IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isd/wpaper/81.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analiza porównawcza jakoœci ¿ycia w Polsce w uk³adzie wojewódzkim w ramach podejœcia mo¿liwoœci

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Panek

    (Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics)

Abstract

W ramach Unii Europejskiej od dawna prowadzone s¹ prace dotycz¹ce pomiaru zrównowa¿onego rozwoju spo³eczno-ekonomicznego, a w tym jakoœci ¿ycia. W kolejnych traktatach Unii Europejskiej obserwujemy coraz wyraŸniejsze eksponowanie jako jednego z celów UE utrzymanie równowagi pomiêdzy rozwojem gospodarczym i rozwojem spo³ecznym, przy zachowaniu œrodowiska naturalnego oraz dziedzictwa kulturowego. W opracowaniu zaproponowano konceptualizacjê pomiaru jakoœci ¿ycia bazuj¹c¹ na podejœciu mo¿liwoœci (capability approach) A. Sena, w którym uwzglêdniane s¹ ró¿ne sposoby maksymalizacji jakoœci ¿ycia przez osoby wynikaj¹ce zarówno z ich indywidualnych mo¿liwoœci (zasobów i umiejêtnoœci) oraz preferencji jak i ze zró¿nicowania warunków ¿ycia tych osób zale¿nych od etapów rozwoju i zwyczajów spo³ecznych krajów, w których ¿yj¹. W operacjonalizacji podejœcia mo¿liwoœci zastosowano modele wielu wskaŸników i wielu przyczyn (multiple indicators and multiple causes – MIMIC). Zaproponowana metodyka pomiaru jakoœci ¿ycia w ramach podejœcia mo¿liwoœci zosta³a zastosowana do pomiaru jakoœci ¿ycia w Polsce w uk³adzie wojewódzkim w 2015 r. Podstaw¹ przeprowadzonych w ramach badania analiz by³y dane z Europejskiego Badania Dochodów i Warunków ¯ycia Ludnoœci przeprowadzonego przez G³ówny Urz¹d Statystyczny w 2015 r. W ramach pomiaru jakoœci ¿ycia dokonano oceny jego poziomu zarówno w wyró¿nionych w badaniu domenach jak i dla kategorii jakoœci ¿ycia ogó³em. W badaniu jakoœci ¿ycia przyjêto strukturê tej kategorii zaproponowan¹ w ramach Europejskiego Systemu Statystycznego. Przy pomiarze jakoœci ¿ycia w poszczególnych wymiarach wykorzystano do specyfikacji symptomów jakoœci ¿ycia zestaw cz¹stkowych wskaŸników jakoœci ¿ycia zaproponowanych w raporcie Grupy Ekspertów ds. Jakoœci ¯ycia Komisji Europejskiej.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Panek, 2019. "Analiza porównawcza jakoœci ¿ycia w Polsce w uk³adzie wojewódzkim w ramach podejœcia mo¿liwoœci," Working Papers 81, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isd:wpaper:81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://kolegia.sgh.waw.pl/pl/KAE/struktura/ISiD/publikacje/Documents/Working_Paper/ISID%20_WP_51_2019.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. M. Bentler, 1987. "Structural Modeling and the Scientific Method: Comments on Freedman’s Critique," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 12(2), pages 151-157, June.
    2. W. M. Gorman, 1968. "The Structure of Utility Functions," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 35(4), pages 367-390.
    3. Sabina Alkire, 2005. "Why the Capability Approach?," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 115-135.
    4. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    5. Jaya Krishnakumar, 2007. "Going Beyond Functionings to Capabilities: An Econometric Model to Explain and Estimate Capabilities," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 39-63.
    6. Krishnakumar, Jaya & Ballon, Paola, 2008. "Estimating Basic Capabilities: A Structural Equation Model Applied to Bolivia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 992-1010, June.
    7. Kelvin J. Lancaster, 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(2), pages 132-132.
    8. Ledyard Tucker & Charles Lewis, 1973. "A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudio Araujo & Catherine Araujo-Bonjean & Victor Beguerie, 2018. "Community mills and women's empowerment in Burkina Faso," CERDI Working papers halshs-01958755, HAL.
    2. Mohammad Abu-Zaineh & Maame Esi Woode, 2018. "Investigating the Dimensions of Youth Wellbeing: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling Approach Applied to Palestine," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(1), pages 57-78, February.
