IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc85845.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

European Hospital Survey: Benchmarking deployment of e-Health services (20122013) Composite Indicators on eHealth Deployment and on Availability and Use of eHealth functionalities

Author

Listed:

Abstract

eHealth has been on the European Commission Information Society's policy agenda for more than a decade, from the eEurope initiative(European Commission 1999) to the i2010 Strategy(European Commission 2005), and most recently the Digital Agenda for Europe (DAE)(European Commission 2010), eHealth was also one of the Lead Market Initiatives in 2007. Today it is the focus of one of the two first pilots under the EU2020 Strategy and its Innovation Union flagship initiative the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing. The key strategic orientations of the European Commission eHealth policy are defined in the eHealth Action Plan 2012-2020 where eHealth is referred to as "the application of information and communications technologies across the whole range of functions that affect the health sector and including products, systems and services that go beyond simply Internet-based applications"(European Commission 2004).

Suggested Citation

  • Ramon Sabes-Figuera & Ioannis Maghiros, 2013. "European Hospital Survey: Benchmarking deployment of e-Health services (20122013) Composite Indicators on eHealth Deployment and on Availability and Use of eHealth functionalities," JRC Research Reports JRC85845, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc85845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC85845
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manuela Deidda & Francisco Lupiañez & Ioannis Maghiros, 2013. "European Hospital Survey: Benchmarking deployment of e-Health services (20122013) Methodological report," JRC Research Reports JRC85871, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Andrew Sharpe, 2004. "Literature Review of Frameworks for Macro-indicators," CSLS Research Reports 2004-03, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ramon Sabes-Figuera & Ioannis Maghiros, 2013. "European Hospital Survey: Benchmarking deployment of e-Health services (20122013) Synthesis of outcomes," JRC Research Reports JRC85854, Joint Research Centre.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christer Stenstr�m & Aditya Parida & Jan Lundberg & Uday Kumar, 2015. "Development of an integrity index for benchmarking and monitoring rail infrastructure: application of composite indicators," International Journal of Rail Transportation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 61-80, June.
    2. Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Tasiou, Menelaos & Torrisi, Gianpiero, 2018. "σ-µ efficiency analysis: A new methodology for evaluating units through composite indices," MPRA Paper 83569, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Fusco, Elisa, 2023. "Potential improvements approach in composite indicators construction: The Multi-directional Benefit of the Doubt model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Stefan Huemer & Beatrice Scheubel & Florian Walch, 2013. "Measuring Institutional Competitiveness in Europe," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 59(3), pages 576-608, September.
    5. Vijaya Krishnan, 2015. "Development of a Multidimensional Living Conditions Index (LCI)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 120(2), pages 455-481, January.
    6. Ardielli Eva, 2020. "Evaluation of eHealth Deployment at Primary Care in the EU Member States by Usage of Selected MCDM Methods," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 20(3), pages 337-359, September.
    7. Raffaele Lagravinese & Paolo Liberati & Giuliano Resce, 2017. "Exploring health outcomes by stochastic multi-objective acceptability analysis: an application to Italian regions," Working Papers. Collection B: Regional and sectoral economics 1703, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.
    8. Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Tasiou, Menelaos & Torrisi, Gianpiero, 2019. "Sigma-Mu efficiency analysis: A methodology for evaluating units through composite indicators," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 942-960.
    9. Ramon Sabes-Figuera & Ioannis Maghiros, 2013. "European Hospital Survey: Benchmarking deployment of e-Health services (20122013) Synthesis of outcomes," JRC Research Reports JRC85854, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Fariba Mirbaha Hashemi & Farshad Pourmalek & Arash Tehrani & Kambiz Abachizadeh & Nadereh Memaryan & Narjes Hazar & Soheila Omidnia & Abbas Ziari & Maziar Moradi Lakeh, 2016. "Monitoring Social Well-Being in Iran," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 1-12, October.
    11. Patrick Nussbaumer & Morgan Bazilian & Vijay Modi & Kandeh K. Yumkella, 2011. "Measuring Energy Poverty: Focusing on What Matters," OPHI Working Papers 42, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    12. ViniÌ cius de Azevedo Couto Firme & JoaniÌ lio Rodolpho Teixeira, 2014. "Index of Macroeconomic Performance for a Subset of Countries: A Kaldorian Analysis from the Magic Square Approach Focusing on Brazilian Economy in the Period 1997-2012," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 61(5), pages 527-542, October.
    13. Hania Rahma & Akhmad Fauzi & Bambang Juanda & Bambang Widjojanto, 2019. "Development of a Composite Measure of Regional Sustainable Development in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Athena Roumboutsos & Alenka Temeljotov-Salaj & Iosif Karousos, 2020. "Indicators for Sustainable Demand Risk Allocation in Transport Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Resce, Giuliano & Torrisi, Gianpiero, 2017. "Is the Grass Always Greener on the Other Side of the fence? Composite Index of Well-Being Taking into Account the Local Relative Appreciations in Better Life Index," MPRA Paper 82718, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Sandra E. Parada & Olga Blasco-Blasco & Vicente Liern, 2019. "Adequacy Indicators Based on Pre-established Goals: An Implementation in a Colombian University," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Fox, Mairi-Jane V. & Erickson, Jon D., 2020. "Design and meaning of the genuine progress indicator: A statistical analysis of the U.S. fifty-state model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    18. Neelke Doorn, 2017. "Resilience indicators: opportunities for including distributive justice concerns in disaster management," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 711-731, June.
    19. Bacchini Fabio & Baldazzi Barbara & De Carli Rita & Di Biagio Lorenzo & Savioli Miria & Sorvillo Maria Pia & Tinto Alessandra, 2021. "The Evolution of the Italian Framework to Measure Well-Being," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 37(2), pages 317-339, June.
    20. Raju,Sudhakar Satyanarayan & Sosale,Shobhana, 2022. "Skills, Human Capital, and Economic Development," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10032, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European Hospital Survey; EHS; synthesis; outcomes; eHealth; deployment; availability; use; EHR; information exchange; infrastructure; composite; indicators; policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc85845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.