IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/1995010108000011708.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An economic investigation into railroad pricing and car allocation programs

Author

Listed:
  • Pautsch, Gregory Roy

Abstract

The movement of grain by the railroad industry is plagued by the consistent presence of car shortages and surpluses. Due to these difficulties and others the Staggers Rail Act of 1980 was passed;In the pre-Staggers system, the railroad chooses its tariff and capacity before knowing demand which creates the persistent cycle of car shortages and car surpluses. Shippers order conventional rail service, with full information, on a spot basis;Recently, railroads have instituted car ordering systems offering guaranteed service as well as conventional tariff service. Guaranteed service is ordered by shippers in advance and before possessing full grain market information. Guaranteed service orders cannot be rationed by the railroad. The effect of guaranteeing service is divided into the shipper externality, informational effect, and the rail car productivity effect;The shipper externality is identified as the shippers failing to take into account the effect of their guaranteed car order on the conventional service ration quantity available to all shippers. The externality serves to reduce shipper expected profit;The railroad is able to extract the grain market information possessed by shippers by offering guaranteed service. The additional grain market information allows the railroad to make a more informed capacity decision. The informational effect increases total welfare and expected railroad profits. Expected shipper profit may increase or decrease;Guaranteed service is purchased in advance giving the railroad advance notice of the specific origin and destination of future movements. With this advanced information, the railroad is able to reduce its car cycle time and increase the productivity of its cars in guaranteed service. The rail car productivity effect always increases total welfare and expected railroad profit. Expected shipper profit either increases or remains unchanged;Currently, railroads limit the amount of guaranteed service shippers may acquire. The reasons for this limit appear to be more political than economic. The limit appears to serve as a public relations device to ensure shippers there is enough rail capacity for it to satisfy its common carrier obligation. The effect of the guaranteed service limit is to decrease expected railroad profits, expected shipper profits, and thus total welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Pautsch, Gregory Roy, 1995. "An economic investigation into railroad pricing and car allocation programs," ISU General Staff Papers 1995010108000011708, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:1995010108000011708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/96e6b468-4452-4bdb-a3fe-05a2b5f7f2f8/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wilson, William W. & Priewe, Steven R. & Dahl, Bruce L., 1998. "Forward Shipping Options For Grain By Rail: A Strategic Risk Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Sundaravalli Narayanaswami, 2014. "Peak-hour Metro Rail Traffic Congestion Alleviation," Working Papers id:6091, eSocialSciences.
    3. repec:iim:iimawp:12905 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Nolan, James & Su, Chi & Pizzey, Logan & Peterson, Steven, 2020. "Parallel or converging? A comparative analysis of the grain and rail transportation systems in Canada and the United States," Miscellaneous Publications 307243, University of Saskatchewan, Department of Bioresource Policy Business and Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:1995010108000011708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.