    3. Tellez, Juan & Krishnakumar, Jaya & Bungener, Martine & Le Galès, Catherine, 2016. "Capability deprivation of people with Alzheimer's disease: An empirical analysis using a national survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 56-68.
    4. Tomasz Panek & Jan Zwierzchowski, 2022. "Examining the Degree of Social Exclusion Risk of the Population Aged 50 + in the EU Countries Under the Capability Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(3), pages 973-1002, October.
    5. Nicolai Suppa, 2016. "Comparing Monetary and Multidimensional Poverty in Germany," OPHI Working Papers ophiwp103_1.pdf, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    6. Hamid Hasan, 2019. "Confidence in Subjective Evaluation of Human Well-Being in Sen’s Capabilities Perspective," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Anand, Paul & Krishnakumar, Jaya & Tran, Ngoc Bich, 2011. "Measuring welfare: Latent variable models for happiness and capabilities in the presence of unobservable heterogeneity," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 205-215.
    8. Spyros Arvanitis & Areti Gkypali & Kostas Tsekouras, 2014. "Knowledge Base, Exporting Activities, Innovation Openness and Innovation Performance," KOF Working papers 14-361, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    9. Francesco Burchi & Nicole Rippin & Claudio E. Montenegro, 2018. "From income poverty to multidimensional poverty—an international comparison," One Pager Arabic 400, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    10. Henderson, Heath & Follett, Lendie, 2020. "A Bayesian framework for estimating human capabilities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    11. Paul Ningaye & Yemedjeu Tiomela & Virginie Takoutio Feudjio, 2011. "Multi-Poverty in Cameroon: a Dimensional Scores Approach. Multi-pauvreté au Cameroun: Approche par les scores dimensionnels," Working Papers PMMA 2011-01, PEP-PMMA.
    12. Paola Ballon, 2013. "The selection of functionings and capabilities : A survey of empirical studies," Working Papers PMMA 2013-09, PEP-PMMA.
    13. Jaya Krishnakumar & Florian Chávez-Juárez, 2016. "Estimating Capabilities with Structural Equation Models: How Well are We Doing in a ‘Real’ World?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 717-737, November.
    14. Jaya Krishnakumar & A. Nagar, 2008. "On Exact Statistical Properties of Multidimensional Indices Based on Principal Components, Factor Analysis, MIMIC and Structural Equation Models," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 481-496, May.
    15. Florian Wendelspiess Ch�vez Ju�rez, 2015. "Measuring Inequality of Opportunity with Latent Variables," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 106-121, February.
    16. Tindara Addabbo & Maria Laura Di Tommaso & Anna Maccagnan, 2016. "Education Capability: A Focus on Gender and Science," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 128(2), pages 793-812, September.
    17. Paul Ningaye & Tiomela Alexi & Takoutio Virginie, 2013. "Multi-Poverty in Cameroon: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 159-181, August.
    18. repec:mod:depeco:0009 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Hasan, Hamid, 2013. "Capabilities vis-a-vis Happiness: Evidence from Pakistan," MPRA Paper 44892, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Yele Batana, 2008. "Multidimensional Measurement of Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa," OPHI Working Papers 13, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    21. Mónica Domínguez-Serrano & Lucía Moral Espín, 2018. "From Relevant Capabilities to Relevant Indicators: Defining an Indicator System for Children’s Well-Being in Spain," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    jakoœæ ¿ycia w Polsce;

    JEL classification:

    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isd:wpaper:81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Milena Borkowska (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/issghpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.