard problem in multiple-species fisheries," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 72-92, July.
    19. Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2011. "The policy challenges of tradable credits: A critical review of eight markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 575-585, February.
    20. Anders Skonhoft & Niels Vestergaard & Martin Quaas, 2012. "Optimal Harvest in an Age Structured Model with Different Fishing Selectivity," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 51(4), pages 525-544, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:201707260700001026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.