IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isc/iscwp2/bruwp1201.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Governmental Accounting versus National Accounts: Implications of different accounting bases on EU member-States Central Government deficit/surplus

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Antónia Jorge de Jesus

    (ISCTE-IUL, Business School, Department of Accounting and BRU-IUL)

  • Susana Margarida Jorge

    (University of Coimbra, Faculty of Economics)

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to assess the implications on the European Union (EU) member-States Central Government deficit/surplus of different accounting basis adopted in Governmental Accounting (GA – microeconomic perspective) and National Accounting (NA – macroeconomic perspective). It analyses the cash to accrual basis adjustments to be made to General Government Sector (GGS) data, when converting from Governmental Accounts to National Accounts. Additionally, it assesses the impact of the accounting basis differences on the Central Government deficit/surplus, one of the macroeconomic indicators that EU member-States are obliged to report in order to accomplish with the Maastricht Treaty convergence criteria. From the conceptual point of view, the paper highlights relevant differences between the two accounting systems (GA and NA), namely regarding accounting principles, such as recognition criteria – cash versus accrual bases. In spite of recent GA reforms trends in the EU member-States, moving from cash to accruals, differences still remain due to the existence, in some countries, of two different accounting bases in GA – accrual basis for financial accounting and modified cash basis for budgetary accounting. This is particularly relevant since the data from GA to NA are based on budgetary reporting. The empirical study focuses on five EU countries – Germany, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and The United Kingdom. It develops a comparative analysis gathering countries representative enough of both Continental and Anglo-Saxon European governmental accounting perspectives. Following a qualitative methodology, the research is mostly supported by documental sources, namely Inventories of Sources and Methods disclosed by each of those countries and the respective Excessive Deficit Procedure (EDP) Notifications from April 2008 to October 2010, covering years 2005 to 2009 and Central Government data. It aims (1) to make a comparative analysis of the accounting bases adjustments and the respective accounting treatment and (2) to evaluate the impact of those adjustments on each country’s deficit/surplus. This paper contributes to a better understanding of the accounting basis differences for the convergence process between GA and NA, allowing for more reliable informative outputs to be reached for both micro and macro perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Antónia Jorge de Jesus & Susana Margarida Jorge, 2012. "Governmental Accounting versus National Accounts: Implications of different accounting bases on EU member-States Central Government deficit/surplus," Working Papers Series 2 12-01, ISCTE-IUL, Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL).
    • Handle: RePEc:isc:iscwp2:bruwp1201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bru-unide.iscte.pt/RePEc/pdfs/12-01.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2012
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Antónia Jesus & Susana Jorge, 2010. "From Governmental Accounting to National Accounting: Implications on the Portuguese Central Government Deficit," Notas Económicas, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, issue 31, pages 24-46, June.
    2. Allan Barton, 2007. "Accrual Accounting and Budgeting Systems Issues in Australian Governments — a Rejoinder," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(43), pages 75-84, November.
    3. Steven Keuning & Dick van Tongeren, 2004. "The relationship between government accounts and national accounts, with special reference to the netherlands," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 50(2), pages 167-179, June.
    4. Allan Barton, 2007. "Accrual Accounting and Budgeting Systems Issues in Australian Governments," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 38-50, March.
    5. Bos, Frits, 2008. "Uses of National Accounts; History, International Standardization and Applications in the Netherlands," MPRA Paper 9387, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. van der Hoek, M. Peter, 2005. "Accrual-Based Budgeting and Accounting in the Public Sector: The Dutch Experience," MPRA Paper 5906, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vincenzo Sforza & Riccardo Cimini, 2017. "Running the Obstacle Race towards Public Accounting Harmonization in EU-28: A Temporal Study," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 1-49, February.
    2. Dasí González, Rosa Mª & Montesinos Julve, Vicente & Vela Bargues, Jose Manuel, 2018. "Towards convergence of government financial statistics and accounting in Europe at central and local levels," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 140-149.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesus, Maria Antónia & Jorge, Susana, 2016. "Accounting basis adjustments and deficit reliability: Evidence from southern European countries," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 77-88.
    2. Spies-Butcher, Ben & Bryant, Gareth, 2024. "The history and future of the tax state: Possibilities for a new fiscal politics beyond neoliberalism," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Mark Christensen, 2007. "What We Might Know (But Aren't Sure) About Public-Sector Accrual Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 51-65, March.
    4. Maria Antónia Jesus & Susana Jorge, 2010. "From Governmental Accounting to National Accounting: Implications on the Portuguese Central Government Deficit," Notas Económicas, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, issue 31, pages 24-46, June.
    5. Irlan Fery, 2018. "The Influence of Information Technology on Application of Accrual Accounting," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 194-208, July.
    6. Allan Barton, 2009. "The Use and Abuse of Accounting in the Public Sector Financial Management Reform Program in Australia," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(2), pages 221-248, June.
    7. Karen Benson & Peter M Clarkson & Tom Smith & Irene Tutticci, 2015. "A review of accounting research in the Asia Pacific region," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(1), pages 36-88, February.
    8. Hassan M.A. Elhawary & Brian West, 2015. "All for Nothing? Accounting for Land under Roads by Australian Local Governments," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 25(1), pages 38-44, March.
    9. Allan Barton, 2010. "Commentary: IFRS and the Domestic Standard Setter – The Challenge of the Public Sector," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(4), pages 403-406, December.
    10. Yeny Andriani & Ralph Kober & Juliana Ng, 2010. "Decision Usefulness of Cash and Accrual Information: Public Sector Managers’ Perceptions," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(2), pages 144-153, June.
    11. Ralph Kober & Janet Lee & Juliana Ng, 2013. "GAAP, GFS and AASB 1049: perceptions of public sector stakeholders," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(2), pages 471-496, June.
    12. Nicolae Marinescu, 2016. "Spillover Effects From Foreign Direct Investment To Local Smes. An Empirical Study," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    13. Anne Drumaux, 2011. "Les anomalies dans les réformes publiques: le pourquoi et le comment?," Working Papers CEB 11-061, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    14. Arwan Gunawan & Winwin Yadiati & Harry Suharman & K. Poppy Sofia, 2020. "Linkages to Budgetary Control and Budgetary Absorption Performance," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 304-316.
    15. Zdeněk Hrdlička & Jana Ištvánfyová & Leoš Vítek, 2010. "Systémy účetnictví a evidence daňových příjmů vládních institucí [The System of Accounting for Government Tax Revenues]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2010(2), pages 253-270.
    16. Oana Adriana Gica & Cristina Ioana Balint, 2016. "Tourism Globalization. The Case Of Romania," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    17. Bos, Frits, 2013. "Meaning and measurement of national accounts statistics," MPRA Paper 44970, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Andrei-Razvan Crisan & Cristina Silvia Nistor & Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Tudor Oprisor, 2016. "Ipsas Implementation And Perspectives For Epsas Implementation At The European Union Local Government Levels," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    19. Otniel Safkaur & Nunuy Nur Afiah & Sugiono Poulus & Muhammad Dahlan, 2019. "The Effect of Quality Financial Reporting on Good Governance," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 277-286.
    20. Adriana Tiron Tudor & Cristina Nistor & Andreea Carstea, 2012. "The Way of Public Institutions to Accrual Accounting – case study Romania," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 2(31), pages 57-74, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Governmental Accounting; National Accounts; Budgetary Accounting; Convergence Criteria; General Government Sector; Public Deficit/Surplus;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isc:iscwp2:bruwp1201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henrique Monteiro (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uisctpt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.